Islam in America

Wow, I cannot get over this forum and the way we treat eachother.
There is an occasional argument, but thats usually about a video game. :)
Back on topic,
I have friends (I'm 14) that are complete rascist basterds.
They're not really my friends, but a lot of the time, this is very hard to ignore in the American public school system.
The media doesn't help either.
All my "friends" are like that because they watch South Park and TV shows like that. I do enjoy watching south park, but some of the stuff, all though it's funny, is down right insulting.
With that being said, without offending anyone, which I really hope I don't do by saying this, but even my grandfather told me, not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim.

I heard that one before, but I can't blame him for coming to that conclusion. It's the media really, they are a catalysts of sorts for misunderstanding.

Truth be told, I would have reminded him of the LRA, Nazis, and PETA if you're annoyed by them... and Sarah Palin if you can't stand her voice when she opens her mouth.:sly:
 
The view of Islam in the US, and honestly much of the world that is Christian in origins, is very skewed towards stereotypes. Very few people are familiar with the history of either, and are completely unaware that Islam was historically more tolerant towards other faiths than Catholicism. And Islam honestly helped develop several sciences that would later help the Europeans develop, along with the translation and preservation of the libraries at Madrid (from what I recall)

In modern times, most people tend to see it now through the lens of extremism, because that is what gathers the most attention. Very few people realize it would be much like non-Christians looking at Christians as if they were the Aryan Nations, KKK, or Westboro Baptist Church. But of course Americans don't really look at it this way on average, being that the US was built by Protestants.

Honestly, I think most high schools should offer a Theology course, where they cover the primary religions of the world to help students better understand other faiths. I myself would likely be quite a bit more ignorant of the history if I hadn't done some studies on the Mughal empire and later taken a course on the development of the Middle East. Some amazing elements to the culture, and probably the most beautiful written language in the world with Arabic.

As for practices in the faith of Islam, I do have my qualms. Though I also have issue with most major organized religions at this point. However, Islam does tend to have more discriminatory practices towards women, and some nations have the religious elements too closely tied to their government. In order to progress in the eyes of the modern world, Islam and government must be more separate in those nations. How to do this, I'm not really sure as faith is a complicated matter and further so when the government is based on the doctrines of a faith.

So, those are my thoughts. Average Americans are simply unaware of everything, and education is really the only solution but that will take time. As for myself, I have quite a bit of respect for the contributions through out history to society Islam has made, but currently feel that some nations need to shed elements to advance forward. On a more personal level, I've have no issue with Muslims unless they go fundamentalist on me and want me to look into converting. Hell, I've dated non-practicing Muslim girls before; quite cute I must say sometimes.

Just my 2 cents.

Thank you for contributing!:)

Actually women are guaranteed more rights compared to the other two religions when Islam first came about. Now, it became a matter of uneducated men dictating the lives of women by twisting any quote from the Quran or Hadith (Prophet's thoughts on certain matters) to justify their treatment.

And I'm all for the separation of government from religion, especially in the modern world. But a lot of Muslim countries claim that they are indeed a theocracy, so Islam must be the basis of their government.

It truth, it is very hard, or maybe even impossible to get a true government without any religious intervention.

If the American government is secular, why swear the oath on a Bible? Or on any religious texts for that matter. If it were me, it should be law that oaths are to be sworn on the Constitution, because that's what the elected officials are supposed to uphold.

And those girls can get very cute...but they are either super conservative, or they are very loose if you get my drift.:indiff:
 
And those girls can get very cute...but they are either super conservative, or they are very loose if you get my drift.:indiff:

Year ago a few buddies and I were going to an Army school in Virginia, we were all single. The school was four months long, so we were hooking up with local girls. A buddy of mine met this Turkish chick who was staying with another 12 Turkish girls, studying hotel management in the US. They were all Muslim, and they were all babes. Even the ugliest one was cute. Here they were without their fathers, brothers, uncles and cousins to watch over them, going wild in America, doing everything they shouldn't. Muslim girls gone wild. Yes, we all got hooked up, I could go in details but there are kids here on GTP. It was fun. :sly:
 
Well, as I wrote in another thread, in a multicultural society, there will always be tension between peoples mentality and thoughts, that is a fact. But, the important thing is to show respect and contribute to a better society for all people. You dont really have to accept another persons culture or religion, but you can respect them, that is the most important thing here. There are to much BS about racial and cultural tension, so people tend to forget the things that are really important. Christianity, judaism and islam can live in peace, and according to me they do. The only people that causing trouble is the radicals of any kind, and those people are only using the religion and racism to get allies.

