And you wouldn't take the opportunity to take a nice photo on the side of the road that no one was using because the road is also a one-way road because of the construction etc.?
You realize the only reason this started is because you cool storied us about calling the cops on some guys revving their engines, because "safety." If you weren't trying to boast about being a buzzkill, I doubt anyone would have mentioned your mediocre avatar and the fact you parked it on a public road to take it.
As for the rest of your rant, I love when people take pictures. I also love when they realize their short comings in doing so and don't try to justify poor work as "art" and then use technically terms incorrectly. Your use of the term overexposure is pretty much on par with some kid claiming his Civic was drifting because the front tires spun. Yeah.
I know, right? Azuremen patrolling the internet, telling people which photos and avatars they're not allowed to post. The definition of immature.
I don't care what images or avatars you post. I was being snarky about your claim of "the best photo of my car in a while" being a blurry, unexposed shot with little thought of the composition, stating that your time of purchase photos looked much better. You then went off defending it as art and a bunch of other terms you don't know the meaning of, ultimately ending with personal attacks.
Art isn't about rules and regulations. It's about capturing the creativity of the mind.
...and it is still better than your own avatar, which I'd say is over-exposed. Nice curtains.
But by all means, invoke Godwin's Law 2.0 and compare me to a brutal dictator. While insulting my hair.
Azuremen should just let people take the photos that they want to without shoving criticism down people's throats.
You realize people come to me to learn about photography, right?
But instead you've decided to endless take everything as an attack, use horrible analogies to defend yourself, ultimately falling back to personal attacks and "I'm the victim" claims.
