An 800hp Viper would.And all the 100 hp/L cars can't go any faster.
An 800hp Viper would.And all the 100 hp/L cars can't go any faster.
hopefully not destroyed like most concepts are.
Concept car, uncool. 8.0L V10 with only 500 hp seriously uncool.
That's a rather false statement. There's plenty 100+ hp/L cars that are faster in different ways.
With that big of an engine, the torque curve is as flat as a pancake, you can accelerate from almost any rpm. Not being tuned highly also makes it more reliable,
Not a whole lot of cars in 2000 that were faster.
I'm aware of the advantages and that doesn't change it from being seriously uncool to me.
If it had 800 bhp, and was just as reliable as any other decent 100 hp/L car, would you think that was uncool?
hopefully not destroyed like most concepts are.
.
What if it had that 800 hp from a 30 L engine? Why would the displacement matter at all?
Specific output tends to imply quite a bit about an engine -- the nature of its torque curve, its intended purpose/use, expected longevity or maintenance requirements, how much performance potential is left...Higher specific output isn't "better," but a lower specific output in a performance-oriented engine implies that more power was left on the table, and also a more low-RPM-oriented torque curve. There are advantages to that sort of engine design -- there are tradeoffs any way you do it -- but it's not everyone's preferred "style".What if it had that 800 hp from a 30 L engine? Why would the displacement matter at all?
The stuff of automotive wet dreams. Should have gone into production.
Should have gone into production.
Forever subzero for me.
Which was a much better looking (if still rather silly and highly anti-social) vehicle.
Because a 30L engine would be way too big and heavy, weight saving is one of the most important factors when building a sports car. Also tax and insurance would be insane.
Bold bit might explain why I love Vipers.
snip
Because a 30L engine would be way too big and heavy, weight saving is one of the most important factors when building a sports car. Also tax and insurance would be insane.
But in the end, all those other things you mentioned are what's important. The actual hp/L means nothing unless maybe you don't know anything else about the engine.Specific output tends to imply quite a bit about an engine -- the nature of its torque curve, its intended purpose/use, expected longevity or maintenance requirements, how much performance potential is left...Higher specific output isn't "better," but a lower specific output in a performance-oriented engine implies that more power was left on the table, and also a more low-RPM-oriented torque curve. There are advantages to that sort of engine design -- there are tradeoffs any way you do it -- but it's not everyone's preferred "style".
Of course. But I don't see why hp/L on its own has anything to do with coolness. Or anything.It obviously doesn't mean the Viper is slow, but I think eight6er is entitled to the opinion that it isn't cool.
500 hp from a low weight, compact engine arrangement is uncool?8.0L V10 with only 500 hp seriously uncool.
The specific output boys are here.
Because researching our claims would just be too much.
OK. The Viper has a 50/50 weight disribution, weighs around as much as the F430/458, and probably gets better mileage while being FR and having a steel frame. The engine obviously isn't weighing it down.
It does however give it power and perhaps more important, power over man revs, that will easy match a lot of other cars.
A 30L engine could potentially be quite heavy, but really on paper displacement tells you nothing about weight.
The published weight for the Audi R8's V-10 was more than that of the Z06 V-8 and the one in the S7 TT. I think hp/weight is an important number. hp/L, not so much.
But in the end, all those other things you mentioned are what's important. The actual hp/L means nothing unless maybe you don't know anything else about the engine.
Of course. But I don't see why hp/L on its own has anything to do with coolness. Or anything.
500 hp from a low weight, compact engine arrangement is uncool?
10,000 lbs is heavy considering there's not much there besides the engine and wheels. The engine alone is probably bigger than most cars I've owned
Which was a much better looking.
Technically it did, but as this: