- 29,944
- Bratvegas
- GTP_Liquid
Way ahead of you:Steak by itself is a salad because there is no core 'starch' present.
If a salad is anything free of structural starch, I'm sure glad whiskey counts as a salad.
Way ahead of you:Steak by itself is a salad because there is no core 'starch' present.
If a salad is anything free of structural starch, I'm sure glad whiskey counts as a salad.
What the diddly darn Smeg is a pile of Pancakes doing with the word "Flapjacks" under it. Utter shunt of a comment there.A burger with three or more buns will be a cake. Two will just be a sandwich. The classification of the food is based on the locations of the starch in a meal.
View attachment 1190992
Source: https://cuberule.com/
Nachos!So a Big Mac is a cake. Good to know.
What if the starch is in the product? Like croutons in soup?
In America (and maybe Canada?) flapjacks are pancakes. The term "flapjack" is not used nearly as often as "pancakes", but I'd guess that it's used in this case because of the word "cake" in "pancake" being too suggestive that it actually belongs in the "cake" category. The idea is for it to be fairly funny and obnoxious, so if it literally says "cake" in the word, it doesn't come off as being quite as funny.What the diddly darn Smeg is a pile of Pancakes doing with the word "Flapjacks" under it. Utter shunt of a comment there.
This is a flapjack, a dense oaty concoction glued together with a butter and syrup mixture.
View attachment 1191080
What ever they are, they're obviously not "cakes".Are crab cakes flapjacks?
Wait, no, they're nachos.
Crab cakes are expert level espionage assets.Are crab cakes flapjacks?
Wait, no, they're nachos.
I guess hero sandwiches are only a snack.Since when does a sandwich have to be light meal or a snack?
Coincidentally there's been a major, related legal development:This poll is closer than Brexit and about a million times more consequential.
Could the guy not have just opened his store in a different plaza rather than trying to convince them for 3 years and taking it to court?Coincidentally there's been a major, related legal development:
Indiana judge opens door for new eatery, finding `tacos and burritos are Mexican-style sandwiches'
An Indiana judge has cleared the way for the opening of a new restaurant after finding that “tacos and burritos are Mexican-style sandwiches."apnews.com
It's not his store. It's his plaza. He purchased property which had been re-zoned from single-family residential to limited commercial. The new zoning places restrictions on the nature of commercial development. Upon learning the nature of the business to be opened on the property that he'd developed, with rental commitments established, the city planning commission from whom he secured development permission objected.Could the guy not have just opened his store in a different plaza rather than trying to convince them for 3 years and taking it to court?
This poll is closer than Brexit and about a million times more consequential.
If you surround a single-family home with 2 bakeries, is it a sandwich?It's not his store. It's his plaza. He purchased property which had been re-zoned from single-family residential to limited commercial. The new zoning places restrictions on the nature of commercial development. Upon learning the nature of the business to be opened on the property that he'd developed, with rental commitments established, the city planning commission from whom he secured development permission objected.
The ruling doesn't actually define tacos as sandwiches, rather it establishes the nature of the business as complying with the spirit of the restrictions, and it includes language which isn't legally binding ("dicta") that has since been latched onto because it's humorous.
If you surround a single-family home with 2 bakeries, is it a sandwich?
Brexit achieved nothing. This poll is for the common good.
We’ll need proof.This may very well be the yeast of our problems.
I doughn't think so.We’ll need proof.
Don't egg him on.I doughn't think so.
Based on this, then eating a hotdog WITH a bun, would be considered a sandwich (following the logic that if you have a hamburger, it isn't a sandwich unless it is on a bun of some sort).The essence of a hotdog lies in the sausage itself, not necessarily in how it is served. One can consume the sausage by itself and still say “I ate a hotdog”, it retains its identity.
The term “hotdog” does not inherently imply the presence of a bun, which distinguishes itself from the concept of a sandwich.
A “sandwich” only qualifies to be a sandwich if it consists of one or more types of filling placed between two slices of bread or within a split roll or bun.
Therefore, a hotdog is not a sandwich. (Still voted “Yes” though, was bribed by the other party)
So what we're saying is that a hotdog with no bun is not a sandwich, a hotdog with a bun is a sandwich, and burger without a bun is not a sandwich, and a burger with a bun is a sandwich. Looks good to me.Based on this, then eating a hotdog WITH a bun, would be considered a sandwich (following the logic that if you have a hamburger, it isn't a sandwich unless it is on a bun of some sort).
Were you bribed with a hotdog to throw your vote?
You shouldn't. Many such cases. Here's another:If you take the literal meaning