It´s a road course; the signs might be there all the time.
I'm curious.It´s a road course; the signs might be there all the time.
I honestly find it hilarious that out of all the things you could rightly complain about in GTS, you chose the to complain about the omission of a single sign on one track.
Honestly, this community.
I guess instead of car pack content like Forza fans, GT fans instead bitch and moan about trackside details in content updates then.
Some signs are missing. I said lol
A picture of the race
Too bad the track is poorly scanned in the game. Several details are missing. PD has not done the homework properly.
Some signs are missing. I said lol
A picture of the race
I just made my comment because these details are avaialable both in Gt5 and Gt6 which were in a previous console. PD has not done a greatr job in GT Sports and you still defend them.
that yellow stripe on the road doesnt have the right shade of yellow it should be giallo modena gelbe jaune 00156721 where can i get refunded
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Not that the Classic Group C cars are in the same class as the modern LMP1 beasts.
First World Problems.
The representation of the track in GTS is miles ahead of GT5/6. The road surface itself was even modeled improperly and was far too bumpy. Track side detail was horrible, trees looked like a PS2 game, and just the environment felt off. The GTS version is the best recreation of of Circuit De La Sarthe in any game/sim that I have seen.Something´s missing in the backgrund.
I just made my comment because these details are avaialable both in Gt5 and Gt6 which were in a previous console. PD has not done a greatr job in GT Sports and you still defend them.
You just said that you wouldn'tSomething´s missing in the backgrund.
I just made my comment because these details are avaialable both in Gt5 and Gt6 which were in a previous console. PD has not done a greatr job in GT Sports and you still defend them.
say a word anymore. Shut case.
Bad example. Those are different places.I don't understand this 'sign' problem. It's like you can't drive on the track because of it?
If the issue would be in ETS2, I would understand the problem, because in that game the signs are essential. For example:
So let's just stop here. That Sarthe is indeed pretty well replicated in GTS, there is even a thread for it on GTP. If that sign would be there, I'm sure no one would notice it.
I wanna assume that the sign is suppose located off track in the background, where it can't really be seen by anyone. If that's the case, why is this being complained about? It's a trackside detail, they've never looked good. And then to say that PD did a bad job because of this and a few missing background details(not you)? What kind of hyper-purist, perfectionist mindset is that?I don't understand this 'sign' problem. It's like you can't drive on the track because of it?
If the issue would be in ETS2, I would understand the problem, because in that game the signs are essential. For example:
So let's just stop here. That Sarthe is indeed pretty well replicated in GTS, there is even a thread for it on GTP. If that sign would be there, I'm sure no one would notice it.
So to convince everyone, you decided that the best way to show the inaccuracies in the modeling of the track was to post a photo of one sign? That was the most inaccurate thing you find, that you decided would be adequate to use in convincing everyone?This page is a joke. it´s taboo to criticize this crap called GT Sports lol
This is only an example. Everything is in the eye of the beholder.
Small minds worry about small thingsI honestly find it hilarious that out of all the things you could rightly complain about in GTS, you chose the to complain about the omission of a single sign on one track.
Honestly, this community.
That isn't a criticism, that's a nitpick, a very minor nitpick. And the fact that you completely trash the track because of a missing sign and some other background details seems a bit over the top. It really feels like you're trying your hardest to look for something wrong on the track so that you can claim that its "poorly scanned". And criticizing GTS isn't taboo on this site. While there may be fanboys who are quick to attack any and all criticism towards the game, if you go through each thread you'll be hardpressed to find anyone actually attacking another for saying something negative about the game. You say that criticism towards GTS is taboo and yet this entire forum is full of people sharing their nitpicks and legitimate with the game. Even in this thread.This page is a joke. it´s taboo to criticize this crap called GT Sports lol
This is only an example. Everything is in the eye of the beholder.
You're certainly not the only oneAnd I got my hopes up over nothing because I saw this was one of the most recently replied threads.
If you mean to talk about the area from the scape you just attached to this post that's not even the same area of the track you're comparing.Something´s missing in the backgrund.
It's not so much the criticism but the attitude of some of the people who post here. GTS is a flawed game, but there's no shortage of instances of people overreacting over relatively minor things, as well as people with limited/no understanding of how certain things in the game are developed.This page is a joke. it´s taboo to criticize this crap called GT Sports lol
Are you new to the internet then!It's not so much the criticism but the attitude of some of the people who post here. GTS is a flawed game, but there's no shortage of instances of people overreacting over relatively minor things, as well as people with limited/no understanding of how certain things in the game are developed.
Nope. This certainly isn't a new occurrence but that doesn't make it any less annoying.Are you new to the internet then!