No. I loved Old Fuji. New Fuji is very much a Tilke track, and there is very little of the track the was changed that I can stand compared to Fuji '90s.Am I the only person who finds Fuji an utterly bizarre track and really hates it?
Annoyingly difficult corners are a Hermann Tilke trademark, I personally don't like his tracks much, they are difficult for the sake of being difficult, not enjoyable.
I'm just running around it in the DB9 on S2's for the time trial. I've gotten a bit better on it, but I still feel the entries to a lot of the corners are very "vague". On several corners you enter the corner from the center of the track rather than the traditional
wide entry-sweep in-sweep out
and also don't have room to run wide so must contain your exit to the middle of the track to prepare for the next corner. It's just feels very "wafty" and imprecise.
I've started to brake differently for some corners. Instead of the usual situation where you would be hard on the brakes in a straight line, before turning into the corner and powering on from the clipping point onwards, I'm now braking softer but for longer whilst turning towards the apex gradually. Trail-braking to an extent I guess you could call it. This is the only way I can get the car pointing in the right direction when it reaches the apex, and also make the late-apex that a lot of the corners need due to them becoming tighter on the exit.
I find that the last two corners are particularly awkward due to the exit being a bit unsighted (I play in-car view) due to the gradient of the circuit.
For me this track is with the Ring where I have a love/hate relationship with it. It's one of those tracks where you hate it when you first start because it just seems overly difficult, than as you get more time on it it get's easier and a little more fun. Although it probably has to have one of the worst 1st corners, right up there with Mugello and Sebring.
Fuji is far from the worst track ever.. but what always got me about it is how F1 decided to adopt it over Suzuka (excluding the commercial reasons at the time). Comparing Fuji to Suzuka is not even apples to oranges, more like filet mignon to cat food. How or why F1 (or anyone with a right mind found Fuji more suited over Suzuka (not to mention many other still better tracks in Japan) amazes me (again, I'm ignoring the commercial reason which I know at the time were the primary driver).
Needless to say I was glad to see F1 return to it's rightful Japanese home, Suzuka!
On that note I can think of 5 or 7 tracks in Japan I'd rather drive than Fuji (Best Motoring's Touge circuit included)...
Thats easy to explain:
1. Like you said, you're ignoring: Money, money, money!
2. Toyota owns Fuji, Honda owns Suzuka. All Toyota does is throw a bit more money at Bernie and hey presto its favoured. Then when things went pear-shaped, Toyota pulled out of their contract to swap year on year with Suzuka, so we're back to Suzuka permanently for the time being.
3. These are the only 2 tracks in Japan that are suitable for F1 these days as far as I know, and are the only two that are licensed to hold an F1 race.
4. The 2 Grand Prix at Fuji were both fairly exciting, one featured an insane wet race and the other a pretty awesome victory for Alonso, but I agree, Suzuka is way better.
Fuji is a boring
You find ovals less boring than fuji? Okay then...I would take basically any oval over it.
Am I the only person who finds Fuji an utterly bizarre track and really hates it?
Great big wide track, no real markers, very vague corners that seem to have no real line and are so tight it's beyond a joke, some I can't even get enough steering lock on to get around, utterly bland and without character.
How on earth they ever managed to get the deal to host F1 in alternate years to Suzuka (one of the wordls top 3 tracks) is beyond me.
I dread to think how many events in GT5 are going to use this god-awful track.
end rant.
I used to hate this track in GT4 but I've got used to it in GT5P and that's the key for me. If you are at least semi-good at a track you will like it and if you are not you won't like it.
Although it probably has to have one of the worst 1st corners, right up there with Mugello and Sebring.
I think you have to watch this video (in its entirety) to appreciate the track:
I've got to weigh in against Fuji as well. As many have said, yes, it's basically a personal preference issue...[snipped for brevity]
Yes, the new Fuji is challenging and that can be frustrating, but there are scads of other extremely challenging tracks from GT4 that I found to be among my favorites - the Nordschliefe, Monaco, and Infineon/Sears Point come immediately to mind. Those tracks, though challenging, were interesting. So now that I've typed all this out, I guess what I'm saying is that Fuji is technically difficult and mind-numbingly dull at the same time. Not my favorite combination.
once you know what lines to take and to hit the late apexes its a joy to race there!
If you are at least semi-good at a track you will like it and if you are not you won't like it.
I've got to weigh in against Fuji as well. As many have said, yes, it's basically a personal preference issue, but I think a LOT of it has to do with the fact that when the track was redesigned for 2005, the designers kept the basic shape and path of the the pre-existing track. WHY they did this I'm not sure - cost effectiveness combined with an attempt to maintain a semblance of the "iconic" trackmap and its related buildings is my guess - but it's resulted in a catastrophically awkward mix of fetishistically technical curves and salt-flat-style straights. An American analog would be attempting to remap an entirely new course on top of Laguna Seca - it could be done, but I doubt the results would be impressive.
Yes, the new Fuji is challenging and that can be frustrating, but there are scads of other extremely challenging tracks from GT4 that I found to be among my favorites - the Nordschliefe, Monaco, and Infineon/Sears Point come immediately to mind. Those tracks, though challenging, were interesting. So now that I've typed all this out, I guess what I'm saying is that Fuji is technically difficult and mind-numbingly dull at the same time. Not my favorite combination.
i actually really like fuji, but in my opinion any track from GT5p should be cut, ive played them so many times its going to be a chore once GT5 comes out and im forced to race any of them
...the only fact that u dont like it says for the fact that u dont have experience driving on it, i know this because my first feelings over the track was something that u feel.
Again, why is it assumed that those who don't like the 2005 GT version of Fuji is automatically thought of as inferior drivers?
Is it mutually exclusive to dislike the track & be proficient at going around it at a rapid pace?
(I asked this question halfway up this page & still have not gotten an answer).
Because its a human nature to dislike/hate/detaste/dont like something that u r not good at, cause everytime u screw up it hurts your EGO (mine, somebodyelse's, everybody's), thats why I came to a conclusion that the dude is not good at all at fuji, cause otherwise he would love it, cause again its a human nature to lilke being victorious (you r good at the track - u win - u like it).
Because its a human nature to dislike/hate/detaste/dont like something that u r not good at, cause everytime u screw up it hurts your EGO (mine, somebodyelse's, everybody's), thats why I came to a conclusion that the dude is not good at all at fuji, cause otherwise he would love it, cause again its a human nature to lilke being victorious (you r good at the track - u win - u like it).