- 2,872
- United Kingdom
Nooo Lando
Two good drivers*2nd and 3rd. This is what happens when Red Bull support two good cars.
WheN WiLL yOu lEARn tHaT yOUr AcTioNs HaVe CoNseQUenCeS?
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/...-not-respecting-qualifying-etiquette/6312863/
This guy keeps showing how little he deserves to be on this grid.
Not defending the tool but to be fair today was mostly on his engineer putting him in that position. It's not a new issue at Haas putting their drivers in crappy positions.
WheN WiLL yOu lEARn tHaT yOUr AcTioNs HaVe CoNseQUenCeS?
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/...-not-respecting-qualifying-etiquette/6312863/
This guy keeps showing how little he deserves to be on this grid.
I get that people don't like him and its the default position to bash anything he does, but he didn't actually do anything wrong in qualifying? Otherwise the stewards would have called him in-front of them.
I get that people don't like him and its the default position to bash anything he does, but he didn't actually do anything wrong in qualifying? Otherwise the stewards would have called him in-front of them.
Which is why he also didn't face any sanction in Bahrain. It's not against the written rules to be an absolute fanny and ruin both your qualifying lap and another driver's qualifying lap by racing them on that lap, because it's simply not necessary to have that written down anywhere. Every driver knows that any compromise on lines results in a loss of speed and an increase in lap time, so they stay out of each other's way on Q laps.That's the gentleman's agreement part. A gentleman's agreement isn't a regulation so there's nothing to investigate. Just an unwritten code of respect and conduct.
It's literally half and half.
First half is impossible on slicks, second half will destroy any wet tyre. Interesting tactics coming upEven better, will some gamble on slicks?
At least they do a standing start afterwards nowIf they dare to start this behind the safety car...