- 2,059
- Under your bed.
- Ask me, man.
Anyone know if there is a Video to go along with that Shelby GT500 in the OP?
I'm looking for a good Shelby GT500 video, too. I'm anxious to hear how it sounds. It already looks fanstastic, though.
Anyone know if there is a Video to go along with that Shelby GT500 in the OP?
Its STEMIUM because its such a hot topic.Is the sauber Premium or Standard?
I have 3 levels of judging a car (at least in GT5).
Standard: looks like a car from the PS2 era.
Semi-Premium: Premium Car missing a proper cockpit view (FT-86 II Concept or GT-R Proto '05) or a standard car that looks very good (Bugatti Veyron 16.4, Audi R8 LMS, Jaguar XFR, & etc).
Premium: Highly detailed car models.
It's a hybrid.
![]()
You're wrong. If you go from lowest to highest quality there are: Standard Standards, Standard Standard Standards, Standard Premiums, Standard Standard Premiums, Standard Premium Standards, Premiums, and finally Premium Premiums. PD uses this classification too!
I'm looking for a good Shelby GT500 video, too. I'm anxious to hear how it sounds. It already looks fanstastic, though.
You do realize he's joking right?Woah, calm down there with the "standard" nonsense first of all. 2nd, you can't say that I'm wrong about that at all. That's my own personal classification of the quality of the cars in GT5 and nothing more. Plus, I was just going along with what everyone else was doing in the thread; saying how they personally classify the car models.
You also have no proof that PD even uses that classification.
Half of me thought he was and another half thought he was serious.You do realize he's joking right?![]()
I think the standard/premium war is approaching.I'm just reading all of this Standard Premium Standard stuff and now I'm totally lost.
This is all we know about standards for GT6 and even then it's subject to some interpretation. Everything else so far is pure speculation based on video stillshots, usually of poor quality, and game replays posted on Youtube:I'm just reading all of this Standard Premium Standard stuff and now I'm totally lost.
Way to complicate something simple, GTP.
Simple way it goes, confirmed thru an industry insider:
It goes from the lowest of the high quality to the highest of the low quality and the reciprocal of each car's molecular configuration i.e. Linear-Polycosmic-rendered standardly standard standard standard, standardized standard for all standards, standard standard, premiumly-standard standard, standard times 10 to the negative 2.178e+ln(cos42 of Ɵ*)th power, standardly standard for standard premiums, standard premiums, -4/3π times the quotient of 4! divided by the reciprocal of Kazunori Yamauchi's nasal angle compared to his forehead, premiumly standard premiums, premiums, premium premiums, premiumly modeled polar covalent diamonds per wall, and so on.
*Ɵ being the wholesomely factored value of the number of visible angles in wheel arches divided by the number of pixels in each tail light (must be less than 10)
Simple.![]()
Way to complicate something simple, GTP.
Simple way it goes, confirmed thru an industry insider:
It goes from the lowest of the high quality to the highest of the low quality and the reciprocal of each car's molecular configuration i.e. Linear-Polycosmic-rendered standardly standard standard standard, standardized standard for all standards, standard standard, premiumly-standard standard, standard times 10 to the negative 2.178e+ln(cos42 of Ɵ*)th power, standardly standard for standard premiums, standard premiums, -4/3π times the quotient of 4! divided by the reciprocal of Kazunori Yamauchi's nasal angle compared to his forehead, premiumly standard premiums, premiums, premium premiums, premiumly modeled polar covalent diamonds per wall, and so on.
*Ɵ being the wholesomely factored value of the number of visible angles in wheel arches divided by the number of pixels in each tail light (must be less than 10)
Simple.![]()
I lost it at way...I lost it at molecular.![]()
Way to complicate something simple, GTP.
