I'm with Greyfox and Blitz... 5 years is too light a sentence. I'm honestly shocked that nobody's gotten killed from this swatting nonsense yet. It's only a matter of time before footage from a swatting ends up on Best Gore.
This is nuts. When you think of this stuff, in context with what happened to Daniel Shaver in Arizona....it's beyond scary.
For anyone who isn't aware, look up the Daniel Shaver shooting on YouTube...it's one of the most disgusting and disturbing things I've ever seen.
In the video you watched, did it mentioned the fact that the the shooter had "You're :censored:ed" enscribed on the barrel of his rifle.I saw that Daniel Shaver shooting on 4chan just yesterday. Like you said, disgusting and disturbing: the cops were extremely hostile to Daniel, and all it took was a single, slow arm movement towards his waist for one of them to draw fire on him as if he was about to blow up a nuclear bomb or something. It's even more disgusting once you notice they drew fire AFTER he showed he had nothing in his hand, as opposed to shooting right at the moment his hand was on his waist. When trained cops can't even control their own guns, how do they expect a DRUNK dude who is scared to death to control his actions? When the cop tells Shaver to crawl towards him he doesn't wait until the Daniel's hands even reached the floor before he shouts at him "CRAWL TOWARDS ME!!", Jesus Christ...
On this topic: I have no doubt the swatter deserves the harshest penalty, followed by the cop. Regarding the guy that gave out the fake address, I haven't got enough info to make a determination. But truth is, it is absolutely the swatter's fault: it was his decision to swat the other person, and the cops only responded to that call (whether they carried out their task poorly is entirely another thing).
In the video you watched, did it mentioned the fact that the the shooter had "You're :censored:ed" enscribed on the barrel of his rifle.
"Excessive Force Demonstrated By Law Enforcement"? Oh wait, this thread is about SWATting...I think that a change in topic title would be appropriate given the circumstances.
Don't know what it should be called. All that I know is that this is a separate incident being discussed in this thread, and thus a change in title is appropriate."Excessive Force Demonstrated By Law Enforcement"? Oh wait, this thread is about SWATting...
Seems like the SWAT team should have probably broken a window and tear gassed the house or used flash bangs to disorient the SWAT-ee.
Or not blindly fallen for a prank phone call.Or just tased him.
The orchestrator, the address giver, and the person who commissioned the Swatting
Or not blindly fallen for a prank phone call.
Knowing how triggerhappy the US cops can be, I wonder if this can be seen a contract killing.
What glaringly obvious attribute do you imagine said prank call possessed that one could "blindly fall for?"Or not blindly fallen for a prank phone call.
Investigation works, also there are many ways they could have handled it better than rushing in and shooting an innocent man through no fault of his own.Because one can smell a prank through a phone.
Investigation works, also there are many ways they could have handled it better than rushing in and shooting an innocent man through no fault of his own.
Accepting this sort of police action is absurd and it's one of the reasons I have never and most likely will never call the police.
Yes you do, I'm not talking about csi here just some common sense steps I'm sure are protocol. The fact people are willing to accept and even defend the police action here is alarming.you don't have time to investigate.
Yes you do, I'm not talking about csi here just some common sense steps I'm sure are protocol. The fact people are willing to accept and even defend the police action here is alarming.
If every minute counts, which usually is the case in something like a hostage situation, you don't have time to investigate. The cop should have been less trigger happy, but it seems that that slips through the cracks way too often, at least in the US.
For the man being swatted, those who were part of it should be tried for first or second degree murder.
The fact that you're so focused on the response that you seem to be ignoring what incited it is alarming.The fact people are willing to accept and even defend the police action here is alarming.
Here as in, over this particular incident and not here as in at gtp. Sorry if I didn't write that out so well.Who is defending the police action?
Yes you do, I'm not talking about csi here just some common sense steps I'm sure are protocol. The fact people are willing to accept and even defend the police action here is alarming.
Physical observation would go a long way, or I could just knock on your door and shoot you lol.Example scenario: Say I'm having an afternoon neighbourhood party at my house and I pull out a gun and shoot a guest dead and hold everyone else hostage. There are 15 people at my house who've seen someone die and no one knows who or when the next person will die because I finally lost it. Someone calls in saying at my address someone was killed and many others are hostage inside. How do you investigate whether I'm really having this party without wasting time to verify that the caller is serious about their claim? What are these common sense steps? It's daylight out and everyone would have walked because they live right next to me so no cars sitting out front.
murder around 1000 people every year.
What's terrifying is to know SWAT teams can be puppeteered like this.
You're all over the road like a hacked autonomous vehicle.The police in the United States are way too trigger happy and murder around 1000 people every year. It's not very easy to find the information on a case by case basis and of course the majority are justified but still.