GT Sport's Next Content Update is On Its Way
- Thread starter GTPNewsWire
- 1,712 comments
- 215,561 views
Silver Arrows
(Banned)
- 4,715
- Brandon, MB
- Silver-Arrows21
- 5,065
- Fort Worth
- That_sneaky_azN
Silver Arrows
(Banned)
- 4,715
- Brandon, MB
- Silver-Arrows21
- 2,295
- Indiana
- pie4july
- 5,300
- Tijuana, B.C.
- MRT_Cinnamon
- 1,400
- Netherlands
There is nothing wrong with seeing such details. But you can put it in other words. Reading your post I would think they forgot one chicane or something 
- 2,227
- Bács-Kiskun
that yellow stripe on the road doesnt have the right shade of yellow it should be giallo modena gelbe jaune 00156721 where can i get refunded
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Not that the Classic Group C cars are in the same class as the modern LMP1 beasts.
First World Problems.
- 194
- Jaguariaíva
Something´s missing in the backgrund.
I just made my comment because these details are avaialable both in Gt5 and Gt6 which were in a previous console. PD has not done a greatr job in GT Sports and you still defend them.
that yellow stripe on the road doesnt have the right shade of yellow it should be giallo modena gelbe jaune 00156721 where can i get refunded
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Not that the Classic Group C cars are in the same class as the modern LMP1 beasts.
First World Problems.
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
- 3,987
- Chicago
- fortbo
- fortbo
The representation of the track in GTS is miles ahead of GT5/6. The road surface itself was even modeled improperly and was far too bumpy. Track side detail was horrible, trees looked like a PS2 game, and just the environment felt off. The GTS version is the best recreation of of Circuit De La Sarthe in any game/sim that I have seen.
- 7,125
- Massachusetts
- llClaude_Speedll
- BlazingSol05
And I got my hopes up over nothing because I saw this was one of the most recently replied threads. 
- 5,065
- Fort Worth
- That_sneaky_azN
- 2,227
- Bács-Kiskun
I don't understand this 'sign' problem. It's like you can't drive on the track because of it?
If the issue would be in ETS2, I would understand the problem, because in that game the signs are essential. For example:
So let's just stop here. That Sarthe is indeed pretty well replicated in GTS, there is even a thread for it on GTP. If that sign would be there, I'm sure no one would notice it.
If the issue would be in ETS2, I would understand the problem, because in that game the signs are essential. For example:
So let's just stop here. That Sarthe is indeed pretty well replicated in GTS, there is even a thread for it on GTP. If that sign would be there, I'm sure no one would notice it.
- 534
- Poland
Bad example.I don't understand this 'sign' problem. It's like you can't drive on the track because of it?
If the issue would be in ETS2, I would understand the problem, because in that game the signs are essential. For example:
So let's just stop here. That Sarthe is indeed pretty well replicated in GTS, there is even a thread for it on GTP. If that sign would be there, I'm sure no one would notice it.
Those are different places. 
- 748
- Canada
- hypershock12
I wanna assume that the sign is suppose located off track in the background, where it can't really be seen by anyone. If that's the case, why is this being complained about? It's a trackside detail, they've never looked good. And then to say that PD did a bad job because of this and a few missing background details(not you)? What kind of hyper-purist, perfectionist mindset is that?I don't understand this 'sign' problem. It's like you can't drive on the track because of it?
If the issue would be in ETS2, I would understand the problem, because in that game the signs are essential. For example:
So let's just stop here. That Sarthe is indeed pretty well replicated in GTS, there is even a thread for it on GTP. If that sign would be there, I'm sure no one would notice it.
- 14,430
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
- 113
- Arizona
Small minds worry about small things
- 748
- Canada
- hypershock12
That isn't a criticism, that's a nitpick, a very minor nitpick. And the fact that you completely trash the track because of a missing sign and some other background details seems a bit over the top. It really feels like you're trying your hardest to look for something wrong on the track so that you can claim that its "poorly scanned". And criticizing GTS isn't taboo on this site. While there may be fanboys who are quick to attack any and all criticism towards the game, if you go through each thread you'll be hardpressed to find anyone actually attacking another for saying something negative about the game. You say that criticism towards GTS is taboo and yet this entire forum is full of people sharing their nitpicks and legitimate with the game. Even in this thread.
- 5,645
- North Dakota
- RacingCowboy570
- RacingCowboy570
You're certainly not the only oneAnd I got my hopes up over nothing because I saw this was one of the most recently replied threads.
- 11,334
- The 51st state of america
- sparkytooth50001
Sage Ages
(Banned)
- 12,817
- Antarctica
It's not so much the criticism but the attitude of some of the people who post here. GTS is a flawed game, but there's no shortage of instances of people overreacting over relatively minor things, as well as people with limited/no understanding of how certain things in the game are developed.
- 5,645
- North Dakota
- RacingCowboy570
- RacingCowboy570
I'm finding it hard to understand why you would complain about such a minute issue in a thread that's announcing an update that happened over a month ago. If I were you I'd go to the "GT Sport Epic Whining and Crying" thread instead.
- 1,167
- Paradera
- SDSPOWER01
Ya'll here must be joking I can't believe ya'll would think that La sarthe is the best recreation ever I mean the grass clearly is not green in real life:
Compared to GT Sport:
This is 8000000 % proof of a poorly scanned track!
I mean no harm, but I just had to; the way the thread was turning out to be...
Compared to GT Sport:
This is 8000000 % proof of a poorly scanned track!
I mean no harm, but I just had to; the way the thread was turning out to be...
Similar threads
