GTDesigned: A Community Vision GT Project

We'll going to add a series of poll for 3 days, for now the layout


  • Total voters
    116
  • Poll closed .
c46c533c0373011bb583a53b03a59093_zps09e94607.jpg

I redrew the car. The front splitter under the front vent you see is split in two and car change its angle for more downforce.
It seems like it would be that of a MR SWB sports car.
 
That was, um, unexpected. I don't see the resemblance, but my friend just told me what my sketch looks like.

l_4f35040feb77c.jpg


Oops.
(RIIIIIIDGE RACER)
 
Last edited:
did a few quick rought sketches just to get a few ideas down. let me know what you think.
vis5_zpsba6b01e0.jpg
vis6_zps3f1ad5b7.jpg
vis8_zps5179153d.jpg
vis9_zps9f8bffbe.jpg
vis10_zpsdbb4e321.jpg

1. It looks muscular and powerful, but still small, sticking with the whole "city car" vibe. I like this one a lot.

2. It's low, wide, and shouts "performance," while still looking sleek enough to be a concept car.

3. I could see this one being a front wheel drive warrior (or maybe the car is longer, probably because of the angle) on both the street and the dirt. I like this one as well.

4,5. Terrific job with your last concept car. It has the lines of a sportscar, but something else about it says that it could be a rally car as well, be it the extreme aerodynamics of the high-ish suspension. Great job on all of your cars, man.
 
did a few quick rought sketches just to get a few ideas down. let me know what you think.
vis5_zpsba6b01e0.jpg
vis6_zps3f1ad5b7.jpg
vis8_zps5179153d.jpg
vis9_zps9f8bffbe.jpg
vis10_zpsdbb4e321.jpg
Very nice drawing style, as others have said, the influence of Audi, Corvette is clear but also that they are original designs. Surely the last one could be scaled to fit the City Car size and mid engined to fit the criteria.
 
I checked the poll results (which are at located at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...00p24I-8_rX7COaK-ZEJ0vqkU/edit#gid=2106188636) and by throwing out the "not-applicable results" (engine configuration, # of cylinders, stroke-cycle from people who voted for rotary/wankel) the results are actually a flat-6 two-stoke. I honestly think we should use a flat-6 four-stroke in the rear of the car and a v4 two-stroke in the front, along with electric motors for a triple hybrid vehicle.
 
Dang, I don't have time to actually render my vehicle (TOO MANY DETAILS AGH)

Might as well show my reveal via pencil and paper. 👍

I checked the poll results (which are at located at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...00p24I-8_rX7COaK-ZEJ0vqkU/edit#gid=2106188636) and by throwing out the "not-applicable results" (engine configuration, # of cylinders, stroke-cycle from people who voted for rotary/wankel) the results are actually a flat-6 two-stoke. I honestly think we should use a flat-6 four-stroke in the rear of the car and a v4 two-stroke in the front, along with electric motors for a triple hybrid vehicle.

Wait a minute.

We were supposed to do that? Oops.
 
I checked the poll results (which are at located at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...00p24I-8_rX7COaK-ZEJ0vqkU/edit#gid=2106188636) and by throwing out the "not-applicable results" (engine configuration, # of cylinders, stroke-cycle from people who voted for rotary/wankel) the results are actually a flat-6 two-stoke. I honestly think we should use a flat-6 four-stroke in the rear of the car and a v4 two-stroke in the front, along with electric motors for a triple hybrid vehicle.
Was it still a mid engined, city car? Will that fit?
 
Back