The only FWD car that really fits that is the M100 Elan and even then a lot of people consider that a "sporty" car not an actual sports car.
Made by Lotus, who only make sportscars and racecars.
Full double-wishbone suspension.
All-aluminum backbone chassis, similar to the Elise.
What?
From Merriam Webster, free of any liberal/conservative editing efforts by the general net-populace:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sports car
Main Entry: sports car
Function: noun
Date: 1928 (and free, apparently, of all this new age rewriting of car classes)
: a low small usually 2-passenger automobile designed for quick response, easy maneuverability, and high-speed driving
-
Low, small, 2-passenger-plus-legless-midgets, designed for quick response, easy maneuverability and high speed driving:
-
What different people think will obviously differ based on their biases. And legal car classes don't often agree with "common sense", though neither side has very much of it.
But anyone who dismisses this:
As unworthy of their time because it's not a sportscar is missing out on a hell of a lot of fun.
But of course, you could make the same argument about heavyweight vehicles, too...
I remember reading one report complaining about how tail-happy the Ford/Mazda Ranger platform is... seriously... that's a
bad thing?