GT6 Indy Drag Car Classes

Status
Not open for further replies.
How have we been proven wrong?
Rab's vid contained 5 minutes of edited runs with 3 Venti's and 2 TVR's.
3 people from the same country getting far more equal trees than you guys ever have a chance of getting.
Consistency showed they are damn good run.

Your vid shows a TVR tune that was utter junk and a bunch of shocking trees.

Shells just got his back up about my post at the top of this page.
All good dude, you do what you gotta do.

Like I said the other video was longer and had more runs (all even trees) but @jdiaz092009's phone deleted it, I will gladly get you another video if you'd like but I think first you should learn how to read. Another video is in the works now.
 
Like I said the other video was longer and had more runs (all even trees) but @jdiaz092009's phone deleted it, I will gladly get you another video if you'd like but I think first you should learn how to read. Another video is in the works now.
How's about you make a vid where your racing some better quality tuners.
Ask Nick and the boys at TDS to help out, Or X3sgteX.
Someone that brings their cars prepared to race "properly". 👍
 
Last edited:
How's about you make a vid where your racing some better quality tuners.
Ask Nick and the boys at TDS to help out, Or X3stge.
Someone that brings their cars prepared to race "properly". 👍
And how can you be sure your Aventador has the best tune as well?
 
Im not saying he is slow. I'm saying that TVR tune was junk.
No one has every car tuned to the limit, clearly this is one of them.
Everyone else were in venti's, what else am I to think.

Like I stated, why not try running another quality US tuner, off a US ghost.
 
Im not saying he is slow. I'm saying that TVR tune was junk.
No one has every car tuned to the limit, clearly this is one of them.
Everyone else were in venti's, what else am I to think.

Like I stated, why not try running another quality US tuner, off a US ghost.

LOL, what exactly is the issue with what we did in our video? I got hundreds of even trees today with @B Minimal, @a3picGamer47, @levitt1991, and @wraith of horus on a Euro ghost. Ask anyone of them and they will all tell you that it was 2 cars behind the Aventador.
 
LOL, what exactly is the issue with what we did in our video? I got hundreds of even trees today with @B Minimal, @a3picGamer47, @levitt1991, and @wraith of horus on a Euro ghost. Ask anyone of them and they will all tell you that it was 2 cars behind the Aventador.

I'm not going to continue this.....It's a waste of my time.

Go ask JD ( the person whom took the vid ) his true opinion.
I already know what he's got to say on th matter.

Happy tuning gentlemen.
 
Well I just timed it, here are the results:

Aventador LP 700-4 '11:
0-400M - 8.290
0-60MPH - 1.410
0-100MPH - 3.150

Cerbera Speed 12 '00:
0-400M - 8.310
0-60MPH - 1.940
0-100MPH - 3.410

My timing system is surprisingly accurate as I have tested my times with dozens of people online and 90% of the time the result is that which I predicted. In this case the Aventador was quicker by .020 which is roughly 3/4 of a car. But remember this is at SSRX so the advantage goes to the TVR which is pulling hard on the lambo at the end but still loses. At Indy I would say the Aventador takes it by 1-2 cars.
 
Well I just timed it, here are the results:

Aventador LP 700-4 '11:
0-400M - 8.290
0-60MPH - 1.410
0-100MPH - 3.150

Cerbera Speed 12 '00:
0-400M - 8.310
0-60MPH - 1.940
0-100MPH - 3.410

My timing system is surprisingly accurate as I have tested my times with dozens of people online and 90% of the time the result is that which I predicted. In this case the Aventador was quicker by .020 which is roughly 3/4 of a car. But remember this is at SSRX so the advantage goes to the TVR which is pulling hard on the lambo at the end but still loses. At Indy I would say the Aventador takes it by 1-2 cars.

Thank you @Harry6784, you are actually 100% correct the Aventador does in fact take the Speed 12 by 1-2 cars. If you'd like to test it on Indy I'm in a lobby right now and you're more than welcome to join.
 
Thank you @Harry6784, you are actually 100% correct the Aventador does in fact take the Speed 12 by 1-2 cars. If you'd like to test it on Indy I'm in a lobby right now and you're more than welcome to join.
Which pretty much confirms what I thought, never had any Speed-12 beat my Aventador before. It always was 1-2 cars ahead
 
Well I just timed it, here are the results:

Aventador LP 700-4 '11:
0-400M - 8.290
0-60MPH - 1.410
0-100MPH - 3.150

Cerbera Speed 12 '00:
0-400M - 8.310
0-60MPH - 1.940
0-100MPH - 3.410

My timing system is surprisingly accurate as I have tested my times with dozens of people online and 90% of the time the result is that which I predicted. In this case the Aventador was quicker by .020 which is roughly 3/4 of a car. But remember this is at SSRX so the advantage goes to the TVR which is pulling hard on the lambo at the end but still loses. At Indy I would say the Aventador takes it by 1-2 cars.