Many societies fail to see that people living in them are different and have different thoughts. They want a society where all people are the same, but is that a good thing? The fact is that the societies are pluralistic, and they have been that for thousands of years. And that is also why im against those white supremacy groups that are very popular in europe aswell. On one side we have the islamic radicals, and on the other side we have the white supremacists, those people are the ones causing racial and religious tension.
 
All religions can live in peace.👍

But for some reason the followers of each religion can't, at least as a whole.👎

Religion is strange in that it is there to be a guide of social structure and overall harmony, but yet man still finds ways to bloody it and use it as a means to control others.

Which is why I say to many atheists I have great debates with that it is man, not religion, that is corrupt/can be corrupt. But that is a different topic.

Suffice to say, I'm more than pleased with the turn out this thread got.:)
 
Thank you for contributing!:)

Actually women are guaranteed more rights compared to the other two religions when Islam first came about. Now, it became a matter of uneducated men dictating the lives of women by twisting any quote from the Quran or Hadith (Prophet's thoughts on certain matters) to justify their treatment.

And I'm all for the separation of government from religion, especially in the modern world. But a lot of Muslim countries claim that they are indeed a theocracy, so Islam must be the basis of their government.

It truth, it is very hard, or maybe even impossible to get a true government without any religious intervention.

If the American government is secular, why swear the oath on a Bible? Or on any religious texts for that matter. If it were me, it should be law that oaths are to be sworn on the Constitution, because that's what the elected officials are supposed to uphold.

And those girls can get very cute...but they are either super conservative, or they are very loose if you get my drift.:indiff:

And that is my main issue with how those nations are - theocratic. In my opinion, theocracy and the modern world just do not work. And while the US does have a person swear in upon the Bible, that is mostly a hold over from the old Protestant ideals that helped create the nation. The difference is the US doesn't reference the Bible for handling legal matters.

Trying to completely deny something as culturally important as religion is very difficult, if not impossible. But they can be kept separate enough to allow a primarily secular approach to legal matters and government.

And as for the girls, I've found most religious girls that were raised in a conservative family tend to either stick to it or they just go insane once they get some freedom. And insane ones are kind of fun, if a bit unstable :sly:
 
Are most Muslims, the majority and the accepted norm of Muslim principles, allowing of relationships with other faiths or atheists then? So if I met a girl in the full kit where I can just see her eyes, I could without too much worry presume It would be ok to develop relations and her parents and relatives would be fine with that?
This would be in the UK i'm talking about, and in what way would you politely find out if there was a risk, hope that she tells you?
I know the UK does have honour killings.
This is not something I am about to do based on your advice so don't feel too responsible to give a view.
This might be a bit off subject as it's about Islam in UK not America.
 
Are most Muslims, the majority and the accepted norm of Muslim principles, allowing of relationships with other faiths or atheists then? So if I met a girl in the full kit where I can just see her eyes, I could without too much worry presume It would be ok to develop relations and her parents and relatives would be fine with that?
This would be in the UK i'm talking about, and in what way would you politely find out if there was a risk, hope that she tells you?
I know the UK does have honour killings.
This is not something I am about to do based on your advice so don't feel too responsible to give a view.
This might be a bit off subject as it's about Islam in UK not America.

Most people won't date too far from their faith because it is critical to who they are. A very Christian girl will rarely date an atheist because their views are so different, and similar with other faiths.

Non-practicing members of a faith don't really care as much, since they aren't actively following the guidelines. Honestly, I'd be very surprised if a girl that was strongly following any faith would date you, just because you'd not see eye to eye on a lot, and those issues extremely important to a person. Would be like the extremely liberal girl dating the intensely conservative guy in regard to political views.
 
Yeah but you can't control love. It would help I was good looking though.
But as has obviously happened through honour killings a mixed faith male and female will get together for whatever reason, and with such risk they get killed.
.....
I remember my Christian friend telling me, or me realising that he would only have a relationship with a Christian.
The concept of this confuses me, and I somehow see it as wrong. Or it makes me feel unhappy for someone to rule out so many nice potential people. I think what it is that I don't like is that he is judging people based on his and their beliefs rather than actually what they are as a person. I would accept his choice if he said he get's turned on sexually by Christian women, as in that case he is just following his nature, but I don't see that ever being true. Does love mean nothing at all if it is not backed up by shared religious belief? Again it confuses me because I don't have a faith, apart from Jedi, which I sometimes actually forget that I am, and it's a faith I have total control over by only believing in it when it suits me. How that for religious control lol.
Some people might say well that is not a faith. But there is no rules or laws for deciding that a faith is only a faith if it applies all the time of for over a certain amount of minutes per day and that you must remember you have it etc. That's another topic.
I'm also a follower of the Dude.
 
