GTP Cool Wall: 2016+ Range Rover Evoque Convertible

  • Thread starter Wiegert
  • 88 comments
  • 3,929 views

2016+ Range Rover Evoque Convertible


  • Total voters
    133
  • Poll closed .
Word for word what I said.

A Car that would be cool for a Female, but not a Male will be uncool here, other way around and it will be Cool here.
72948ddd52.jpg
 
Okay, seriously; who the heck would drive a convertible in the snow with the roof down? That's just madness.

@Azuremen

(If I knew where to find that photo of the MR2 in the snow, that would be here too)

Word for word what I said.

A Car that would be cool for a Female, but not a Male will be uncool here, other way around and it will be Cool here.

There are many, many examples of why that's not true.
 
Nobody told Land Rover that Nissan tried to do this in the past and did not work?

Still, it's better looking than the Murano...

I want to give it a Cool, but a Meh is more reasonable.
 
Okay, seriously; who the heck would drive a convertible in the snow with the roof down? That's just madness.

I've done it many times in the past. Partly for the lulz, partly because visibility out of a convertible with the top is generally horrible.

Relevant image
WS9xzh.jpg


Word for word what I said.

A Car that would be cool for a Female, but not a Male will be uncool here, other way around and it will be Cool here.

It is 2016, who gives a **** about gender normative nonsense these days? Besides insecure guys like Donald Trump.

For reference, I voted Cool. First time I saw photos of this thing pop up, I was like "you know, I kind of like it."

Sub-zero would be a some fast convertible ute. I like convertibles, I like utes, can I just have both?
 
Last edited:
2016+ Range Rover Evoque
Low Cool
2-door convertible
Ok then. Brings it down to a meh.
2.0L turbocharged I4, 2.0L turbo diesel I4
Power: 150-180 hp (diesel), 240 hp (petrol)
Still meh
250-280 lb-ft
Still meh
Brings it down to low meh
9-speed automatic
Brings it down to uncool
Front-engine, all wheel drive
Brings it back up to just below meh
 
I actually quite fancy it. And I don't fancy Victoria Beckham.

The original Evoque is the answer to the question nobody asked. It serves absolutely no practical purpose.

But it looks good. It actually drives nicely. And it makes you feel like a million dollars. The convertible, on the other hand, is a big middle finger to the rest of the motoring world. Signaling that you don't give a flying finagle about body rigidity, safety, refinement or what anyone else thinks about your ride.

I can dig that.

Sub zero.

 
It was better when Jeremy Clarkson cut out an image of a standard Evoque as if it had it's roof off. The fact that Land Rover actually made the car is laughable. Uncool.
 
Back