It does at 30hz, ps4 might get an update this fall to support 4k streaming and be able to play 4k at 60hz with HDMI 2.0No. PS4 doesn't support 4K. There's absolutely no reason for PD to waste time showing off anything in that resolution.
The console doesn't even support 4K TVs so I don't know how you're posting that saying it's got support at 30hz, which btw, is still completely useless for gaming.It does at 30hz, ps4 might get an update this fall to support 4k streaming and be able to play 4k at 60hz with HDMI 2.0
Wait and see..hahaThe console doesn't even support 4K TVs so I don't know how you're posting that saying it's got support at 30hz, which btw, is still completely useless for gaming.
Wait and see..haha
SourceWhile your wallet is open for the 4K monitor, you’ll need to keep it open for a high-end graphics card as well. Even the AMD Radeon 295X2, a dual-GPU, water-cooled behemoth, managed only 22 FPS when tasked with running Crysis 3 with graphical settings set to very high. Battlefield 4 didn’t fare much better, scoring a playable, but still slow 37 FPS.
Aside from raw compute power, which is needed to crank out 8.3 million pixels in a 4K image, you also need a lot of video RAM. Our review of the Radeon 295X2 compared it to two Nvidia 780 GTX Ti graphics cards running in SLI. While the 780 Tis performed well in most games, they ran out of steam in Crysis 3, where they put out an average of just 3 FPS. They scored so poorly because they ran out of video RAM, which meant that there wasn’t enough bandwidth available to reliably send the images generated by the GPUs to the monitor.
Well, nobody thought that Ps3 had enough power for 1080p, and look how that turned out for PD.The PS4 doesn't have enough GPU power to do 4K unless you want all standard cars and tracks, no weather, and only 4 AI. It takes a high end PC to do 4k gaming to begin with and the PS4 just isn't in that league
The videocards mentioned below are many times more powerful than the PS4.
Source
There were 1080p 60fps games before on the PS3.Well, nobody thought that Ps3 had enough power for 1080p, and look how that turned out for PD.
Don't know about 1080p maybe 720p 60 fps, but the only game I have as of now that's 1080p constantly 60 is Wipeout HD/Fury.There were 1080p 60fps games before on the PS3.
Don't know about 1080p maybe 720p 60 fps, but the only game I have as of now that's 1080p constantly 60 is Wipeout HD/Fury.
Ridge Racer for the PS3 is 1080p 60fps locked , came really early in the PS3's lifespan.
Yeah, and it looked like an early Ps2 game.Ridge Racer for the PS3 is 1080p 60fps locked , came really early in the PS3's lifespan.
Yeah, and it looked like an early Ps2 game.
Even PS2 had HD graphics. GT4 supported 1080iWell, nobody thought that Ps3 had enough power for 1080p, and look how that turned out for PD.
Even PS2 had HD graphics. GT4 supported 1080i
Think it will only make sense for them to do 4K Ultra HD replays and allow photomode use with that resolution.
Yes but view on screen at that resolution while using the feature.you can take photos at 3840 x 2160 (4K) resolution in GT6.
Neither gt5 or gt6 actually run in 1920x1080. The graphics are rendered at 1280x1080 and 1440x1080 respectively, which isn't true full hd, even if it is pretty close. Neither of the games run at a stable 60 fps either. I don't think high res is anything to brag about if the framerate isn't good as well. If you just lower the framerate enough, anything can do "full hd".Well, nobody thought that Ps3 had enough power for 1080p, and look how that turned out for PD.
Considering how the majority of games on ps3 run at 720p or less and 30fps or less, GT is still an impressive achievement.Neither gt5 or gt6 actually run in 1920x1080. The graphics are rendered at 1280x1080 and 1440x1080 respectively, which isn't true full hd, even if it is pretty close. Neither of the games run at a stable 60 fps either. I don't think high res is anything to brag about if the framerate isn't good as well. If you just lower the framerate enough, anything can do "full hd".
When you've got proper 4k content and an 80 inch TV, which will not at all be unusual in a few years, it will be a huge difference. 1080p struggles to look detailed or crisp past 50 inch especially if you have any sort of text or graphics (like a game HUD) or edges on screen that are thin/diagonal/circular.I don't even understand the hype behind 4K. Is there really that big a difference?
Well, consider this - going from 720p to 1080p is having 2.25 times more pixels on the screen, going from 1080p to 4k is having 4 times more pixels. 4 times the detail, but also 4 times the performance needed to render in case of rendering games.I don't even understand the hype behind 4K. Is there really that big a difference?