MedigoFlame
Premium
- 6,213
- Maine
- MedigoFlameX
Certainly not an Everest rebadge.
Those aren't much different than my Bronco cheap and nasty cut & shut of an Raptor back in late 2016.
Because F-150s are big as hell and unwieldy, uses more fuel, there are probably plenty of people with garages too low to fit one in there, etc. I'd much rather have any of the mid-size trucks myself. The Ranger was always a favorite back in the day and I'm pretty confident it's going to sell like hotcakes. I expect it to actually take some sales away from the F-150...I'm sure there are plenty of Ford fans who would buy smaller but Ford didn't offer anything smaller, and they'd refuse to buy the Colorado or Tacoma.Looks like a fully kitted out, top of the range model will hit a little over $47,000. Which leaves me wondering, why not just buy an F-150?
I remember when you barely had to lift a leg to get in it.Damn ****'s gotten expensive. Remember when the ranger looked like this and cost $12k out the door?
(I fully understand why the new Ranger is priced the way it is, I'm just pointing out how much has changed in 20 years)
I remember when you barely had to lift a leg to get in it.
I also remember when the exhaust pipe literally rusted and fell off while it was just parked on the street.
If the new Bronco is going to be based on the Ranger then shouldn't it be called Bronco IIEDIT: The Bronco is expected to be based on the Ranger/Everest/Troller chassis so any Bronco renders with similarities to the F-150 are totally wrong. The Bronco won't be enormous and will share many dimensions and proportions with the Ranger.
Autonews.comFord Motor Co. doesn't believe the midsize Ranger will steal much business from its profit-generating full-size F-series trucks when the smaller pickup returns to North American showrooms early next year.
"There always will be some substitution, but this is more of a lifestyle vehicle for people who want to use it for different purposes," Joe Hinrichs, Ford's president of global operations, said Monday at an event celebrating the Ranger's expected start of production here next week. "The F-150's gotten bigger over time and more expensive. We believe there's room now to slot the Ranger in very nicely in the showroom."
It looks ugly.https://www.autoblog.com/2018/11/13/2020-ford-bronco-leaked-photos/
Edit: Apparently this isn't the actual Bronco, but the "baby Bronco".
No solid axle. That's going to piss off a lot of people.
I think it's the expectation that it's being advertised as a back to its roots offroad machine to rival the Wrangler. That would imply a rugged drivetrain meaning likely a solid axle. Otherwise it's just a SUV Raptor. More so, because Dana Corp has trademarked it with Fo Mo Co last year or so.I don't know why it would. Having IFS will make it better on the road and also prevent the death wobble that plagues Jeeps. Assuming it'll be that stubby and high off the ground, it'll need all the stability it can get.
Also, IFS works fine in most off-road situations, you really only need a solid axle if you're doing things like rock crawling. I'm guessing most people who buy a Bronco will more or less just drive down forest roads or out to places like Moab (where many trails can be tackled in a crossover). Anyone looking to do any serious off-roading probably won't buy a new rig to begin with either. Once the Bronco hits the used market and if it's decent enough off-road people will just do a solid axle swap on it like they do with Tacomas.
That canopy bubble looks really weird.
It's not a true SUV yet lol. But Ford does say that it will definitely differ from this one.Possibly first test mule for the new Bronco
https://www.carscoops.com/2019/02/2020-ford-bronco-mule-possibly-spied-looks-pretty-hardcore/
How? All we've seen is a drivetrain mule and an outline.This is likely the most accurate render yet.