GT5 First Review 100/100

All of what they mentioned is info that is already out there and has been re worded to look like a real review (which they failed at miserably). Does anybody actually think that this random, pretty much unknown site is going to have the first official review of GT5...
 
All of what they mentioned is info that is already out there and has been re worded to look like a real review (which they failed at miserably). Does anybody actually think that this random, pretty much unknown site is going to have the first official review of GT5...

Yeah. Also that rating. 100/100? C'mon.
I really love the GT series. But 100%? Never!
 
I've mailed message to John Doe's ( PR agency they claim to get material from) to see if they've had review copies to pass on to try and clear this up.
 
Last edited:
Trust on what Amar says people... If his sources say there are no review codes out in the wild than you can be certain that that is the case. 👍
 
If anyone needs another reason why this review is fake the the next issue of the Official Playstation UK magazine is out on 24th November and will have a review of GT5 pending any more changes so I would assume the review embargo would be in place until then.
 
I have just consulted with some sources and they're very sceptical about very existance of any review-code at this point.

I can't share any information at this point, but my source is 99% certain that review-codes are not available anywhere.

All I will say is that this post contains truth and that the website does not. ;)
 
I had a reply direct from John Doe PR whom the website lists as their source of review material..

No review copies of Gran Turismo 5 have been sent out to anyone, so as far as I can see this review could only be based on previous information that was released.
 
Good luck Gt5 against EDGE and Gametrailer. This game critics from this sites are the hardest to please and most credible and accurate and unbias
 
Good luck Gt5 against EDGE and Gametrailer. This game critics from this sites are the hardest to please and most credible and accurate and unbias

What?the Forza3 gametrailers review reeked of fanboyism,they didnt mention a single flaw,that includes it lacking gear shifts etc.They didnt mention the online pitfalls either.The Gametrailers review of GTPrologue was pathetic.It was way to harsh.as for Edge....lol.nah.their not credible
 
The "reviewer" is probably refreshing this thread right now, laughing.

C'mon people, don't believe this garbage. 👎
 
What?the Forza3 gametrailers review reeked of fanboyism,they didnt mention a single flaw,that includes it lacking gear shifts etc.They didnt mention the online pitfalls either.The Gametrailers review of GTPrologue was pathetic.It was way to harsh.as for Edge....lol.nah.their not credible

The official playstation magazine is very unbiased...
 
Very skeptical at the moment, only mentions four themes to choose from for the Course Maker, we've seen at least 9 themes. Since there is photo mode, why didn't he take new shots.
Everything mention could have been drawn from all the information out there. Is there any evidence of a full build of this game exists?.
 
I'm glad to read that there was no lag experienced in the online game, you know, since NO ONE else has a copy.
 
If anyone needs another reason why this review is fake the the next issue of the Official Playstation UK magazine is out on 24th November and will have a review of GT5 pending any more changes so I would assume the review embargo would be in place until then.

That's when the magazine releases, doesn't mean the embargo is until then. Besides some subscribers got this months issue that was meant to have a review 4 days early!

So we can count on some early reviews.
 
I'm not sure why we're still debating this. It's clearly someone just writing based on what we know so far, if they REALLY had access to a copy of GT5 then they'd be very wise to actually tell us new information, take some screenshots, I don't care if you conveniently don't have capture equipment, just get your phone and snap some previously unknown information.. new tracks, features, and so on. It's so obviously not a real review, and pieced together from all the stuff we already know anyway, if anyone after this post debates it any further then I lose some credibiity for the sanity of some people on GTP. Don't be fooled. We'll know a real review when we see it.. Move along.
 
I'm not sure why we're still debating this. It's clearly someone just writing based on what we know so far, if they REALLY had access to a copy of GT5 then they'd be very wise to actually tell us new information, take some screenshots, I don't care if you conveniently don't have capture equipment, just get your phone and snap some previously unknown information.. new tracks, features, and so on. It's so obviously not a real review, and pieced together from all the stuff we already know anyway, if anyone after this post debates it any further then I lose some credibiity for the sanity of some people on GTP. Don't be fooled. We'll know a real review when we see it.. Move along.

+1 👍

off-topic: I LOVE Kopparberg.. :P My friend always brings it back for me from the UK when he comes over... Can't get it here in Holland :(
 
I don't think this is legit, all the photos are from press conferences and such. I noticed a few photos repeated and some spelling mistakes, '...Le mann 24hrs...'.

On a lighter note, his similies are somewhat strange, '...copilot will bop up and down like a Church Hill Dog'. :lol:
 
Last edited:
If this was truly the first review of a full build of this game (which would be a big deal), then it would be up on the news page, at this moment there is some question of this article's authenticity, & Jordan might be trying to verify it.
 
If this was truly the first review of a full build of this game (which would be a big deal), then it would be up on the news page, at this moment there is some question of this article's authenticity, & Jordan might be trying to verify it.

That is being very generous.

Look, I'm all for "waiting to see" and stuff like that, but c'mon this is one is very obvious.
 
It IS fake. I have emailed the site and asked why actualy. I mean.. don't they want people to take the site seriously? Cause now they have messed up real bad I tihkn...

If they/he reply, I can tell you guys what they said....
 
Back