- 1,125
Oh, don't forget about customizing your own cars and buying cars from dealerships. Also, San Andreas WILL be set in the 2000s. Oh, **** yeah!
Some nice ideas there! 👍Originally posted by Moester
I have a few suggestions on the next grand theft auto:
there should be a chop shop that has an area were nos can be put into the car.
The main character should carry around a lock pick set so he can unlock cars.
Drive-bys should can be done with other weapons.
More missions.
A place that weapons are stashed when you get wasted or busted.
There should be one of each type of weapon gained while the hidden packages are being found.
The weapons from the hidden packages should be at each property.
At a chop shop you can make a car standard.
You get stuff like in grand theft auto vice city when you get a 100% and extra missions.
If you go through a red light or are speeding and theres a cop around or hit a cop car , the cop should chase you and give you a ticket.
The cops should not go after you if you are deffending your self.
Originally posted by MG era
I own the Getaway and i dont find it as fun as vice city,you can't do as much and it gets borring after a while,
but the getaway is more graphically better and it is more realistic, it brings london to life and i like it alot especially the car's but it just not in the league of GTA:Vice city
Originally posted by M5Power
...in your opinion.
Laughable. What else do you want? More real cars? It's already got more than Vice City. A bigger city? It's already several times the size (and complexity) of Vice City, and it's a true, mapped city.
Vice has so many glitches and dumb engineering mistakes I sometimes wonder why I bought it in the first place. It is simply no improvement over GTA3. [/B]
No argument here.Originally posted by the_cobbinator
Dang... Everybody said everything I want in the game.![]()
Maybe if you beat it 100% you train the next Tommy and pick out missions off of a list. You follow him around and see if he's good enough. Actually now that I think about it that is very stupid.![]()
Originally posted by Chris Criswell
Grand Theft Auto
Grand Theft Auto: London 1969
Grand Theft Auto II
Grand Theft Auto III
Grand Theft Auto: Vice City
So Vice City was the 5th different GTA game of the series, therefore if the next GTA was to be a number, it would be Grand Theft Auto 6, But I guess they shrugged off the whole Number in the
game name thing![]()
Originally posted by Chris Hendriks
london 1969 was just an add-on,so wa VC.its been posted before.
Originally posted by KieranMurphy
Vice City isn't really an add on, is it? It doesn't actually ADD to anything. It's not like it's an expansion pack for GTA3 or anything. An add on is usually something that needs the original to run and adds extra stuff to it, like the Tribunal add on for Morrowind.
Originally posted by Chris Hendriks
a bunch of people on this site told me they were both an add-on
Originally posted by KieranMurphy
Well, they were obviously wrong, weren't they?
An add-on for a game is something that you buy that "adds on" to an existing game. If Vice City were something that cost less than GTA3, needed GTA3 to run and added new characters or levels or areas or vehicles etc. on top of what already existed in GTA3, then it would be an "add on".
The reason Vice City isn't an "add on" is because it doesn't "add on" to anything. It's an independent game in it's own right.
KM.
Originally posted by M5Power
Obviously you're right, but they weren't sequels in the normal sense.
Originally posted by KieranMurphy
Very true. The 1986 Vice City storyline obviously wasn't a sequel to the Grand Theft Auto 3 storyline in any sort of traditional sense. But it's also fair and sensible to say also that Vice City is not an add on to Grand Theft Auto 3 in any traditional or non-traditional sense of the idea "add on".
KM.
Originally posted by M5Power
Right, though I think Chris Hendriks didn't really know what an add-on was so he labeled the games as 'add-ons.'