- 7,517
- Connecticut
- Cowboys965
3 wins \o/
GTPlanet 2012 Fantasy Football League
- Thread starter FoolKiller
- 643 comments
- 24,238 views
- Status
- 17,412
- Corneria City
- Orbital_Goat
I just tried to join but it said the registration is over.
No wait, forget it, my mistake, I assumed it was proper football.
Duh!
You're out of luck there as well, registration for "proper football" closed way back in September.
With nothing to lose in my semifinal matchup against Villain, I've decided to take a chance and give Rams wideout Chris Givens the start over Jason Avant.
Last edited:
- 4,687
- Golden State
- xViLLaiNx12
- 3,359
- California
- PumpinNumbies
By all means, show me where my logic is wrong. You know I was right, or you wouldn't have spent so long trying to get rid of him. Just because Richardson had a good year, doesn't mean my reasoning for avoiding him wasn't accurate. I chose the safe route, and Ridley remains a top 10 RB. So, again, show me where my logic is wrong.
- 4,687
- Golden State
- xViLLaiNx12
By all means, show me where my logic is wrong. You know I was right, or you wouldn't have spent so long trying to get rid of him. Just because Richardson had a good year, doesn't mean my reasoning for avoiding him wasn't accurate. I chose the safe route, and Ridley remains a top 10 RB. So, again, show me where my logic is wrong.
1300 total yards, 12 touchdowns, 203.70 fan points.
Actually, it totally means your reasoning was innacurate.
He's a beast and he had a great year in spite a weak offense and collegiate injuries. (Thank you Joe Thomas)
- 7,517
- Connecticut
- Cowboys965
Are we doing playoff fantasy too?
I think its on the NFL website.
I think its on the NFL website.
- 3,359
- California
- PumpinNumbies
1300 total yards, 12 touchdowns, 203.70 fan points.
Actually, it totally means your reasoning was innacurate.
I can't tell if you're trolling, or if you just don't get it.
With the choice below, which RB would you rather have?
Bad offense, bad support cast, Rookie QB, WR's notorious for drops, Rookie with 2 knee surgeries.
vs
The best offense in the NFL, Tom Brady, 4 Super Star WR/TEs.
It doesn't matter how often #1 comes out ahead in this scenario, entering the season, the logical choice is to take option #2. Whether it comes out right or wrong, doesn't alter nor disprove the logic at hand.
So, regardless of what you may think, my logic was and still remains sound. The 23 point difference between the two RB's at hand, makes this discussion even more of a joke.
- 7,517
- Connecticut
- Cowboys965
I got 1st place in my other league.
<---- Champion
<---- Champion
- 6,796
- California
I got 1st place in my other league.
<---- Champion
I bet you didn't use the same draft strategy.
- 3,359
- California
- PumpinNumbies
Villain, on a serious note, I'm curious...
Who would you start this week, assuming you didn't trade away T.Rich for F.Gore?
Who would you start this week, assuming you didn't trade away T.Rich for F.Gore?
- 3,359
- California
- PumpinNumbies
- 3,273
- London
- Chqr
I would love to see us do an Auction Draft through NFL.com for next season.
Auction Drafts offer so much more in terms of strategy and getting a roster that YOU want than rather HAVE to have. The general consensus with the limitations of a Snake Draft is that you almost have to go and out and get a certain player if the player you wanted was picked earlier. So for say you wanted RGIII in the first round and he was taken by somebody else, you will probably feel obliged to take Wilson/Kaepernick/Rodgers or Manning as they will almost definitely be taken in the first round by the other guys. You almost feel like the creation of your team is out of your own hands.
With the Auction Draft, you're given $200 to build your roster on a Live Auction. So you can and go out and get the players you want and pay as much as you're willing to pay to get them without the notion that you have to settle with someone as the entire pool is available to everyone. Of course, if you overspend you run the risk of having to settle but that's all part of the strategy.
NFL.com FTW.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-fantasy/0ap2000000050134/NFL-Fantasy-Live-Auction-draft-strategy
Auction Drafts offer so much more in terms of strategy and getting a roster that YOU want than rather HAVE to have. The general consensus with the limitations of a Snake Draft is that you almost have to go and out and get a certain player if the player you wanted was picked earlier. So for say you wanted RGIII in the first round and he was taken by somebody else, you will probably feel obliged to take Wilson/Kaepernick/Rodgers or Manning as they will almost definitely be taken in the first round by the other guys. You almost feel like the creation of your team is out of your own hands.
With the Auction Draft, you're given $200 to build your roster on a Live Auction. So you can and go out and get the players you want and pay as much as you're willing to pay to get them without the notion that you have to settle with someone as the entire pool is available to everyone. Of course, if you overspend you run the risk of having to settle but that's all part of the strategy.
NFL.com FTW.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-fantasy/0ap2000000050134/NFL-Fantasy-Live-Auction-draft-strategy
- 3,273
- London
- Chqr
- 4,687
- Golden State
- xViLLaiNx12
I don't know. Since you're asking me a hypothetical about my team while revisioning my transactions, I'm not sure who I'd have on my team. If my team hadn't changed since trading for Gore, I'm assuming I would've gone with Benjarvus Green-Ellis. 👍
#FirstPlaceProblems #NotLunacyFootballProblems
- 24,553
- Frankfort, KY
- GTP_FoolKiller
- FoolKiller1979
You realize the draft is designed after the real NFL draft, right?
Now, using an auction system for free agents, that's a different thing. In fact, I could work out a system so that your available free agent cash is based on the value of your draft picks so that it is close to emulating the salary cap.
- Status
