Formula 1 Heineken Australian Grand Prix 2022Formula 1 

  • Thread starter Jimlaad43
  • 201 comments
  • 11,598 views
Either way, it is not the engine blowing up and I would love to understand why you think they deliberately underfueled their cars to the point where Verstappen's car retired several laps before the end of the Bahrain GP despite a safety car period, even though that was completely pointless even if he had made it to the end.

And if the issue they're allegedly refusing to fix is just them being the dumbest F1 team of all time and repeatedly severely underfueling their cars, how did Verstappen's engine blow up because of that today? I've never heard of an engine blowing up after running out of fuel. And it happened like 20 laps before the end.
I don't know how a car that runs out of fuel blows up, you'd better ask Christian Horner because that was a direct quote from him in the Sky Sports interview after the race today
 
I don't know how a car that runs out of fuel blows up, you'd better ask Christian Horner because that was a direct quote from him in the Sky Sports interview after the race today
Saying there's a fuel issue, is something very different than saying you ran out of fuel. It could e.g. be a fuel line that burst or something like that.
I know you have an absolute hate for Red Bull and Horner, but please don't misrepresent what they are saying
 
Last edited:
Helmut reportedly sharing the engine has no issues, he suspects there is a fuel tank or fuel line problem.
 
Last edited:
As a Ferrari fanboi it's nice to see them doing well again! Hopefully, it's their year for a championship this year.
 
I was intending to stay away from spoilers and the like to watch the C4 highlights later, but that plan came a cropper 5 minutes after waking up... what happened to 'Nando exactly? Just seen the 7 highlight reel on Youtube, they mentioned him and Sainz started on the Hards and he was running quite well mid-race. Did he get screwed over by the SC too? Either way, what a weekend that could've been for him if everything worked out, what with Max pulling up again...
 
I was intending to stay away from spoilers and the like to watch the C4 highlights later, but that plan came a cropper 5 minutes after waking up... what happened to 'Nando exactly? Just seen the 7 highlight reel on Youtube, they mentioned him and Sainz started on the Hards and he was running quite well mid-race. Did he get screwed over by the SC too? Either way, what a weekend that could've been for him if everything worked out, what with Max pulling up again...
Was too early to pit for mediums when he wanted to, and when he did pit, he got dumped into traffic. Ran behind a DRS train which ate the tires & I believe he made a late stop which basically chucked him down the order.

You can see the state of his mediums here.
 
Max retiring for damn second time further gives me the vibe that this season would resemble 2005.

After 2021 resembles 2006 before, 24 year old rising star vs 36 year old 7-time WDC, weird mistakes of the 7-time WDCs (ex: Schumacher's Australia, Hamilton's Baku), involved in some controversial events, like Schumacher's Monaco stunt and Hamilton's Silverstone incident, but both (and their team) are making some comeback at 2nd half, Verstappen's first results being inverted version of Alonso's...

Now for 2022 with 2005, there's the previously dominating team taking a downturn, being distant 3rd behind the leading 2 teams, and drags down the 7-time WDC with it. The championship battle is now between the 2 rising stars only, but in particular, one of the stars is ineligible to enter F1, but instead had only 1 season in a midfield to prove his talent (especially regarding speed), and is immediately promoted to a race winning team, and then drove Newey designed cars that can go radical in design, giving them tons of mechanical problems. Of which both Kimi and Max are, though it's lack of experience for the former and age for the latter.
 
Last edited:
Max retiring for damn second time further gives me the vibe that this season would resemble 2005.

After 2021 resembles 2006 before, 24 year old rising star vs 36 year old 7-time WDC, weird mistakes of the 7-time WDCs (ex: Schumacher's Australia, Hamilton's Baku), involved in some controversial events, like Schumacher's Monaco stunt and Hamilton's Silverstone incident, but both (and their team) are making some comeback at 2nd half, Verstappen's first results being inverted version of Alonso's...

