GT6 Screenshots / Videos

  • Thread starter BkS
  • 10,029 comments
  • 1,393,400 views
¿Marussia B2?

Marusia.png
 
Its obviously a 2013 porsche.

The purpose was to show the car, not the location...
They wanted to save the reveal of the location for a later time...
If they "leak" out photos from PhotoMode... How crazy this forum would become...
So for now, you will have to do away with the gray one tone background.
"De rien "
I think the purpose is to show the car in natural lighting, instead of showroom lighting. I prefer these renders over the gt5 ones.

@sparkytooth
Well the porsche and LFA look nearly identical.So you can understand the confusion.
 
Last edited:
I thought that was the Gran Turismo Corvette from SEMA.

If it was then how and why did they get rid of that rear scope. In other words the SEMA one had the rear scope below/next to the C pillar just like the other C7 Vette's. So it is something else I'd say. Unless the scope is further up and the angle doesn't show it all, but it sits right there so not sure why the vent would be missing.

marussia_b2_04.jpg


B2 doesn't have a vent at all and I always thought of it as a Russian Vette.

However, reality set in and it was clearly an AMC Pacer, so I think we're all winners knowing we can blow up with a single tap to the rear!!!:dopey:
 
Last edited:
If it was then how and why did they get rid of that rear scope. In other words the SEMA one had the rear scope below/next to the C pillar just like the other C7 Vette's. So it is something else I'd say. Unless the scope is further up and the angle doesn't show it all, but it sits right there so not sure why the vent would be missing.

Because it was a resin model?

They didn't get rid of the rear scope, they just didn't have them sculpted in from that shot.

Besides, that shape isn't even close to the Marussia B2 as it doesn't share the roundness of the curves (and it actually has mirrors unlike the B2).
 
Because it was a resin model?

Makes sense.

They didn't get rid of the rear scope, they just didn't have them sculpted in from that shot.

Just said they didn't the first part was sarcasm that obviously was carried over and fixed with the second statement.
Besides, that shape isn't even close to the Marussia B2 as it doesn't share the roundness of the curves (and it actually has mirrors unlike the B2).

They do have similar C pillar shapes, I'm not saying it is the B2, I'm just saying I can see how the OP might have confused and got optimistic with it. Just wondered why the vent was missing if it was the Vette and now I know.
 
^^^ For those who making slo-mo videos I really suggest to take a 60fps videos as source, because it will be much easer for program to interpolate those new frames from higher frame-rate videos (quality will be MUCH better). I hope it will help.
 
^^^ For those who making slo-mo videos I really suggest to take a 60fps videos as source, because it will be much easer for program to interpolate those new frames from higher frame-rate videos (quality will be MUCH better). I hope it will help.

Where can people find those 60 fps videos?

They weren't presented on any gameshow so nobody but PD has them, and as far as I know, they only upload them to Youtube
 
For car fans, there are some here who are not very good at recognising obvious design cues. That was obviously the SEMA Corvette. Look at the Marussia, there are no straight lines at the back there, yet one massive one in the front of the frame for the clay model.
 
For car fans, there are some here who are not very good at recognising obvious design cues. That was obviously the SEMA Corvette. Look at the Marussia, there are no straight lines at the back there, yet one massive one in the front of the frame for the clay model.
No it wasn't the SEMA Corvette.

It was the pre-production clay model C7.
 

Latest Posts

Back