GT Sport Update 1.22 Discussion Thread

  • Thread starter AKps3
  • 3,154 comments
  • 409,914 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Track's" means it we getting more than 1 tracks??? Maybe a real and fictional track

No. We're getting one track. If we were getting more they would have said "New tracks are" not "A new track's" because that technically reads as "A new track is".

Edit: I was ninja'd by a thousand people. Started typing my response before but I had to put my phone down for a moment.
 
Screen-Shot-2017-11-18-at-12.53.51.png

found this pic of where the lavender blooms are best
 
I know I'm part of the minority that would say this, but I hope that PD adds a rally track or two in the future. It does seem like it's planned since that Colorado Springs track has "Lake" in it's name.
 
Appears we will have our beautiful back road to drive on on now 👍 the only question now is length.

... and whether this reveal process is special simply because it's brand new, or if there's more still that is significant about this locale.
 
I know I'm part of the minority that would say this, but I hope that PD adds a rally track or two in the future. It does seem like it's planned since that Colorado Springs track has "Lake" in it's name.

God I hope not. The terrain is too consistent to ever feel like a true rally course. The traction is the same everywhere on the rally tracks no matter if you're on grass or in the mud. Which is horrible since I love the Group B cars.

I would love some Rally Cross courses though, like Eiger Nordwand from GT6, as the game handles gravel and evenly loose terrain quite well and it would be fun to race on mixed surfaces like that.
 
So, I hear people clamoring on about open-wheel formula cars for some reason. Does anyone have any evidence about this at all?
(although if the FGT were to return, I'm going straight for the Ferrari F2004 livery).

As far as the track goes itself. It looks way too top-speed heavy to be interesting for GT car racing. I'd be surprised if there was any technicality to this layout at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back