No, it went from me explaining it was different to me explaining how it was different.So it went from "the 3000GT was heavier because it was more technologically advanced than anything else", which it wasn't; to "the 3000GT was heavier because it was larger than its closest competitors and had a heavier drivetrain", which it wasn't appreciably and didn't; to "the 3000GT was heavier because the GT-R extensively used aluminum" which beyond the front fenders and hood it didn't; to (bizarrely), "the 3000GT was heavier because the interior was nicer than the GT-R's," which I suppose it was, but they didn't put 600 pounds of more stereo or better air conditioning into it and neither of them were horning in on an 500 SL or 840Ci.
When can we skip the middleman and get to how "the 3000GT was heavier because Mitsubishi didn't do a very good job designing it to hide that they built it off of a full size FWD pseudo-luxury sedan", something borne out by how it was an also-ran before it even came out?
Nothing is different all those things apply
The car was bigger, it was significantly wider then every generation of GT-R from R32 to R34(and that's including the widened wheel arches not body of the GT-R over the Skyline Chassis(the GTO didn't have extended wheel arches as it was the car it was intended to be).That's particularly strange, since none of "those things" are actually true. The 3000GT wasn't a particularly larger car than the R32 (certainly not the also-significantly-lighter R33). The 3000GT's drivetrain definitely didn't contribute to its heavier weight over the 90's Skylines. The 3000GT wasn't a particularly lavishly equipped car in comparison to the 1990s Skylines. The R32 didn't feature a particularly aluminum-intensive construction, since the few body panels that were done in aluminum was primarily done to try and offset the horrible weight distribution caused by the the (again, significantly heavier than the Mitsubishi's) engine. And while the Skyline didn't have the electronic adjustable dampening that the 3000GT did, Nissan already had a similar system in the Z32 that they deliberately did not include in the R32. And both the R32 and the Z32 also had a more advanced 4WS system than the one in the Mitsubishi. And the R32 had a dramatically more advanced AWD system than the Mitsubishi did.
The 3000GT was a car that weighed over 600 pounds more than its most direct rival on paper despite not matching it in mechanical sophistication, to the extent that even in markets that never came close to getting said rival it was considered a bit of a pig; and the best justification you can give to defend why was that it had "fat cushy seats". The stripper base model Dodge sold, which would have had trouble outrunning a contemporary Buick Regal and had absolutely none of that amazing exciting tech that Nissan had already debuted on the market (or even a cassette player), was by itself almost as heavy as the GT-R.
And since this is hardly the first time you've staggered into a thread, spouted a bunch of nonsense and then continuously devolved your argument from the initial one to try and find something that can stick, I think my "simplistic condescending argument" has quite a bit more basis than the one where (once again) you didn't feel even basic fact checking was required before making it.
I have a friend at work who owns about 4-5 of these cars for that reason alone....We rarely ever see those nowadays, I guess for that reason alone it's worthy of a "cool" rating, but only for people who know what it is. However, people who know what it is also happen to know it's an absolute nightmare to work on (transversely mounted twin turbo V6 is genius, although in that regard the Z32 TT is also an absolute packaging nightmare), the replacement parts are not cheap because they're scarce, all those electronic doodads will eventually fail... It's like a Japanese 7 series.
Anyone remember they also had a version later on that was a metal-roofed convertible (the Spyder) that could be available as an automatic, non-turbo front wheel drive? That it was available in a sort of watered down pee yellow color? And that they sold those for nearly 60k? And that it could barely beat the Earth's rotation in a drag race?
Amusing video might tickle the fancy of people who fondly remember the car from GT1
I mean... this is what GT is
I'm so lost right now.
Warum ist es ein gebrauchtwagen and not a used car?