Gumpert Apollo S or Bugatti Veyron?

  • Thread starter jayl2910
  • 101 comments
  • 8,043 views
The Veyron is only good for top speed, the Gumpert can turn a corner. Therefore, the Gumpert.
 
The Gumpert, just for the insanity of it. I bet you can get your pessenger to beg for mercy in that thign quite easily.
 
The Gumpert (see top gear test), but indeed if you want to be comfortable the Bugatti is very much ahead.
 
Gumpert over and over again. Solely for the pure "ugliness" of the car that you will forget about as soon as you turn the key.
 
Mreh. A bit like asking "Formula 1 car or AMG Mercedes S class?", "F-22 Raptor or B-2 Spirit?"

It's a simple question of speed vs. comfort.

That said, Veyron. I can't pass up a W16 engine with 4 turbos.
0
(Thanks RocZX
 
Last edited:
mreh. A bit like asking "formula 1 car or amg mercedes s class?", "f-22 raptor or b-2 spirit?"

it's a simple question of speed vs. Comfort.

That said, veyron. I can't pass up a w12 engine with 4 turbos.

w16 engine
I say the Veyon but the Super Sport one.
 
Gumpert Apollo by miles. I would pay the Veyron's price for the Gumpert, but wouldn't pay the Gumpert's price for the Veyron.
 
The Veyron is only good for top speed, the Gumpert can turn a corner. Therefore, the Gumpert.

Troll much? You're going to notice the difference between a 1 minute 17 second lap and a 1 minute 18 second lap? That's turning a corner versus not turning a corner?

Obviously the Veyron is the way to go. The Gumpert is a very limited vehicle basically intended for track use. None of you on this thread could ever possibly notice the difference in performance between the Gumpert and the Veyron (even on the track). All of you will notice the difference in noise, ride, build quality, interior materials quality, comfort, and amenities.
 
Danoff
Troll much? You're going to notice the difference between a 1 minute 17 second lap and a 1 minute 18 second lap? That's turning a corner versus not turning a corner?

Obviously the Veyron is the way to go. The Gumpert is a very limited vehicle basically intended for track use. None of you on this thread could ever possibly notice the difference in performance between the Gumpert and the Veyron (even on the track). All of you will notice the difference in noise, ride, build quality, interior materials quality, comfort, and amenities.

Maybe he wasn't talking about lap times. The Veyron probably made all it's time up in the straights and it would be hard for me to imagine it being anything than a tank through the corners. Doesnt sound fun at all. Aside from this, it's generally accepted that the Top Gear power lap board is an exceedingly poor judge of a car's performance.

You bring up a good point, though. One that I agree with. Most people don't truly understand how uncomfortable and noisy it is to drive a really stripped down car until they've bought one thinking "oh, I'm tough. I can handle a bit of a racket."
 
According to Top Gear, the Apollo is so hardcore, they don't even let you adjust the seating in fear of ruining the car's weight balance. Too hardcore for me, so I'll go with the Veyron.
 
Maybe he wasn't talking about lap times. The Veyron probably made all it's time up in the straights and it would be hard for me to imagine it being anything than a tank through the corners. Doesnt sound fun at all. Aside from this, it's generally accepted that the Top Gear power lap board is an exceedingly poor judge of a car's performance.

It can't be a tank through the corners and come out with that lap time. Not possible. I'd wager that most of the people viewing this thread would be too scared to take a veyron to its cornering limits. The SuperSport is listed at 1.4 lateral g's.
 
Style, class, comfort and epic speed. I choose the Veyron. Plus the warranty is likely better than the Apollo as is the company who manufactured it. :D
 
Can I plead neither? The Veyron is WAY too played out (not to mention awkward-looking), and the Gumpert doesn't do anything for me either. I think there are more attractive cars that still handle superbly - think Pagani Zonda, Ferrari Enzo, etc.

But if I'm forced to choose one or the other, probably the Veyron simply because it's better appointed inside... I could at least be comfy as I try to forget about what the rest of the world sees me rolling by in...

I think this is more or less an apples vs. oranges comparison.
 
yes It's basiclly the choice between a road use race car Vs a faisability study made into production.

I know you're not the OP, but this thread would benefit from a poll I think. It'd be interesting to see how many fall on which side of the proverbial fence.

For me it would be luxury over speed most days.
 
Yeah poll yould be handy.

It's a difficult question as they don't really compare.
If money is not a problem, the veyron would be my daily driver (it handles legal speeds well for such an engine) and the Gumpert would be for fast and track use.
 
Veyron for the sheer fact it can do everything the Apollo did (which is nothing more than a hardcore racer built for the street) & more.
 
Troll much? You're going to notice the difference between a 1 minute 17 second lap and a 1 minute 18 second lap? That's turning a corner versus not turning a corner?

Obviously the Veyron is the way to go. The Gumpert is a very limited vehicle basically intended for track use. None of you on this thread could ever possibly notice the difference in performance between the Gumpert and the Veyron (even on the track). All of you will notice the difference in noise, ride, build quality, interior materials quality, comfort, and amenities.

They Veyron is so undertested that I don't think that there is any good indication of its performance. That said, it's not much different for the Gumpert.

Still, I'd personally wager that the Top Gear Lap times are making the Veyron out to be better than it is. I do really wish I could have my opinion verified or debunked though.

Gumpert all the way for me, the Veyron simply cannot be compared to that car. Even if I couldn't handle the Apollo, getting it to 50% would probably bring me more joy than setting the lap record at every track ever built in the Bugatti.
 
Veyron.

The driver ergonomics in the Gumpert is a deal breaker, actually I will sell the Veyron and buy a GT3RS4.0 and a 458. :D

I don't understand the following the Gumpert has, it is not a particularly good handling car (very understeer biased and not modulatable mid corner), it's just a lot of grip and downforce with also a lot of power. shock value yes but you can have more fun in things way less expensive and slower. Things that you can actually enjoy a bit on normal back roads. The gumpert also has no heritage, history whatsoever.
 
The driver ergonomics in the Gumpert is a deal breaker, actually I will sell the Veyron and buy a GT3RS4.0 and a 458. :D

I'd sell the Veyron and buy myself a Scooby, Mini, Elise and STILL have enough to buy a house.
 
I'd honestly have to take them both for a long drive and give them both a good testing. Leaning towards the Veyron slightly, though it says something about the Veyron when someone prefers the looks of the Gumpert Apollo, which I do.

Not that I'd EVER be in the position to buy one of either.
 
Gumpert. Might be able to afford to use it, and not worry about $20,000 tire changes. Among other ridiculousness.
 
If it's the Apollo S vs. the Super Sport, my vote goes to the SS (as long as I can opt out of that horrible orange trim). If it's the Apollo Supercharged... things just got a whole lot closer. The power disadvantadge suddenly isn't nearly as big, the handling isn't likely to be much worse... I'm thinking that thing could beat up a Veyron SS if driven properly.
 
Back