GT4 Master Car List
- Thread starter The359
- 3,483 comments
- 456,002 views
- 30,025
- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
The only info on the site I could find regarding it's appearence on X-Box is this little bit here in the news section.
2003-09-04
Koenigsegg and X-box
The Koenigsegg CC is the star of the latest edition of Midtown Madness.
The latest edition of the X-box features the Koenigsegg CC as the ultimate supercar. In order to drive the Koenigsegg CC you need to pass all other levels, i.e. all the other slower cars.
I couldn't find anything that hinted at an exclusive licence.
2003-09-04
Koenigsegg and X-box
The Koenigsegg CC is the star of the latest edition of Midtown Madness.
The latest edition of the X-box features the Koenigsegg CC as the ultimate supercar. In order to drive the Koenigsegg CC you need to pass all other levels, i.e. all the other slower cars.
I couldn't find anything that hinted at an exclusive licence.
- 19,311
- Inland Empire SoCal
- SOLID_LIFTERS
If any of you can remember where I can see the pic of the ASL Garaiya GT 300 JGTC Race Car, please let me know. I can't find it. Thanks bunch.
Don't tell the owner of a *real* Mini that they drive a BMW for God's sake; you'll start WW3.
The car that BMW have the cheek to call a Mini is no more a Mini than is an 8-seater MPV. Just like every Golf since the Mk3, it's a bloated, overweight, obscenity which draws on the image of the original article to artificially bloat the sales of an otherwise innoffensive but ultimately uninspiring car. Yes, I've been in one. One word: yawn
And just about the only reason why British journalists like it is because it's made by BMW. If the exact same car was made by MG-R they'd slag it off bigstyle.
The car that BMW have the cheek to call a Mini is no more a Mini than is an 8-seater MPV. Just like every Golf since the Mk3, it's a bloated, overweight, obscenity which draws on the image of the original article to artificially bloat the sales of an otherwise innoffensive but ultimately uninspiring car. Yes, I've been in one. One word: yawn
And just about the only reason why British journalists like it is because it's made by BMW. If the exact same car was made by MG-R they'd slag it off bigstyle.
- 2,018
I still think a Mini should be well, mini. The new Mini is bigger than most small hatches, which even if statistically its better, thats besides the point, its a bigger car! 
Bit like the New Beetle which I believe is basically a VW Golf, its also bigger than the original & pretty expensive. So doesn't really hold many similarities to the original, just its a similar shape.
I would be more impressed if they made a new Mini similar to the size of the original one but made it relatively safe & comfortable, of course that would be difficult being such a small car. But c'mon its a Mini not a Maxi
Trend of cars these days - make small cars bigger, then introduce new 'small' cars
Bit like the New Beetle which I believe is basically a VW Golf, its also bigger than the original & pretty expensive. So doesn't really hold many similarities to the original, just its a similar shape.I would be more impressed if they made a new Mini similar to the size of the original one but made it relatively safe & comfortable, of course that would be difficult being such a small car. But c'mon its a Mini not a Maxi
Trend of cars these days - make small cars bigger, then introduce new 'small' cars
- 30,025
- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
It's great car, but it's far too expensive for what you get, a few grand more and a second hand good as new S2000 is yours. Mini or S2000, I know it would depend on what you needed the car for, an S2000 would be hell trying to load a week or two's shopping in, but if you neede it to cope with a degree of load lugging, would you get a new Mini anyway, you can get a Focus 1.8 for less.
Apologies, the359, you're quite right. I feel I hijacked the thread there a bit. Also sorry to anyone I may have offended who owns a new "Mini" and likes it. Most people who have never driven my model of car tell me my car is crap, so who am I to slag off someone else's car just 'cos I don't like it? Each to his own 
Hi M5_dude, I drive the MG Maestro Turbo which was photographed for inclusion in GT4 last year. It's now appearing in a number of 'net GT4 lists, so on the assumption that "there's no smoke without fire", I'm hoping that it will indeed be featured. See my earlier postings in (I think) page 8 of this thread for a pic of my car (I guess you Stateside folks won't have seen an MG Maestro Turbo before).
EDIT: Correction: the pic is on page 6 - just checked!
Race Idiot
(Banned)
- 11,439
- Sao Tome and Principe
I'm just wondering, wouldn't it be a good idea if this thread was stickyed and then put in place of the other GT4 car list.
*cough* mods *cough*
*cough* mods *cough*
- 87,807
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Apply that logic to the site as a whole.
People are supposed to read the AUP and ToS before signing up - rarely happens. People are supposed to read the "Read This: Look Here Before You Ask" thread in the GT3 forum before they ask anything - almost never happens. And there used to be a stickied "The Answer to The Question: What Is The Best Car" thread - where the first line of the first post said "There isn't one" - but people constantly were posting what they thought was the best car in that thread.
A large percentage of the populous this site is permanently stupid - as opposed to the rest of us who are occasionally or often stupid. I can see why "Der Management" didn't want to sticky this thread - and have you SEEN some of the dross in it cluttering it up?
People are supposed to read the AUP and ToS before signing up - rarely happens. People are supposed to read the "Read This: Look Here Before You Ask" thread in the GT3 forum before they ask anything - almost never happens. And there used to be a stickied "The Answer to The Question: What Is The Best Car" thread - where the first line of the first post said "There isn't one" - but people constantly were posting what they thought was the best car in that thread.
A large percentage of the populous this site is permanently stupid - as opposed to the rest of us who are occasionally or often stupid. I can see why "Der Management" didn't want to sticky this thread - and have you SEEN some of the dross in it cluttering it up?
Correct, which means you either know me, know the previous owner, or (more likely) you've learned how to use the RAC Vehicle Checking Service which tells you when the car last changed owners. Interestingly, the aforementioned website also tells me that G51 NAV was built 11 months after I know it was first registered, so it's bit useless really!
- 87,807
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Curse you! You could have at least pretended to be spooked!
The site also tells me my girlfriend's car was built three days after she took delivery of it - seeing as she got it in January '04, in ought to have an 04 plate if they are right, but it has a 53 plate.
They got the date of transfer of my last car right though. I must check the written-off one...
Edit: Hmm. My written-off car last changed owners 4 months after it was written-off. Well, at least I was right - it would make a decent, easy repair job for someone.
Curiously, my first car, sold SIX years ago, only left the people who bought it from me in November just gone... Fascinating.
Anyway, back to the topic. What was it again?
The site also tells me my girlfriend's car was built three days after she took delivery of it - seeing as she got it in January '04, in ought to have an 04 plate if they are right, but it has a 53 plate.
They got the date of transfer of my last car right though. I must check the written-off one...
Edit: Hmm. My written-off car last changed owners 4 months after it was written-off. Well, at least I was right - it would make a decent, easy repair job for someone.
Curiously, my first car, sold SIX years ago, only left the people who bought it from me in November just gone... Fascinating.
Anyway, back to the topic. What was it again?
