That screenshot is actually from Gran Turismo 5 Prologue.
In what way is the lighting "almost exact same"? Also, what is "pre-baked" about the shadows and what's "fake" about the reflections?
The worst AI in a current racer? Not the best, but definitely not the worst. I've had fairly competent races on unbeatable. However, I still don't understand how what 2006 graphics entails - would you be able to elaborate on that one?
I'm hard pressed to find a game that ticks all of those boxes that you've laid out. Even taking into account the over-exaggerations.
Aside from Pcars, which other games are dynamic?
Yeah and the opinion said doesn't hold up either in game. However, what does that matter any when a picture was posted of photomode of a different game? Or is this just a onesided argument you're trying to make, essentially meaning it's only ok to compare photomode pictures of one game you're in favor of, and in-game of one youre not?
Forza motorsport 7 is probably one of the few games that looks the same on (pc) as in photomode without changing the graphics (outside bokeh and blur obviously).
They are on some mission the last months, they keep bashing Forza's graphics lately. Its like becoming a trend now, they don't see the fault or cut outs of there fav game but can notice anything bad in Forza like a expert wich is funny.
As soon as someone uses the word triggered, they get put in my "ignored" box.
No one's triggered. it was literally a fairly straight-forward response to something that you said that makes no sense. If there's anyone getting triggered here, it's you trying to tip the scales in favor of one game.
I can only see the aliasing difference, Care to point out what reflections you're talking about? On console, it's actually not as bad as what you're showing here. The Aliasing looks terrible on there and I don't recall it ever looking that bad on my Xbox.
Yes it make sense, just look at the photos that i posted to you lol
No it doesn't make sense to tell someone to post in-game photos(as if photomode photo's aren't allowed) when the photos being compared where IN PHOTOMODE. You seem to be completely missing this point, even when its repeated multiple times.
Something that can very well boil down to the location of the actual camera. That's also very easy to acknowledge. However, you're right, it does look very slightly different. You'd figure it'd be glaringly obvious, and all over the vehicle, sticking out like a sore thumb, like you're painting it out to be though.
Well that's because the LOD of the vehicle is already lowered completely before the game even starts. What you see in Scapes is not even remotely the same as what you see in game in that regard.
Yeah, and like I said, the LOD is already lower from the get go in-game so there's no alternating inbetween the two modes. That's why regardless if its photomode or in game on GTS, you have constant issue with Rim's and obvious polygonal issues.
Forzavista actually matches more to what you see in game compared to scapes. I don't think anything changes between LOD in Forza. I believe someone has shown this before. @TheAdmiester I think?
And that is with a game that is just as graphically demanding, possibly even more so, being brought down to 30FPS.I'm using Horizon 3 for this comparison as I can use the debug build to manually switch LODs. Forza 7 works the same.
I'll compare the A110 since it's the focus of this thread, with the debug overlay enabled showing the active LOD of the car. LOD -1 is Forzavista, and LOD 0 is the gameplay LOD. Both sets of pictures show the Forzavista model first.
Flick between the two images and you'll see that on the exterior of the car, there's no difference. The window tint changes slightly and the passenger side wiper's curvature changes, but there's no difference in detail to be seen anywhere.
Inside the car, in the case of the Alpine, there's actually no difference at all. Again the tint has changed, but in this one even the pedals (not shown) are present in LOD 0.
So in the case of the Alpine, the only difference whatsoever is that the Forzavista model has the engine and hidden bits (such as the doorshuts) present, with no detail difference in what the player actually sees in gameplay.
Yes because all the other games have 3d trees
GTS does adds higher lod model, more reflections and higher quality reflections, higher draw distance, higher quality shadows and more track details. Forza doesn't do any of this and you say it less in GTS? And your image is not maxed out and is not the correct possition in photomode plus uncorrect sliders.
My man, this is what i mean, they just keep ignoring that photomode lod in Forza is the same lod as the gameplay model. But funny enought they can't see the lod difference and other graphical improvements in GTS or other games in photomode.
Have you tried the One X with the 60FPS mode on Horizon? Graphically, there isn't many major differences and really makes me wonder how it would have panned out if they gave it a shot with Motorsport. In regard to physics, I know that Motorsport will take more processing, but it leaves me wondering..
I'm triggered by your post.
Will do the same.
With dynamic Night AND rain at that. "But but but, we have SS Route X, and it doesn't look 2006" Gotta love try hards.