Simple way it goes, confirmed thru an industry insider:
It goes from the lowest of the high quality to the highest of the low quality and the reciprocal of each car's molecular configuration i.e. Linear-Polycosmic-rendered standardly standard standard standard, standardized standard for all standards, standard standard, premiumly-standard standard, standard times 10 to the negative 2.178e+ln(cos42 of Ɵ*)th power, standardly standard for standard premiums, standard premiums, -4/3π times the quotient of 4! divided by the reciprocal of Kazunori Yamauchi's nasal angle compared to his forehead, premiumly standard premiums, premiums, premium premiums, premiumly modeled polar covalent diamonds per wall, and so on.
*Ɵ being the wholesomely factored value of the number of visible angles in wheel arches divided by the number of pixels in each tail light (must be less than 10)
Simple.![]()
NO, chill outWay to complicate something simple, GTP.
Simple way it goes, confirmed thru an industry insider:
It goes from the lowest of the high quality to the highest of the low quality and the reciprocal of each car's molecular configuration i.e. Linear-Polycosmic-rendered standardly standard standard standard, standardized standard for all standards, standard standard, premiumly-standard standard, standard times 10 to the negative 2.178e+ln(cos42 of Ɵ*)th power, standardly standard for standard premiums, standard premiums, -4/3π times the quotient of 4! divided by the reciprocal of Kazunori Yamauchi's nasal angle compared to his forehead, premiumly standard premiums, premiums, premium premiums, premiumly modeled polar covalent diamonds per wall, and so on.
*Ɵ being the wholesomely factored value of the number of visible angles in wheel arches divided by the number of pixels in each tail light (must be less than 10)
Simple.![]()
Or do it in two stages, exterior first for those who can't get over how the cars look and add the interiors at as a later update. I can care less as I will still drive every car I can get my mitts on as I am more interested in tuning and driving cars and their looks come after I kick them around courses. Performance over looks, that said I hope that all cars can get aero upgrades. Tired of having cars that would be just a hint better if it were for aero to help them with braking and high speed cornering.premium exteriors, but without interiors, or simple interiors = save a lot of time modelling!
I agree.. PD should have modeled the exteriors premium quality for as many cars as they could, once they did this then go around adding cockpits.. Its not like cockpits are required.Or do it in two stages, exterior first for those who can't get over how the cars look and add the interiors at as a later update. I can care less as I will still drive every car I can get my mitts on as I am more interested in tuning and driving cars and their looks come after I kick them around courses. Performance over looks, that said I hope that all cars can get aero upgrades. Tired of having cars that would be just a hint better if it were for aero to help them with braking and high speed cornering.
Edit
Anyone else notice in the OP the updated photos, check out that track surface in photo with Silvia omg that looks so delicious, the detail is impressive.
Honestly at first I was intrigued by cockpits in GT5 but after playing for extended periods of time I prefered the darkened out black standard versions because I only wanted the view point and not the other bells and whistles. If they had a hood view I'd never use the interior cam. I am not partial since I just love tuning cars and driving them, I wonder if we get to use the 7 pot suspension system from K&W or the wind tunnel to maximize aero settings. This game has me stoked for all sorts of reasons which is the one reason I enjoy GT. They have updated the GT official site once again and seems a few photos were changed, hmm.... This game is really taking it's sweet time to make it to Dec 6th.I agree.. PD should have modeled the exteriors premium quality for as many cars as they could, once they did this then go around adding cockpits.. Its not like cockpits are required.
It's a bit bi-polar. It's premium on its good days.Is the sauber Premium or Standard?
You can also see that the cockpit view will be the same damn peephole 👎
It's quite obvious ain't it, it's exactly the same as the PS2 model with the suggested black interior...Don't know how you worked that out from that image.
For what its worth though, that was one of the better looking standards in gt5 anyways. Wheel arches look relatively smooth![]()
There we have it gentlemen; start your discussions!
I think they just smoothed it out a tiny bit but it's basically the same PS2 model although more acceptable i suppose...
You can also see that the cockpit view will be the same damn peephole 👎