Honour killings and stuff like that occur, and are often done by people that are "muslim". But according to me, it hasnt anything to do with religion, it has to do with the persons own mentality and believes. I base my facts on how it is in northern europe, like sweden, denmark, norway, and UK of course. But killings, when a man kills a women for some BS thing, the non-muslims are overrepresentated I think. Once again, no people or religion is more/less violent than other. These people comiting honour killings, they could belive in any other religion there is, and it is there mentality that is the problem. Then if they use the quran to justify killings, then it is just wrong. Sure the holy books can be controversial some times, but you got to use your head and think in which context it is appropriate to take those "actions" that are stated in the books.

Even though the bible and quran helds information on how to deal with certain things, I think that you also can solve problems without referring to these holy books. That would for example be to solve problems like it is done in the certain society you live in, like using the countries laws etc. If you solve problems and make laws based on religious books, then you get a kind of theocratic society. That in turn would be problematic due to peoples different religious believes etc.
 
That is true, but if you get that affected by the media and think that all muslims are terrorists, than you have to educate yourself even more.

It is a paradox here, on one side the media shows islamic extremist activities in the middle east, and on the other side, in Europe specially sweden, the governments are letting the radical imams get to much attention in media, and show how "good" they are. Why is that? Why is that media always want to show these radical types?
Because bad news gets ratings. o_o

I've felt that the news outlets are, by and large, a kind of a self-perpetuating monster. They report bad news (because it draws viewers / readers), which sows negative feelings, which generates tension, which leads to more bad news.

I have to say, after reading this thread, I'm absolutely DELIGHTED with the GTP community. :D There's another gaming site I'm on, and the discussions on Islam are not NEARLY this civil or accepting by people outside the faith.

Seriously. This is a bright spot in the day for me. :) Cheers to my extended GTP family, and as-salaamu alaikum to the ummah here!
 
Because bad news gets ratings. o_o

I've felt that the news outlets are, by and large, a kind of a self-perpetuating monster. They report bad news (because it draws viewers / readers), which sows negative feelings, which generates tension, which leads to more bad news.

I have to say, after reading this thread, I'm absolutely DELIGHTED with the GTP community. :D There's another gaming site I'm on, and the discussions on Islam are not NEARLY this civil or accepting by people outside the faith.

Seriously. This is a bright spot in the day for me. :) Cheers to my extended GTP family, and as-salaamu alaikum to the ummah here!
Yes, that is indeed true. If you treat people with respect you get respect. The important thing is to show people you are using your intellect and think outside the box so to say. It is also important to speak about these things, and bring up the issues that exist. If we dont communicate and try to solve problems, whats left for mankind?

Thats why I often criticize those radical groups, because they arent communicating, they just talk BS and wants to make more tension.

It is also important that young people of different religions and race stand up and show the society that they arent bad people, and that they dont support these radical groups that exist. Unfortunately far too less people in my part of the world does that.
 
Most people won't date too far from their faith because it is critical to who they are. A very Christian girl will rarely date an atheist because their views are so different, and similar with other faiths.

There's truth to this but I think you have it backwards. A person of faith would happily be involved with some one without faith if they felt they could love them, they would hope to one day save their immortal sole and bring them on board, but regardless of this I'm sure they would rationalise it that if they had love in their heart for them then that is gods plan regardless of that person walking the path or not.

But it's typically the atheist who shy away from the faithful for several reasons, firstly if they are devout then they obviously aren't going to be quite as loose as a nice atheist/moderate girl/guy would be. Then there is the fact that they are always going to take issue with only being the second love in their life, with their religion being something they can't share or appreciate. And finally if you don't have belief it's quite hard to deeply respect someone who does in the way needed to have more than a superficial relationship. You fundamentally disagree with those beliefs and seeing someone who in your opinion is effectively believing in mythology as an equal is not easy and would eventually take it's toll on a relationship.
 
