syntex123
Staff Emeritus
- 4,884
- Tønsberg, Norway
- syntex123
- Syntex260Z
No tomato?Someone failed to notice it was a sarcastic posted. I edited it anyway, because potato.
No tomato?Someone failed to notice it was a sarcastic posted. I edited it anyway, because potato.
It’s positive for the reviewers they can play and relax without the pressure of having to write, edit and publish something on short notice. For everyone else it makes next to no difference whether they have 8 or 12 days to review it.I know some people are worried about the fact that the embargo lifts only two days before launch but might it be a positive that reviewers will have close to two weeks with the game?
I know some people are worried about the fact that the embargo lifts only two days before launch but might it be a positive that reviewers will have close to two weeks with the game?
How is anyone supposed to tell that's sarcastic? You posted an opinion with some routine IGN bashing. That's gaming internet 101.Someone failed to notice it was a sarcastic posted. I edited it anyway, because potato.
If the ability does exist to individually select AI, chance to weed out the rabbit & get closer racingMain thing I care about is custom race. Can’t wait to see how it functions.
I get the feeling this attitude will perpetuate a disappointing future for GT games.As long as it doesn’t look worse than GTS I’m happy with whatever we get
I get the feeling this attitude will perpetuate a disappointing future for GT games.
So what's the point in paying so much money for a new game. Reminds me of all these other new games being pumped out without much or any graphic improvements or content. Yes we need to compromise because of the PS5 shortage but if Sony see that they they can start to pump out future GT games without any graphic improvements it will be an extremely disappointing change in philosophy. I suspect this is the way it will go and Sony can once again rely on the massive fanbase to buy whatever they instruct PD to produce.
If the extra content in GT7 without a graphics and probably physics improvement is really worth £50 to someone without realising it's a comprise then that's on them.
GT7 would look better than it does currently on PS5?it’d look a lot better
this is honestly nonsense to me. It looks great right now, and on top of that it still would be using older techniques from when they were developing the game on PS4 before porting over. All Sony games started life in some way using PS4. This is why we are getting all these games so early in the PS5s life, vs situations like GT6 being locked on an older platform instead of on PS4.If GT7 didn’t come out on PS4 I’m sure it’d look a lot better, because it wouldn’t need to be last-gen cross play compatible
The environments would probably look better than they already are, I'm not sure how much better they can get the car models to look though. They're stunning.GT7 would look better than it does currently on PS5?
Car models imo have been pretty much perfected by them, now they just need to work more with lighting and reflections and at least from what ive seen they have a large jump early and I think their next version they will jump even more in that regard. Hopefully we see them achieve Raytraced reflections etc at a higher frame rate in gameplay some day(I dont expect to see it on PS5) I think what we are seeing esp how they are doing weather and lighting is really masterful esp for a year 2 game on a new console.The environments would probably look better than they already are, I'm not sure how much better they can get the car models to look though. They're stunning.
this is honestly nonsense to me. It looks great right now, and on top of that it still would be using older techniques from when they were developing the game on PS4 before porting over. All Sony games started life in some way using PS4. This is why we are getting all these games so early in the PS5s life, vs situations like GT6 being locked on an older platform instead of on PS4.
On top of that the PS4 to PS5 transition is way different than any other generation where for the first time ever they pretty much brought over a ton of what they did development environment wise on PS4 and extended things on PS5. There was a reason why cerny said people could dev on a PS5 with zero Prior knowledge.
The only enemy to devs is time, not technology. Horizon Forbidden west is an example of that people thought they wouldnt be able to have flying in the game because of PS4 and they did it despite that.
You would be getting the same product with or without PS4 in mind, just sony never revealing that the game started life on PS4.
We are getting extremely mature 1st gen games for the first time ever vs the prolouge like games of the past And having a full game way later in the generation.
^ This. I think GT is and always has looked amazing. All I meant is that other areas can be improved. Car wise it’s not much to gain except damage modelling.The environments would probably look better than they already are, I'm not sure how much better they can get the car models to look though. They're stunning.
I think that is where I’m at. My heart wants it to surpass GT4 scores. But we will see. It feels like this one is special though.I'm predicting around 8.5s, around The Batman type scores. Won't be the best reviewed racing game but it will be viewed as a strong return to form for the series.
IGN gave it a 9?! good for them,was expecting 7 1/2-8 at best.IGN gave a 9, GameSpot has "Review in progress" thing, gave an 8. Will likely settle around 85 on Metacritic, which would be the highest average since GT4.
This is that gamestop partial review....brings up good points about the cars being old.
Classic cars are one thing, but new cars should be the new models.
Which makes me think this is just another cash grab from PD similar to GT5 then GT6....
Underrated critique.This is that gamestop partial review....brings up good points about the cars being old.
Classic cars are one thing, but new cars should be the new models.