Should early pioneers have given up just because they could not get a powered plane off the ground for more that just a few seconds?
The question arises: why did Da Vinci never really build a helicopter?
Of course, he had the technical expertise to try and design one. He had a good idea of how to build the engine to power one. And he was intelligent enough (an IQ between 180-200 is a good guess) to work through the development process. So why didn't he build one?
For one thing, he didn't have the tools, the materials or the industry backing available. Even if Da Vinci were smart enough to build a personal computer, he would not have had anywhere to buy transistors and microchips, nor any of the facilities for making one.
Powered flight was a long time coming because the proper industrial and technical base was needed before it became possible.
Human-powered flight took longer because it took decades for materials technology to reach that point.
Right now, there are millions upon millions of dollars being spent on researching and developing battery technology. At the moment, electric endurance cars are still impractical and even if there were a solution, it would still be too costly. You'd need vastly better controllers to balance out the charging and to ensure nothing blows up if you want to charge an electric pack capable of 100 miles within less than a minute... it would require much better battery materials and a humongous amount of processing power packed into a small and economical package.
Not happening... yet.
Seriously speaking - I have no idea. Perhaps purpose-built enduro electric-juice suckers could have battery-swapping implemented, but Tesla doesn't have that system in stock. How about an available enduro-battery mod, which would enable that functionality and perhaps added a few kilograms?
The Tesla already has "extended range" batteries. Any more extended and it would weigh another half-ton more.
Look up the top gear test of the tesla roadster.
That was faked. They admitted that they "simulated" the battery running out... Top Gear is entertainment... not journalism.
On board generators would be good for endurance racing. It will keep the racing in pure electric motor. Hybrids will just put bigger petrol motors so it can dominate when the batteries discharge and run purely on the petrol motor so it wouldn't be a fair race agianst all electric powered cars.
On-board generators still require fuel. And to actually charge the batteries faster than they are being depleted, they'd have to be a dozen times more powerful than the electric motors at the wheels.
At which point, you might as well just connect the generator straight to the electric motors.
Or even better... just connect the generator to a transmission.
I have heard something about new batteries which can charge up in about 5 minutes or seomthing ridiculously short, now whether the tesla has them or not i dont know but it could be sort of feasible.
I guess fuel cell beats this... just pop in some hydrogen.
Nanosafe was also supposed to be working on this separately, but so far, no product, yet.
Fuel cells would be an excellent answer to this problem... they're incredibly, stupidly, expensive, but they'll work.