There's truth to this but I think you have it backwards. A person of faith would happily be involved with some one without faith if they felt they could love them, they would hope to one day save their immortal sole and bring them on board, but regardless of this I'm sure they would rationalise it that if they had love in their heart for them then that is gods plan regardless of that person walking the path or not.

But it's typically the atheist who shy away from the faithful for several reasons, firstly if they are devout then they obviously aren't going to be quite as loose as a nice atheist/moderate girl/guy would be. Then there is the fact that they are always going to take issue with only being the second love in their life, with their religion being something they can't share or appreciate. And finally if you don't have belief it's quite hard to deeply respect someone who does in the way needed to have more than a superficial relationship. You fundamentally disagree with those beliefs and seeing someone who in your opinion is effectively believing in mythology as an equal is not easy and would eventually take it's toll on a relationship.

Well, if you are sure and confident with your own religion, then you have no problem to love a girl with another belief. The reason people are a bit sceptic about inter-religious relasionships is that the partner maybe dont accept your belief, or if you get children, which religion will they have? Also if you planning to live togeather, it can be problems due to your different religious customs, believes etc. Also, if your partnes doesnt share the same understanding and religion as you, he or she will never be able to discuss and understand things related to your faith.

A religious practicing muslim, and a religious practicing christian would encounter problems if they get kids, because booth want the kid to have "their" religion. Which religion should the kid have?

Personly I would rather marry a girl with no religion at all, or a girl that is non practicing, because in that case, it wouldnt be any conflicts regarding which religion our kid would have. As a man, I would take statement in this case :cool:
 
There's truth to this but I think you have it backwards. A person of faith would happily be involved with some one without faith if they felt they could love them, they would hope to one day save their immortal sole and bring them on board, but regardless of this I'm sure they would rationalise it that if they had love in their heart for them then that is gods plan regardless of that person walking the path or not.

No, it goes both ways. I've seen it go both ways. I've known plenty of religious girls that won't date outside of their beliefs too much because they don't want to deal with some of the pressures (sex) and just don't want to waste time trying to change someone when there is no assurance.
 
Honour killings are not allowed by any of the Abrahamic religions. It's usually the mentality of the people who commit them.

As for secularism, it doesn't really work out too well in countries where most of the population want religion infused into their everyday politics.

Eg: In our country, the large majority of the population see flogging as a perfectly acceptable punishment for certain crimes, although Human Rights groups would be grilling our government for this.

This :gtpflag: Forum is a much needed break from MSNBC or Youtube comment-lines:crazy:
 
Honour killings are not allowed by any of the Abrahamic religions. It's usually the mentality of the people who commit them.

As for secularism, it doesn't really work out too well in countries where most of the population want religion infused into their everyday politics.

Eg: In our country, the large majority of the population see flogging as a perfectly acceptable punishment for certain crimes, although Human Rights groups would be grilling our government for this.

This :gtpflag: Forum is a much needed break from MSNBC or Youtube comment-lines:crazy:
Well, then it is time to maybe change the mentality, because having a society where religion is implemented in politics and laws can be frustratring, because all people in a society doesnt share the same believes. Then, another question is why many countries that was "modern" in the 60 and 80 have become much more radical and much more influenced by religion etc? Look at Iran for example, no one can deny that under the time of the Shan, they werent that radical in their islamic interpretation as they are now, and pakistand the same. What we can se, is that countries that wasnt radical before, are becoming radical now. Does the people really know the consequences of having religious believes implemented in the politics? Or a better question, do they know the consequences of having such laws and then say it is due to their religion they do certain things? Islamic laws according to me are made by men, specially the sharia laws, that differ from country to country. It seems everyone can get away with anything aslong as they say "it is due" to their religion. Why do you think people in the west often think muslims are radical and violent? Well thats because of media, and once again the muslim leaders that shows their radical thoughts. You pointed out an intresting thing, and that is "In our country, the large majority of the population see flogging as a perfectly acceptable punishment for certain crimes", and that is the problem, especialy in countries where muslim immigrants live, like Sweden. There are far to less people that stands up and show that they are against these radical thinking, and on the other hand they are complaining that people accusing them for radical thinking etc. Do you see the paradox here?

