What this means is that come October we will have the game.
November or December when Playstation will announce PS5 for Fall of 2018, and then we do all this over again.
I feel the same 'Again with this?' statement, but that 'almost every car game looks fantastic', that's your opinion.Again with this? In a time when almost every car game looks fantastic, this statement holds no value.
Its a statement that is shared between many, many people. I haven't found an ugly game this generation that is set to come out soon. They all look damn beautiful, even NFS Payback, but thats something to be weary of. I can't wrap my head around why anyone would disagree.I feel the same 'Again with this?' statement, but that 'almost every car game looks fantastic', that's your opinion.
I was seriously considering getting GTS despite my reservations about the actual game, but this just reminded me of the rollercoaster of bullshot that was GT6 and the futureproof nonsense back then that seems to have had zero benifit/involvement in this current title.
I seriously think Kaz is some sort of hyper-perfectionist living in a bubble at PD and not enough in practical reality. It's just such a shame because there is so much to like about GT games but also so much disappointment and wasted potential, it's like a dysfunctional relationship to be a (buying) fan of this series lol.
Its a statement that is shared between many, many people. I haven't found an ugly game this generation that is set to come out soon. They all look damn beautiful, even NFS Payback, but thats something to be weary of. I can't wrap my head around why anyone would disagree.
Why is it expected? Those expectations are being hit by all these games coming out, to be honest. The only reason I can see someone disagreeing with it is because they favor one game so much that they unreasonably deduce that anything other than that game is bad. It's a statement that doesn't make any sense, considering how pretty much every game is bringing their own level of beauty, and doing it exceptionally well.It's expected though. With higher graphical power, people have higher expectations. And with diminishing returns, the gap and differences get subtler.
Why is it expected? Those expectations are being hit by all these games coming out, to be honest. The only reason I can see someone disagreeing with it is because they favor one game so much that they unreasonably deduce that anything other than that game is bad. It's a statement that doesn't make any sense, considering how pretty much every game is bringing their own level of beauty, and doing it exceptionally well.
Save your cash and get the xbox. Future proofing yourself!I'm going to buy Project Cars 2 first and wait for people to review GTS and if its as bad as I think then I will not buy it. Or maybe I should just buy the xbox and get project cars 2 and Forza.
Yeah, but the level of graphical quality when specifically talking about these few racing games, the only ones I've been talking about, is through the roof right now. All of them are outright beautiful so it still doesn't make much sense to bring in a comparison of game that is comparably awful in comparison to the latter two that you stated.You always have a benchmark to compare too. Take Fallout 4 for example. It's a huge step up from Fallout 3 and has pretty exceptional lighting. So in a vacuum it would've been considered a good looking game. But there are games like TW3 and HZD out there -- and comparing it to them gets it labeled as ugly a lot of the time.
Save your cash and get the xbox. Future proofing yourself!
PD have stuffed up GTS. Or rather its head.I never thought I would get to the point that I want to buy a Xbox and the FIA have stuffed up GTS.
He said CAD models from manufacturers have more detail so no - GT on next PlayStation will have 40 cars because you can use even more polygons or some new tech will render the models obsolete etc etc etc.
Cycle never ends
But I get it - this is what they have - "PD attention to detail" so they HAVE to ride it.
Nah. you get 170 cars and not 700+ for a reason.
Like it or hate it (I hate it because I love variety) they future proofed the quality of there cars they are offering. Quality over quantity. The car models are designed to be utilized for the next gen of consoles.
Huh? Why are you bringing up Forza lol.That reason is outsourcing and the cars in Forza 7 are in 95% as good as those in GTS.
Yeah, and it's the same reason they state at the end of every cycle. "They are future proof, we'll use them for the next X amount of years."Nah. you get 170 cars and not 700+ for a reason.
Because there is literally only one game that is doing 700+. It is extremely obvious what you were getting at.Huh? Why are you bringing up Forza lol.
But they didn't do that. The only thing they have done so far is spent more time on asset creation than they are actually able to utilize (even though they also could have gone back and improve their assets as needed later) in the face of a dramatic quantity shortage and no dramatic quality advantage; and they merely hope (or at least have justified to themselves) that that will give them a jumping off point for the next time they make a game.Like it or hate it (I hate it because I love variety) they future proofed the quality of there cars they are offering.
Ps5 is not coming in 2018 lol.If true I will throw my Playstation out the 🤬 window! I'm not going to waste my 🤬 money on a new 🤬 console every 🤬 few years.
The models look incredible but on PS5 we will probably hear PD say how they decided to build them from scratch to ensure the detail is unmatched.
Hopefully the same old LMP1 cars won't be used.