- 388
- Antwerp, Belgium
Disturbed07A good car is a good car, well, the same goes for tracks, and it's less likely to see prejudice against tracks... After all, it's asphalt or concrete... that's it. I'll mostly only be able to name American tracks, because those are in my giant, far away from the others, country. But what I really want is an equal share with tracks, along with cars. Everything good from everywhere. No exceptions, at the least, an equal balance, Japanese-based (company) or not, they have the money, and I'll pay a little more for it, be it 10-15$ more than a standard game.P.S. Nordshleife was a Fantastic addition to GT, day/night changes would be great, and all the versions would be great, but even as it is, is was a great addition for the game.
Now what if there's a LOT less American tracks in GT5 than other tracks (like it's always been), but we still end up with about 50 new great tracks. Will you really complain about the balance?
I like to think all this "I want an equal balance" is irrelevant. It would be more of a limiting factor to PD than anything else. I imagine they would find about 10 American tracks they want to put in the next GT, and a hell of a lot more Japanese and European (or Australian even) ones. Should they say "Ah damn we already did 10 new European and 10 new Japanese tracks, we shall have to leave out all these other great tracks we had in mind" ?
The answer is of course no. Don't worry, they know there are worthwile tracks in America, they'll put some of them in the game. But they'll look for good tracks, no matter where they come from, and that's more of quality-guarantee than looking for location-specific tracks. Japanese tracks will still have the upper hand, as they would know of a lot more good Japanese tracks than say American tracks. But that doesn't matter, you'll still have good tracks. Good tracks you never heard of, and it's never too late to learn new stuff.