In Sweden there is an ongoing debate whether people can use burqas at work, in school etc, or not. Some clame that burqa isnt something that has to do with sweden, due to sweden beeing a christian country, and some people say it is due to their religion and interpretation of the quran they dress in a certain matter. But the important question is, what do these people gain in dressing like that in a western country, that allready is hostile against non fair people? Swedish people are indeed racists when they see people dress in a unwestern way, and not to speak how difficult it is to be accepted if you are different. If you live in a western country, like it or not you have to adapt to certain things, otherwise you will be the one taking great loss. People that came to sweden from forreign countries in the 60 and 70s, they adapted to the western society, and still they didnt forget their religion and culture. People coming to sweden nowdays, they dont adapt to the western society in such extent that they will benifit from it. In fact, many people that come to sweden are at a beggining some how open minded, but after some years, many of them have becomed radicals, that according to them selves just practice islam as it "should" be, which is wearing burqa, speak loud in arabic in public, want respect from others just because they are "muslim" etc, etc. Why is that? Well it is because they have come in contact with these local muslim leaders and people around that has this mentality.
 
The Shah of Iran was a secularist, which contributed to his growing unpopularity and the subsequent revolution in 1979.

Many Islamic countries, including ours have strict anti-terrorism/radicalist laws, which can control radicalism to some extent.

Our constitution doesn't define Sharia as it's main source, and much of it is based on Common law. However, it states that anything not explicitely forbidden by Sharia is allowed, and there are some additions to the common law to accomodate Islamic customs.

You have a point regarding what you say about Muslims immigrants in other countries. It would be ironic to wear a veil in Western countries, because it simply makes you more conspicuous. I fully agree with your point that immigrants in Western countries should not, and cannot demand everything they need. If I were an immigrant, I would accept the values of the country I live in.

Basically, we need to learn more about each other and to accept our differences. It's not a planet for any specific group.
 
... Very few people are familiar with the history of either, and are completely unaware that Islam was historically more tolerant towards other faiths than Catholicism...

I don't want to get into this debate, but quite a few people from India and Southern Asia in general will argue against this.

Just google Tamerlane, Aurangzeb, Ghazni, Ghauri etc. Quite a few more.

If my Medieval European History is correct, the moors in Spain were relatively more tolerant than their Middle Eastern counterparts. But then they were in the minority in Spain.

Question is, how do you handle being the majority? And how do you handle being a minority?

Peace.
 
I don't want to get into this debate, but quite a few people from India and Southern Asia in general will argue against this.

Just google Tamerlane, Aurangzeb, Ghazni, Ghauri etc. Quite a few more.

If my Medieval European History is correct, the moors in Spain were relatively more tolerant than their Middle Eastern counterparts. But then they were in the minority in Spain.

Question is, how do you handle being the majority? And how do you handle being a minority?

Peace.
The question is aslo how reliable these western sources are on oriental history? It is no lie that west often wants to make people from the east more crule than they really were. Remember, history written by white man, is in favour of the white man. Many emperors maybe took taxes out of citizens, but it is foolish to say that they didnt contribute to something good. The reason why non muslims paid tax, was the fact that muslims expected to pay zakat (a kind of gift you give to the poor, etc, etc). Especialy in india, I think that booth muslims and hindus came along quite good some times, and there were many hindus that converted to islam because they were treated like equals. We must also remember that while some people was forced to convert to islam, many people converted out of free will. I also think that the implementation of Islam in india differs from other parts of the world, because indians already had a religion that was world known and was as big as the christianity and judaism. Muslim preachers or imams, or what ever thay are called often spread islam in that way that they showed the people similarities between islam and hinduism, and that made a religious tolerance between hindus and muslims.

We must also differ between people that were non violent muslims, and conquerors that were violent, and also were muslims. All conquerors around that time used religion in one case or another to get control, and that was even the case under Muhammeds time in arabia. Some people converted, just because they could benifit from beeing muslim, not only in spiritual way, but in material way. We cant deny that the caliphs and other people that "took" over the authority after Muhammeds time used religion to gain power. But so did the christian emperors aswell.

Beeing a majority or minority can be hard so to say. And the problem is that people dont want to be minorities because they are less safe. Thats why you often see minority groups stick togeather and become rather radical because they want to get respect and recognition amongst the others. If everyone would see people as individuals, then the minority/majority issue wouldnt be a problem right? Even though you are a part of a certain minority group, that doesnt mean that you share the values and mentality of that certain group, hence there are sub group. So majority/minority will always exist aslong as people doesnt think and act in the same way, but it hasnt got to be a problem though.