Now for 2022 with 2005, there's the previously dominating team taking a downturn, being distant 3rd behind the leading 2 teams, and drags down the 7-time WDC with it. The championship battle is now between the 2 rising stars only, but in particular, one of the stars is ineligible to enter F1, but instead had only 1 season in a midfield to prove his talent (especially regarding speed), and is immediately promoted to a race winning team, and then drove Newey designed cars that can go radical in design, giving them tons of mechanical problems. Of which both Kimi and Max are, though it's lack of experience for the former and age for the latter.
It would be more like 2005 if Red Bull had the fastest car, as so far neither of his retirements have come while he was leading the race and then gave it to Leclerc.
 
I didn't really catch either of the first two sportswashing grands prix, but I've just seen the qualifying highlights on C4 (I can't watch the race highlights until after the broadcast has finished, and might not bother)...

... and while I appreciate that this is a specific complaint that only UK viewers will understand, and likely personal preference, Alex Jacques is extremely hard to listen to; it's just a guessing game of what vowel he'll mangle next.

I recall thinking this previously on F1 Esports, the odd Goodwood event, and some lower formula stuff, but he's just getting worse. He was lead commentator last year too, but I don't recall it being this bad (edit: apparently I did mention it :lol: ) - and C4 is really my only option for race highlights other than F1's own YouTube.
 
Last edited:
0218FF48-7D98-4629-B3D0-E70B17D6BAEE.jpeg
 
OK I admit that this race wasn't as exciting as the first 2 but it wasn't crap either. I was satisfied with the result and enjoyed being there with the 129,000 odd spectators who were just happy to be out. We may not have the greatest track for racing but we have a passionate crowd who really gets into the action. It makes the whole thing worthwhile.

Before the weekend started I wasn't sure what to expect. I had hopes the track would deliver something truly special but I also had a few concerns based on what we've seen in previous years. I probably overhyped it, saying that there'd be a strategy game along with some more on-track overtakes to provide excitement. There weren't any bold strategy calls but there was a bit more overtaking so I guess it delivered in that regard. As Abu Dhabi proved, changing up a track's layout won't transform the way a race plays out because it's the same basic structure as before. The same inherent flaws are still there but that won't stop me from going back. Seeing the cars, hearing the cars and smelling the cars is an experience that you simply cannot replicate through a TV broadcast. Of course I'd like to get even closer and take proper pictures but anyway, it's great have F1 in Melbourne again.
 
Last edited:
With 3 fuel supply related DNFs in 3 races, Red Bull appear to be out of their depth as engine builders. I have no idea what Verstappen's escape clause is, but he should use it.
 
With 3 fuel supply related DNFs in 3 races, Red Bull appear to be out of their depth as engine builders. I have no idea what Verstappen's escape clause is, but he should use it.
This engine was 100% build by Honda and is cared by by Honda too. Red Bull Powertrains didn't build it and aren't servicing it.
 
With 3 fuel supply related DNFs in 3 races, Red Bull appear to be out of their depth as engine builders. I have no idea what Verstappen's escape clause is, but he should use it.
As you've handily noted, we're only 3 races into a season with a complete overhaul of the regs, up to and including the new fuel mixture which may or may not be playing a part in all this. Yes, he's had 2 DNF's already... and a race win. That car might be inherently unreliable at present but for crying out loud, it's not a boat that's miles off the pace.

As much as I'd personally like Max to move away from the RB brand, it's going to take a lot more than that for him to consider switching.
 
It would be more like 2005 if Red Bull had the fastest car, as so far neither of his retirements have come while he was leading the race and then gave it to Leclerc.
Forgot to say this, but at the first 3 races, McLaren at 2005 wasn't the fastest too, they lose pace to Renault at races like Bahrain. They started becoming the fastest after they sorted out something (that I forgot for now) since Imola.

Kimi had troubled first 2 races too that led him to score only 7 points at that time. In Australia his engine stalled and in Malaysia he got a puncture.
 
