- 623
- Massachusetts
- MrTimmyA
Lol
(sorry, I always look for an excuse to use that macro)
See how messed up this is? Why should he be forced to tear it down? He or she just wouldn't be able to insure it or sell it. But now you're gonna come knock it down?
Why should some one be allowed to build an unsafe addition on their house that could not only result in their personal injury, but the injury of others?
What if they run a gas line in the addition to the house and incorrectly install it and it explodes? Or what if they incorrectly wire up the house and it catches fire, the fire then spreads quickly to a neighboring structure?
Permits aren't there because the state wants to control everything, they are there so stupid people can't do stupid things.
Also, if you build an addition without a permit and get caught, you don't have to tear it down, you have to have it inspected, if it's unsafe, then you have to tear it down. Regardless, you still get fined for breaking the law.
Back on topic: The First amendment grants anyone the right to burn any religous text. Period.
I don't agree with any religion, but, if one wants to burn the others books; fine by me. I think people need to stop being overly sensitive about fairy tales.
Not only that, but, burning the Quran isn't going to make America "less safe." The extremists that flew planes in to the twin towers made it pretty clear they hate us already.