Did you think that GT5 would have infinite resolution or something? I'm surprised that you're so surprised.Hey, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying they look bad or even that they are low resolution textures. Note I said "lower than". Even though it's lower than the ones in photomode it's still pretty high and will look fairly good in 1080p.
Still, it's kind of a sad that extreme close ups, like the ones shown in the video posted by Sasuki, won't look so sexy in texture based cars.
Wow, just wow. So life-like!, i really didn't think PD would model such minute details such as the welds, truly amazing.
I found it surprising that the Nascars had beer ads on them. I thought that was a no-no for E rated games. I thought that's why Nascar Racing 4 replaced all alcohol advertising on all their cars. Interesting.
^what a surprise... /sarcasm.
I would guess that's one reason why GT5 is still Rating Pending.
Did you think that GT5 would have infinite resolution or something? I'm surprised that you're so surprised.
GT5 is amazing, but you can't have resolution so small in a videogame that you can see individual specs of dust in the ground.
Gran Turismo 5... Rated A by the ESRB.
I don't recall being surprised, in fact it's something I've been suspecting since prologue thanks to the Blitz car.
And I don't know what's up with the defensive attitude around here. I'm not even saying the textures are bad not even implied as far as I can tell, and people are jumping at me
Not to mention the fact that you clearly stated you were being sarcastic. I think people need to lighten up a bit.
That would be paskowitz
I think it has more to do with the angle that they are of different resolution textures, for example without zooms or anything:
Race:
http://i32.tinypic.com/ofu25f.jpg
Garage:
http://i29.tinypic.com/2iqfkab.jpg
I think it has more to do with the angle that they are of different resolution textures, for example without zooms or anything:
Race:
http://i32.tinypic.com/ofu25f.jpg[IMG]
Garage:
[IMG]http://i29.tinypic.com/2iqfkab.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
The difference is subtle but it's there. Look at the "comp cams" sticker.
[quote="Sasuki, post: 3929430"]@SSJNeBiRoS
[B]Nice find, like i said, they have the same resolution.[/B][/QUOTE]
Hum... nope.
👍👍 Quite well done. Perhaps it should go into the 'Fan-Made' Videos Thread.
👍
http://i31.tinypic.com/jkygi1.jpg[IMG]
[B]it's great that extreme close ups, like the ones shown in the video posted by Sasuki, will look so sexy in texture based cars.[/B]
and yes its sexy! :P
...[/QUOTE]
They are both garage shots?
hum.... yes.
it seems your not that much happy for seeing the pics posted by SSJNeBiRoS
Hmmmmm and i wonder.
@Dravonic
Flame bait? im having discussion, if someone disagree with you will automatically call it Flame bait? lol why so sensible?
anyways i edited my last post with the right pic.
whats wrong with you people?
Flame baits all over the place.
Look at the pictures, thankfully the difference is small, I never said otherwise, but it's there.
Exactly what I'm wondering. From now on I'll make sure I only point out positive things...
Honestly D those pics are amazing and from those pics bro all you can write about is how the stickers don't look good? Im not saying you have to be on PD stuff and always say positive things, but seems to me you only care about the negatives man.
Why are people pointing out the jpeg compression artifacts?!
Flame baits all over the place.
Flame baits all over the place.
Look at the pictures, thankfully the difference is small, I never said otherwise, but it's there.
Exactly what I'm wondering. From now on I'll make sure I only point out positive things...