Glad you like it!
------------------------------------------------------------
Here is capture of the AutoQuoter plug-in for AutoCad I mentioned in my first post on this thread.
AutoQuoter will not actually create the design for you, or select the 80/20 parts automatically (you should have at least a rough conceptual schematic done first as well as their catalog to reference 80/20 part numbers).
But it will assemble the rig using 80/20 parts you specify down to spec. which helps eliminate guesswork.
It really helps visualize how everything will connect, exactly what parts/machining will be required, and will also generate a bill of materials down to the fasteners for an accurate $ estimate.
![]()
You might have to get acquainted with AutoCad's command line, in some cases it has to be invoked, that documentation/tech support should be available through 80/20.
It will work with both the trial version and the Academic version.
Yes, but the Academic Version has a Watermark. For More Info:
...and for clarification the mentor you refer to is an Autodesk-sponsored design competition mentor.
-------------------------------------------------------------
The thing to remember is this, you should have a good working knowledge of the 80/20 stuff before even getting to this stage. Good enough to have the concept down on something like graph paper along with key part numbers.
You actually have to manually select the tubes and fasteners to be used by part numbers in the software.
Getting the tubes' general measurements is probably the easiest part. the hardest part is to correctly ID what the correct fastening and joining plates are, because if you make a mistake its costly.
In that case, most likely your measurements will also have to be re-worked, which also means re-cutting tubes.
Check 80/20's online distributor list for your closest distributor, a lot of them have 80/20 demo vans, that's a great way to get a hands-on with the stuff.
See:
I suggest building a few small things before taking on a rig. That's what I did and it really helped me avoid costly design mistakes.
Metric or fractional (standard). I would make that decision based on the system used in your country of residence. Your stats indicate you are in the US.
Sometimes metric stuff can be harder to source here in the US (fasteners and etc. to be used with the 80/20 extrusion) so that is really the only advantage I can think of. If I were in the EU, I would do metric.
One of the biggest differences between metric and fractional 80/20 was that the metric had a smooth finish. 80/20 now offers the 15 series fractional extrusion in smooth finish, but not the 10 series fractional.
From what you describe, this 80/20 rig over at the Fanatec Wheel Fan Site by TommyD. is similar to what you want to do. And he has the plans posted in PDF.
You may have to scale it down because it has a pretty big footprint and is not built for portability.
If you intend to do right angles you can save money on fastening through anchor bolt machining.
...but anchor bolts mean that you are pretty much stuck with the measurements you choose because it replaces fastening plates that can provide adjustment flexibility/fine-tuning.
Remember though, if you go with lighter gauge extrusion (10 S vs. 15 S fractional) that means that you may have to spend additional money to re-inforce it. It all depends on the degree of portability you want.
I used both 10 S and 15 S fractional for mine, but that also posed design challenges and cost more $ to do.
That's because I wanted it be both rock solid and very portable without compromise.
Nice and cheap step up from your glass table & speakers would be a wheel stand and real car seat.
Pretty stable too.