I dont really know if the religious tolerance during the moores period in spain had anything to do with them beeing the minority. The fact is that there were many different caliphs ruling in the medievel times, and the caliphs interpreted islam in a slightly different way, and that is why we can see differances between islamic rulership around the world. The fact is that there were booth sunni muslims ruling and interpreted islam after there point of view, and there were minority shias that interpreted islamic leadership in there point of view. This is important to understand, so one can see that all muslims arent all alike. Unfortiunatly far to many people think of muslims as a homogeneous group, but that isnt true.
 
Well, then it is time to maybe change the mentality, because having a society where religion is implemented in politics and laws can be frustratring, because all people in a society doesnt share the same believes. Then, another question is why many countries that was "modern" in the 60 and 80 have become much more radical and much more influenced by religion etc? Look at Iran for example, no one can deny that under the time of the Shan, they werent that radical in their islamic interpretation as they are now, and pakistand the same. What we can se, is that countries that wasnt radical before, are becoming radical now. Does the people really know the consequences of having religious believes implemented in the politics? Or a better question, do they know the consequences of having such laws and then say it is due to their religion they do certain things? Islamic laws according to me are made by men, specially the sharia laws, that differ from country to country. It seems everyone can get away with anything aslong as they say "it is due" to their religion. Why do you think people in the west often think muslims are radical and violent? Well thats because of media, and once again the muslim leaders that shows their radical thoughts. You pointed out an intresting thing, and that is "In our country, the large majority of the population see flogging as a perfectly acceptable punishment for certain crimes", and that is the problem, especialy in countries where muslim immigrants live, like Sweden. There are far to less people that stands up and show that they are against these radical thinking, and on the other hand they are complaining that people accusing them for radical thinking etc. Do you see the paradox here?

In Sweden there is an ongoing debate whether people can use burqas at work, in school etc, or not. Some clame that burqa isnt something that has to do with sweden, due to sweden beeing a christian country, and some people say it is due to their religion and interpretation of the quran they dress in a certain matter. But the important question is, what do these people gain in dressing like that in a western country, that allready is hostile against non fair people? Swedish people are indeed racists when they see people dress in a unwestern way, and not to speak how difficult it is to be accepted if you are different. If you live in a western country, like it or not you have to adapt to certain things, otherwise you will be the one taking great loss. People that came to sweden from forreign countries in the 60 and 70s, they adapted to the western society, and still they didnt forget their religion and culture. People coming to sweden nowdays, they dont adapt to the western society in such extent that they will benifit from it. In fact, many people that come to sweden are at a beggining some how open minded, but after some years, many of them have becomed radicals, that according to them selves just practice islam as it "should" be, which is wearing burqa, speak loud in arabic in public, want respect from others just because they are "muslim" etc, etc. Why is that? Well it is because they have come in contact with these local muslim leaders and people around that has this mentality.

The burqa is another difficult and confusing subject that Muslims as a whole just don't get. On the right, you have extremist saying the burqa must be displayed at all times, but on the left you have those saying burqa is not required commitment.

Originally, the burqa, including the full face cover, was worn by the Prophet's wives for reasons that even I don't understand. It's not written out right that the woman's face has to be covered, that's a Wahhabi interpretation on the matter.

In the modern world, a burqa that just cover the hair isn't/shouldn't really be a issue. It's the face veil that I find issue with.

To people who aren't Muslim, and don't know much about Islam and Muslims in general, can see the face veil as a mark of arrogance, and possibly contempt to other non-muslims, that they are below them by not allowing them to look at their face.

Besides, even I find it a little creepy when a woman with the full burka stares at me. (They look like ninjas...Is that why people are suspicious of fully clad burqa women?):crazy:
 
Because bad news gets ratings. o_o

I've felt that the news outlets are, by and large, a kind of a self-perpetuating monster. They report bad news (because it draws viewers / readers), which sows negative feelings, which generates tension, which leads to more bad news.

I have to say, after reading this thread, I'm absolutely DELIGHTED with the GTP community. :D There's another gaming site I'm on, and the discussions on Islam are not NEARLY this civil or accepting by people outside the faith.

Seriously. This is a bright spot in the day for me. :) Cheers to my extended GTP family, and as-salaamu alaikum to the ummah here!

Walaikum salaam!

