The McLaren is still competitive. And Manu races are not like the dailies where everyone picks the same car. Most of the times you will find 6 or more different cars or manufacturers. So if you can be fast with that car go for it and you will be competitive. There could be rounds where it is not the best , but you may end up in a lobby where the McLaren is the best.I'm thinking of going with McLaren for Manu in gt2. What do you think? Still worth it considering the latest nerfs?
Nothing like that. I'm not trying to game the point system. If I'm lucky, nobody else in my area will pick the same one and I'll automatically be at the top of my local ranking and get more credits, but that isn't my main motivation.What is the advantage of picking least popular manufacturers? @Moose78
The final standings take that into account or just your region and all Manus are mixed?
Thanks for the info. I had some time today so put the Dodge, Hyundai, Ford, McLaren and Subaru through a 5 lap BOP'd custom race at Deep Forest.Here's the final installment in the shootout of Canada's least popular manufacturers from last season's Manu Cup GT1 league. For this one, we are at Suzuka for the 35-lap race in Rd.4. Since the race is so long and the results from the other rounds showed that several of the cars just weren't going to be viable (more on that below), I only tested two: Dodge and Hyundai.
Manufacturer Model Best Time Total Time Avg Time Avg Dev Hyundai Genesis Gr.3 2:03.810 72:49.920 2:04.855 0:00.698 Dodge Viper SRT GT3-R '15 2:03.835 73:08.970 2:05.399 0:00.833
Tire tread levels at finish:
Manufacturer Front Left Front Right Rear Left Rear Right Hyundai 40% 35% 55% 60% Dodge 35% 30% 45% 45%
Both of the cars easily lasted the full race without a pit stop and both gradually lost time to the fatigue of the tires and/or the driver. You can see by the lap times, that I made a mess of a few laps in both cars.
I was faster and more consistent with the Hyundai. It felt pretty good on the track overall, but I found the gearing going into the Esses a bit awkward -- 3rd didn't quite make it there, and going to 4th for a split second only to drop back to 3rd wasn't gaining me any time.
The Dodge was fine at Suzuka. Although I wasn't as consistent with it as the Hyundai, there weren't any parts of the track that were particularly troublesome. It seems I just wasn't driving well.
All the raw data is in the spreadsheet here.
As for the other manufacturers I tested...
Citroen - I struggled to drive this car consistently. I could get good Opt Times out of it, but I just wasn't able to get there reliably.
Renault - This is a really nice car to drive, but with the recent BoP update, it just isn't fast enough (at least, not in my hands).
Suzuki - I've come to the conclusion that I just can't drive this car. It was near the bottom at every track I took it to.
In the end, it came down to a choice between Dodge and Hyundai.
The Hyundai is a really nice drive. It's stable and predictable. No drama with this car ever. It was the fastest at Interlagos and Suzuka and near the top everywhere else. Good on fuel and tires. Just a great all-round car.
The Dodge, though, took the top spot at three of the tracks -- Deep Forest, Daytona, and Fuji -- and by a healthy margin at each. It really surprised me. The testing that I'd prior to the Manu Cup schedule being announced showed it to be a mediocre car, at best. But it really seems to shine for those three races.
So...
View attachment 1352927
And here they are dressed up in their native habit of Detroit, Michigan (with the driver looking longingly at the Gr.4 car that he won't ever get to drive in the series):
View attachment 1352931
Don't forget to double-check fuel mileage. At least in non-BoP'ed form, the Dodge is a thirsty beast.Thanks for the info. I had some time today so put the Dodge, Hyundai, Ford, McLaren and Subaru through a 5 lap BOP'd custom race at Deep Forest.
The Dodge was the standout and was consistently 0.5 secs ahead of anything else. It's a little tail happy and feels a bit floaty, it can clearly smoke through tyres but no doubt it is fast.
McLaren is my usual pick so I tested this first, super planted as usual but couldn't get it into the 27's. I even did a second session with it and the Dodge to double-check the results. Both had a slight improvement but the gap remained.
Times were:
- Dodge 1:27:5 (and consistently in the '27s)
- Hyundai 1:28:0 (easy to drive, smooth and consistent)
- Subaru 1:28:1 (possible to drive hard and catch slides)
- McLaren 1:28.2 (planted but was expecting more pace)
- Ford LM 1:28.5 (more pace in this but not the easiest to drive)
That surprised me! May need to have a quick shootout between the Dodge and Hyundai at the Nords...