Your system is fine, assuming your tunes up to scratch.
DSC_00471_zps26585f57.jpg

0-60
DSC_00481_zpsc920151a.jpg

0-101

I'm not even going to bother with the over all ET.

Anything else anyone would like to add?
Any more takers/ disbelievers?
 
1) Your times will not be relevant with mine since you likely lined up in a different place than I did. I line up right before the timer engages, past the "line". If you launched slightly before the line you will get a "running start" boosting your times by up to .100

2) I may not be accurate down to the thousandth of a second but I am close enough to make my times usable for comparison, and often is the case where the results I predicted in my timing test is replicated online.

3) Video is uploading showing what I initially predicted, Venti > Speed 12 by 1-2 cars....

4) And all my times are "BSL" launches.
 
Last edited:
1) Your times will not be relevant with mine since you likely lined up in a different place than I did. I line up right before the timer engages, past the "line". If you launched slightly before the line you will get a "running start" boosting your times by up to .100

2) I may not be accurate down to the thousandth of a second but I am close enough to make my times usable for comparison, and often is the case where the results I predicted in my timing test is replicated online.

3) Video is uploading showing what I initially predicted, Venti > Speed 12 by 1-2 cars....
Always wondered, how do you line up so it's perfectly with the point the timer starta
 
Always wondered, how do you line up so it's perfectly with the point the timer starta

Lots of practice? :lol:

I timed over 100 cars at this point and for each one can spend up to 2 min just lining it up perfectly so the times are as accurate as possible.
 
Your system is fine, assuming your tunes up to scratch.
DSC_00471_zps26585f57.jpg

0-60
DSC_00481_zpsc920151a.jpg

0-101

I'm not even going to bother with the over all ET.

Anything else anyone would like to add?
Any more takers/ disbelievers?

My apologies, ran the above pass with my NA tune. ( yes i have a turbo, S/C & a N/A tune )
See below for revised numbers.
& lol at me quoting myself

DSC_00601_zps00ef156e.jpg

DSC_00611_zps446f98df.jpg

DSC_00661_zpsea1eb86a.jpg


Speed 12 is good for around a 8.1.
And of course, this is a BSL.
Obviously, I'm pausing the replay as we go to get these numbers, so there will be some slight variances.

DSC_00691_zps1a731236.jpg

DSC_00701_zps71a14c06.jpg

DSC_00711_zps2714fe80.jpg

DSC_00721_zps7092a9c0.jpg


Don't look much like 2 car lengths to me.

I've put up my numbers, and I'm certainly not the kind of person to go jigging things to suit my needs.

Y'all can put the TVR down as 2 car lengths slower... just pray I never show up in your lobbies and prove just how terribly wrong you are.
 
Last edited:
Because its tuned for SSRX as is my Aventador.

All of us are in a lobby right now if you want to show us noobs your speed 12 👍
 
lol @ 5.06

And why is this TVR still launching in 2nd and not making full use of the powerband when crossing the shadow?
Thought you blokes were pro's.

Always nitpicking, yours is running a 6 speed transmission as well. For your information your pictures are proving that you're basing it on Route X, you are aware that Indy is shorter than Route X thus just because it may be faster on Route X wont mean that it will be on Indy hence why this thread is called "GT6 Indy Drag Car Classes." On Indy it will be 1-2 cars behind the Aventador which was my initial results.
 
Because its tuned for SSRX as is my Aventador.

Right, so your using your SSRX tuned Speed 12 vs Shells Indy tuned Venti.

You don't see a problem with this?

Go look at your run @ 5.06 and tell me they aren't close.
 
Right, so your using your SSRX tuned Speed 12 vs Shells Indy tuned Venti.

You don't see a problem with this?

Go look at your run @ 5.06 and tell me they aren't close.

Read the text right after that race and watch that race again, he treed me by a bumper, pay attention and a car length behind is still out of the Aventador's class.
 
Man that video was pretty good with those runs. Harry doesn't like to brake before hitting the wall I see, rather let the wall stop him!:lol: That person with the corvette was a horrible ghost, I hate it when people ghost fast, they need to give people a chance to make sure they are ready. I got kicked from a room 2 nights ago because I told the person to stop ghosting so fast.
 
Read the text right after that race and watch that race again, he treed me by a bumper, pay attention and a car length behind is still out of the Aventador's class.

I paid attention....
Yes he did tree you marginally, and with a better tune, you'd most likely have been seeing his tail lights.
 
Man that video was pretty good with those runs. Harry doesn't like to brake before hitting the wall I see, rather let the wall stop him!:lol: That person with the corvette was a horrible ghost, I hate it when people ghost fast, they need to give people a chance to make sure they are ready. I got kicked from a room 2 nights ago because I told the person to stop ghosting so fast.
Ghosting too fast is not as bad as ghosting too slow, focusing on a bright screen for more than half a minute hurts my eyes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back