And GTP is by far the best online forum on the interwebz.👍

If I put this thread up on a different forum, let's say on gamespot's forums, this thread wouldn't have been as civilized and filled with actual educated posts. A flame war would have broken out no doubt.:yuck:
 
I recall a time when I was helping out at a charity function for deaf children (I am profoundly deaf myself and use cochlea implants to hear as well as any person). This occasion, I was looking after young creche-age children while the parents were in a meeting to learn and understand how best to understand deafness and so on with their children.

One of the parents was quite strict with her Islam upbringing, which did not bother me the slightest, as I was in Leicester at the time (multicultural environment). The only slight problem I had was actually trying to have some form of conversation with the mother with the veil, as I still rely on lip-reading to understand what is being said at that moment in time, especially when I first meet someone.

I wouldn't call having a veil as a sign of "arrogance" (don't know where you got that from, sumbrownkid), I would just term it as a sign that they are quite devout with their religion and to be respected of their beliefs, like you would do for any other people. It is just that they are easier to see in the street and anywhere else in a Westernised civilisation.
 
I wouldn't call having a veil as a sign of "arrogance" (don't know where you got that from, sumbrownkid), I would just term it as a sign that they are quite devout with their religion and to be respected of their beliefs, like you would do for any other people. It is just that they are easier to see in the street and anywhere else in a Westernised civilisation.

What he meant was that people in west maybe see the veil etc as an arrogance because the fact is that we are living in a western country, where you have to adapts to westens things to get along. And the other thing, wearing a burqa doesnt show you anything about your belief, and that is the problem. If you automaticly believe that burqa is something muslim, and a burqa is compulsory, then you end up like in sweden where some muslims criticize others for not having burqa and call them non-believers. Many ,muslims play the so called "race card" when somone discuss about the burqa, but that again isnt the issue. As I stated before you have to adapt to some western things to not take a great loss, and as far as I know, wearing a burqa is something that both non-muslims and muslims find strange sometimes in a western society.

If people start to believe that certain things are straight up islamic and quranic, then people can do almost everything and then justify it with their religion, and that is what happening in some western countries. You must also be in mind that there arent a single interpratation of the quran and muslim traditions, but there are many. If we play with the mind and say that muslim men that has beard and "traditional" clothes, does that mean they are religious? I dont see any conection between ones clothes and how devote they are to their religion. The multicultural society look at this from the wrong angle, and that is because their sources to islamic information can be questionable some times.
 
Not a sign of arrogance I don't think, In the west we are concerned it is criminal abuse not a characteristic we don't like. A point of law to consider, and already a law in France banning the face covering veils.
People from other cultures and countries can do whatever they like in the West/Europe/UK even if it is counter to the local traditions. But unlawful things are not tolerated, abuse is unlawful. And a full face veil linked to a strict religious code can be considered abuse and therefore illegal behaviour/rules.
But I think that people should be able to wear what ever they want. I think the existence of rules which dictate clothing without choice are unlawful and they should be banned (if those rules are judged to possibly give a negative quality of life or oppression to the vulnerable). But that wouldn't achieve much, as it would just get ignored. How to police it I don't know. How to protect women that are Muslim but don't want to wear any veil or even cover their hair?
My solution to help children born and raised in the host country:
I think that in the school curriculum there should be lessons to the young kids from age 6 upwards, that religion is an optional life choice, and no matter what your parents or your family may say or wish upon you, the choice is yours you are free to choose any way to live your life, and even if you choose your parents religion, you can choose what parts of it you like, and what bits you don't want to follow or conform to.

.....
I also wanted to say this is a good discussion, on a big subject. And obviously there are differing views which can be expressed and concerns raised. It's good to see the helpful exchange of information. My concerns might seem negative, but that's just dealing with the issues that exist.
 
Last edited:
Peter King's recent debacle on Muslim Radicalization senate hearings is hopefully a turning point for the better.

This hearing reeked of Senator McCarthy's hearings on possible Communists and sympathizers.

It's things like these that only deepen the wedge between Muslims and the rest of America.

But at the end, is this Peter King playing out his somewhat subdued bigotry at the expense of the American taxpayer?

Or is he merely pandering to the demographic he wants to win?
 
Here is a fascinating lecture on the commercial heritage of Islam.

[youtubehd]bzUYVYOyALc[/youtubehd]

These kinds of lectures are like bug spray to Islamophobes.
 
^Very informative post Omnis.

A lot of people, especially many Muslims I know myself, tend to forget that the Prophet's first wife was a very successful business woman.
 
Back