I've done full-length races for all six of this season's rounds and fuel hasn't been an issue an any of them, at least not for me. The way the races are constructed this season, with the mandatory pits and shorter sprint formats, the Viper is never in any danger of needing to make an extra stop or fuel-saving. Even for the 35-lap race at Suzuka, I had 2 laps of fuel left at the end.Don't forget to double-check fuel mileage. At least in non-BoP'ed form, the Dodge is a thirsty beast.
I made this exact mistake in the last exhibition season here. I saved about 5 seconds in the pit by not changing tyres, but the deterioration of the tyres, meant I lost about 8 seconds over the last 2 laps. A tyre change will help with consistency, and you won't be worrying about an impending spin out, which is very possible at the Green Hell.I did a little bit of strategy testing for the 4-lap GT1 Rd1 race at Nurburgring yesterday. There don't seem to be many variables here. There is a mandatory pit. The main question is whether to take new tires or not.
For me, driving the Dodge, I feel like taking fresh tires at the midpoint is the best choice. It looks like I lose 4 seconds on the final lap if I skip the tire change, but with the length of the track and inconsistencies in my driving of it, I don't have a lot of confidence in the accuracy of that number. Anyways, I could definitely feel the tires slipping more towards the end of the race if I didn't change them. To reduce the risk of late-race spin-outs, I feel it is safer to do the tire change, regardless of whether it is actually faster or not, so that's what I'm planning for.
Of course, if there is rain, the weather will dictate when to pit and switch tires. I'm not going to bother testing for that.
It's actually a very competent car, I almost put my signature on the dotted line, but the allure of Porsche was too much for me unfortunately. I found sticking -1 brake balance helped keep the car composed, as it had a tendency to snap oversteer out of slow speed corners. Good luck!Deciding to go with Hyundai for the Manu series for ships and squiggles. Hopefully I'm the only one in Canada and in GT1 for those sweet sweet credits. It's a bit of clunker to drive and second gear is pretty deadly but I'm looking forward to getting stronger in an FR racer. Good luck everyone!
On another note, it looks like everyone we'd expect to see has qualified for the Nations cup.
Nurb 24 is such a big track, that the 5 seconds you'll gain by not changing tyres, will be eaten up over the next 2 laps. This is just my opinion, based on experience. But go with your gut.Really torn on the tire change for tomorrow. Just a ran in a lobby, no tire change. Great race, smooth and relatively quick (for me), and still had 50% life left at the end which aligns with my initial test and seems a change is unnecessary.
But seeing several people here, and a couple streamer practice lobbies today, I’m now doubting myself. I guess I’ll just check the gaps and decide on the fly…
The last time I drove for Alfa, was in GT Sport and it was my most enjoyable and successful season, in all the years playing GT Sport. I think they've finally got the car right in GT7 after all the updates. It's a sleeper at Daytona RC. Good luck for the season ahead.I’ve chosen Alfa for the season. It’s not the best Gr3 available, but I fell in love with the way it drives in the Exhibition season. It also helps that it is drop-dead gorgeous.
Given how unpopular it is, I was pretty sure I would be right up there for GT1 in Australia… but now I find out that Andrew Lee has picked it as well.
Just over 4 hours until the green hell.
No reports of rain so far (oceana region races I think it's a 4 lap dry sprint. Make sure you've got your rain tyres just in case.I'd love to hear about the weather at the Nordschleife. Is it a rainy race like the last time in Manu Cup?
I've been paying attention to this a little more recently.Post race screen says I've gained DR, but I don't know how is that possible being door 1 and P6.
You took DR points from the 10 drivers behind you but only gave up points to the 5 ahead. Even though it is weighted based on your starting DR, the points you gained from the cars behind outweighs what you gave up to the cars ahead.Post race screen says I've gained DR, but I don't know how is that possible being door 1 and P6.
You finished P6 so gained DR from 10 people behind and only lost it to 5 in front.Post race screen says I've gained DR, but I don't know how is that possible being door 1 and P6.
Finishing position is all that matters. You take DR from the people you beat and lose it to people who beat you. The exchange of points depends on the difference in starting DR between you - you take more from and lose less to people with higher DR, and lose more to and take less from people with lower DR - but ultimately if you beat more people than you lose to you will gain DR.Post race screen says I've gained DR, but I don't know how is that possible being door 1 and P6.