At this point I don't think we can do any... or no, lets rephrase that. At this point anything is better than Bush.
No, they'd want her to get elected so they'd have an easier time committing their terrorist acts.
i think ill start my own party. i shall call it the "who really gives a 🤬 party" no matter who gets elected its still gunna suck. i guess it doesn't really matter to me though because im not old enough to vote or really be affected by any taxes.
I dont really care who's in office unless they start messing with car laws. the only good thing about having been moved to florida is no inspection so i can run my car ( when i get one ) with my mufflers off and do whatever ( within reason ) as long as its not visible to a cop.
You're an idiot. No explanation necessary.
They already thanked the Democrats:
"...you aren't the ones who won the midterm elections, nor are the Republicans the ones who lost. Rather, the Mujahideen -- the Muslim Ummah's vanguard in Afghanistan and Iraq -- are the ones who won, and the American forces and their Crusader allies are the ones who lost," - Ayman al Zawahri
Zawahri sent this message to the Democrats after their win in the Congressional elections. Funny how the Mainstream Media did not report this at all.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/12/al_qaeda_sends_.html
I just listened to an incredibly biased "report" on the local ABC channel. It started from the EPA telling you what you should give up to improve the valley's air to being skeptical about a Pentagon report describing a Blackhawk crash in Iraq wasn't downed by "suspected military insurgents" while adding perversely the deaths of three more servicemen and then finally topping off with Hillary's pledge to take down the Republican administration. At the very end, ABC added that Sam Brownback is also in the race for the Republicans. Gee, thanks ABC, I had to put up with your **** to find out that he's in it too.
Isn't he known for cleaning up a lot of New York City? What I like about him would be: 1) He has the recognition and support from the 9/11 like you said. Hillary Clinton also has recognition going for her, and I think it's huge. 2) He's experienced. Mayorship of NYC was a pretty big job, and while I wasn't paying a close attention, I thought he took some big, gutsy steps. He also seems like a good politician. A good liar, good communicator, lots of connections, not many enemies.The thing about Guliani is that he has the card of being NYC mayor during the terrorist attacks. I'm not too sure of how that support would be deserved, because it has nothing to do with his politics. Of course, we aren't dealing with a crazy Bush here, either.
What we need are some more moderate candidates. None of these extremist christians/republicans. Which is why Rudy is pretty cool. I do feel that my vote will go toward the left, probably directed at Barack.
What we need are some more moderate candidates. None of these extremist christians/republicans. Which is why Rudy is pretty cool. I do feel that my vote will go toward the left, probably directed at Barack.
Whoever is pro-life and anti-homosexuality gets my vote.
Hopefully one of them will be that...
Don't worry. I'm sure some hardliner conservative will run.Whoever is pro-life and anti-homosexuality gets my vote.
Hopefully one of them will be that...
Whoever is pro-life and anti-homosexuality gets my vote.
Hopefully one of them will be that...
Don't worry. I'm sure some hardliner conservative will run (I actually thought of an incredibly funny joke to say about this, but I decided it was better to not post it, but with the post above and below mine opening the floodgates I may reconsider).
Edit: You know? Why the hell not:
<-- The perfect candidate.
Rednecks are not permitted to run for President FYIWhoever is pro-life and anti-homosexuality gets my vote.
Hopefully one of them will be that...
I think he might have worded that statement wrong? I don't think he's talking about gay-bashers, guys. I could be wrong, but I(again)think he's talking about anti-gay marriage type stance.
And if I was way off on that mark and he really is hoping someone who's anti-gay to take the office, I have to ask, how about their rights? Just like how you have your right to exercise Christianity in this country.
Not to derail this thread entirely, but if Delirious is talking about anti-gay marriage, I have to agree. I don't really have anything against gay people, but I don't want gay marriage legalized in every state, and thus would set a bad example for kids.
Oh please. Set a bad example for kids?
The example of "if you're gay you should be able to marry"? THAT example?!
Edwards is running? Christ, his fake (superduperOMGkillme) charisma is so annoying. How could you vote for someone so obviously slimy? He's the fakest guys since John Kerry.
Really, did he not announce his candidacy in New Orleans? Such a slimeball move, clearly trying to capitalize on the "Oh, he feels for the Katrina victims and he's so dreamy" vote. He's not even from Louisiana, so WTF?
Seriously, zero good candidates. Don't vote. For the sake of all that is good in the world do no vote.