- 4,772
- Netherlands
- PaMu1337
Uh oh
Did anyone hear that?
I missed it, what was said?This is going to get awkward...
Uh oh
Did anyone hear that?
I missed it, what was said?This is going to get awkward...
"Ten seconds for Perez"Uh oh
Did anyone hear that?
Meanwhile at DTS production: makes this a Sainz focused episode, with a storyline talking about his rivalry with <checks roulette wheel> BottasBut think of the drama when this is played on DTS.
Insert something thing about how Sainz looked up to Alonso and how Alonso's chance to beat Sainz blew up.Meanwhile at DTS production: makes this a Sainz focused episode, with a storyline talking about his rivalry with <checks roulette wheel> Bottas
When I commented this:Bottas couldn't have been more invisible in this race.
I actually had a little moment where I needed to make sure Bottas was even in this race at allMeanwhile at DTS production: makes this a Sainz focused episode, with a storyline talking about his rivalry with <checks roulette wheel> Bottas
They are at Red Bull this weekend...But think of the drama when this is played on DTS.
It would help if we knew the result of today's race first...So for Suzuka here's what Max needs to be champion there:
Gain 8 pts on Leclerc, 6 pts on Perez
So winning with FL would already do it, and winning without FL as long as Leclerc is not second.
This is assuming Perez keeps his win of courseIt would help if we knew the result of today's race first...
Breaking news: Results of the investigation will be out after the last race of the seasonIt would help if we knew the result of today's race first...
He wasn't. That was actually Heikki KovalainenWhen I commented this:
I actually had a little moment where I needed to make sure Bottas was even in this race at all
Another complete race of time later and still no result.
The FIA really haven't looked very good this weekend.
On the one hand he deserves the win but on the other hand how convenient the penalties were just enough to keep the win.Decision is in:
1st SC: Reprimand
2nd SC: 5 sec and 2 penalty points
Perez wins!
When questioned during the hearing PER said that the conditions were very wet and that it was very difficult to closely follow the safety car with little heat in his tyres and brakes.
Although the track was wet in parts, we do not accept that the conditions were such as to make it impossible or dangerous for PER to have maintained the required less than 10 car length gap.
Nevertheless, we took into account the wet conditions and the difficulties highlighted by PER as mitigatory circumstances for this incident and, accordingly, determine that a reprimand ought to be imposed.
As this was the second breach of Article 55.10 by PER during the race and followed an express warning from the Race Director, we determined to impose a 5 second time penalty on PER.
If Leclerc hadn't degraded, he could've been inside 5 seconds.On the one hand he deserves the win but on the other hand how convenient the penalties were just enough to keep the win.
If I were Ferrari I'd seriously be questioning that. Well, if there was more at stake anyway.
Ferrari even told him during the race to keep within 5 seconds, as that was what they were expecting. Only later after the finish they told him there was a chance for a double 5 sec, but they didn't sound very confident about it anywayIf Leclerc hadn't degraded, he could've been inside 5 seconds.
1 more lap for Perez and Leclerc would have been 10 seconds behind.If Leclerc hadn't degraded, he could've been inside 5 seconds.