Last edited:
After Bahrain I thought Pirelli might this year contribute to interesting races with 2 stops that cater for more strategic variation... but same old got rolled out with a hard tyre that could do the full race distance.

Pretty boring race: I had bought tickets before the crapshoot of an end of season last year and I went along somewhat begrudgingly and expecting a crap race - it wasn't as bad as I expected.

The new cars in real life look pretty good and sound interesting. The queues for overpriced food and drinks, or for bathrooms, and for trams at the end of the day were not so good.
 
After Bahrain I thought Pirelli might this year contribute to interesting races with 2 stops that cater for more strategic variation... but same old got rolled out with a hard tyre that could do the full race distance.

Pretty boring race: I had bought tickets before the crapshoot of an end of season last year and I went along somewhat begrudgingly and expecting a crap race - it wasn't as bad as I expected.

The new cars in real life look pretty good and sound interesting. The queues for overpriced food and drinks, or for bathrooms, and for trams at the end of the day were not so good.
With the step of 2 grades between medium and soft there wasn't another way.
 
After Bahrain I thought Pirelli might this year contribute to interesting races with 2 stops that cater for more strategic variation... but same old got rolled out with a hard tyre that could do the full race distance.

Pretty boring race: I had bought tickets before the crapshoot of an end of season last year and I went along somewhat begrudgingly and expecting a crap race - it wasn't as bad as I expected.

The new cars in real life look pretty good and sound interesting. The queues for overpriced food and drinks, or for bathrooms, and for trams at the end of the day were not so good.
As soon as they talked about those record numbers, my first thought was, "I wonder if the venue has the same problem as COTA did" (although COTA's issues were more along resources & layout than queues).

400,000+ people is a lot & I don't know if any F1 venue is really setup to handle such numbers.
 
Last edited:
I still don't know how people were calling that a bad Grand Prix. Apart from a battle for the lead, there was loads going on. Safety Cars, crashes, overtakes in many places on the track, a really close midfield battle and a monster drive from Albon. It was a good race and just because a leader checks out it doesn't automatically make it boring.

Paul Ricard in 2018 and 2019 had some of the most overtakes of their respective seasons, but because Hamilton won by a country mile in both races, they were declared boring when they were anything but. 2021 French GP was exactly the same as 18 and 19, just with a battle for the lead this time, and then people are like "OMG worst track on the calendar did a good race". I wasn't surprised that Paul Ricard could produce and epic race because it already did. It also had some of the most non-DRS passes of all tracks, so everyone who moans that DRS is bad suddenly only likes tracks with it?

Removing the DRS zone at Melbourne actually meant there were DRS-free passes at Melbourne, and it was also into a corner that caused many mistakes. Melbourne was a great race (better than Jeddah), so I truly fail to understand all the hate it's getting.
 
Last edited:
I still don't know how people were calling that a bad Grand Prix. Apart from a battle for the lead, there was loads going on. Safety Cars, crashes, overtakes in many places on the track, a really close midfield battle and a monster drive from Albon. It was a good race and just because a leader checks out it doesn't automatically make it boring.

Paul Ricard in 2018 and 2019 had some of the most overtakes of their respective seasons, but because Hamilton won by a country mile in both races, they were declared boring when they were anything but. 2021 French GP was exactly the same as 18 and 19, just with a battle for the lead this time, and then people are like "OMG worst track on the calendar did a good race". I wasn't surprised that Paul Ricard could produce and epic race because it already did. It also had some of the most non-DRS passes of all tracks, so everyone who moans that DRS is bad suddenly only likes tracks with it?

Removing the DRS zone at Melbourne actually meant there were DRS-free passes at Melbourne, and it was also into a corner that caused many mistakes. Melbourne was a great race (better than Jeddah), so I truly fail to understand all the hate it's getting.
It wasn't the most exciting race but as far as non-dramatic races go, it was pretty damn good.

Reminds me of a classic Woody Allen quote: "Sex without love is an empty experience. But as far as empty experiences go, it's definitely one of the best"
 
Last edited:
Back