Why are you guys still taking Nathan that seriously? Just go watch his post history if you haven't seen the pattern of his posts already. He constantly hypes, and hypes, and hypes some more what the future of GT7 will be, and all of the time without any source for any of his wishful thinking posts to be credible.
Also let me tell you right now before any replies come up with this.
A game selling well doesn't mean it's a good game. Especially not with Gran Turismo because of its unique circumstances where its main rivals don't even share the same console and thus it pretty much has the monopoly for the genre, and above that, it's being mostly sustained by the great achievements of the past games of the franchise, the games that made millions of people, fall in love with the franchise. It also, greatly, helps that it had some good marketing behind it, namely when it comes to using "nostalgia", which is always an incredible weapon to use when it comes to market a game who had incredible success in the past in most aspects.
Which is why people are buying it. GT7 is a comercial success, it was always bound to be. GT5 and GT6 despite its main downgrades and flaws, still sold incredibly well.
Why get upset at people for having a different opinion? I'll recommend this game to any GT or car fan. Most people I know are done with a typical AAA release after 3 weeks. So yeah, GT7 is a very different proposition and will be played for multiple years.
I'm the one that's upset here?
And what's with you bringing up "people you know"? Why the hell should I give a crap about the few dozen or so people you know in comparison to the millions who make the statistics?
Just go look through the trophy list of GT7 and try to explain to me how even the most basic and entry-game level trophies that pretty much just require a couple of hours of gameplay (even without any intention) are in the low % of completion? And we're not talking about "people we know", we're talking about literally every PSN account here.
That pretty much means to me that a very huge part of the people who bought this game hardly play it as well after a few days or so, much like the AAA games you are trying to group GT7 with.
The fact you even stated in the first place that you need "3 years" to judge GT7 propperly is pretty telling of how you are trying to cope with how much of a disaster the game turned out to be as a game, and still is, and are just HOPING for it to be better.
Otherwise you wouldn't even state this line
AT ALL. You would just state GT7 is great and you recomend it, period, if you truly felt secure of the game's current state.
Imagine... just using blatant double standards of time to judge games because the game you like quite clearly is in a piss poor state at launch/currently but you don't want to admit it. <You, basically.