Islam - What's your view on it?

  • Thread starter SalmanBH
  • 5,929 comments
  • 262,709 views
I wonder if would be possible to undermine the third Reich's swastika appropriation by just using swastikas everywhere.

Gucci bag: Swastikas
Hello kitty backpacks: Swastikas
Master plan for new urban parks: Swastikas
Bakeries: Swastika-shaped cupcakes
New tech company logo: Swastikas

I feel like it would definitely diffuse the swastika's capacity to intimidate/shock people and take away a white supremacist tool. Kind of like how the F word has lost all semblance of seriousness in the past 15 years.
 
HenrySwanson
Forced abortions and forced contraceptive insertion in China:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...abortions-sexual-abuse-genocide-a9144721.html

Is it time to recognise this as a genocide (and if so, what can we do)?
Click to expand...

No, it is not time to do that, since these are only stories, anecdotes, based on personal experience.
@PocketZeven has reminded up that this is not acceptable as evidence.

PocketZeven
It is complicated, but most of these accusation come from whistleblowers. From my experience whistleblowers are not always reliable without real evidence. I dont count anecdotal expriences as evidence. Personally I would like to find out more about these camps, if they are as cruel as they are?

A few years ago I saw this docu about camps that treats gamingaddiction among the youth in China. A lot of the patients there seem to exaggerate their experience as cruel and violation of their rights. Although not comparable, I just want to point out the unreliable narrator again. That said they could have heavily edited or directed the material in the docu.

I was not referring to military or legal pressure. Boycots of chinese goods could be a good tool to pressure China.
Click to expand...
 
PocketZeven
My experience with uighurs in China is totally different. Without decent research and due diligence one should not point the finger too early. Dont get me wrong, if true there should be action taken.
Click to expand...
Did you go to Xinjiang?

Because that is where everything is happening, I don't see why they would care outside that region as they don't make up a large percentage of people anywhere else.
 
PocketZeven
My experience with uighurs in China is totally different.
Click to expand...

Anecdotal, but my sister was very good friends with a Uighur lad when she lived in China, they fell in love blah blah and she went to meet his family. After she left China (he couldn't, as a Uighur he wasn't allowed a passport) she kept in touch with him and his family until about 18 months ago when all return contact stopped. She doesn't know why all of the ten-or-so family members have gone quiet but she fears the worst.
 
mustafur
Did you go to Xinjiang?

Because that is where everything is happening, I don't see why they would care outside that region as they don't make up a large percentage of people anywhere else.
Click to expand...

I have, but back in 2001. Urumqi

HenrySwanson
Can you expand on this?
Click to expand...

In my time living in beijing I had many uighur friends. They is definately discrimination in the vane of them being poor and thieves, similar how some minorities are viewed in the west. But I met rich ones, students and working people. But like I said, perhaps it was a different time.
 
PocketZeven
I have, but back in 2001. Urumqi



In my time living in beijing I had many uighur friends. They is definately discrimination in the vane of them being poor and thieves, similar how some minorities are viewed in the west. But I met rich ones, students and working people. But like I said, perhaps it was a different time.
Click to expand...
Hmmm I don't know if that cancels out, or rather makes me doubt the accusations.
 
Dobermann92
"Religion of peace" strikes again:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...entenced-death-blasphemy-191221091139428.html
Click to expand...

This has more to day with culture then religion.

If uneducated/uncivil people in christian countries were to take the bible litterally it wouldnt change that much:
"Whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death."

Leviticus 24:16

edit: added more specific description
 
Last edited:
Dennisch
It's more cultural than religion, proceeds by quoting religious text as example.
Click to expand...

:banghead:
You misunderstood context. Doberman92 suggested that Islam is not a peacefull religion. I posted a bible quote to emphasize that the bible is just as violent as Islam. My conclusion is that its the people and their culture, not the religion you should point the finger to. Or better yet all religion in general.
 
PocketZeven
:banghead:
You misunderstood context. Doberman92 suggested that Islam is not a peacefull religion. I posted a bible quote to emphasize that the bible is just as violent as Islam. My conclusion is that its the people and their culture, not the religion you should point the finger to. Or better yet all religion in general.
Click to expand...

But culture there is dictated by religion. They didn't "choose" that culture, they are brainwashed by their parents by forcing them on religious dogma. In the west on the other hand the culture isn't changed, the people changed because of new philosophycal ideas. You could find a Bible literalist who would murder you for being an atheist if he had the power for sure, but they aren't in power and secular laws have some retentiveness. Mashing religion and laws together makes a bad system.
 
Dobermann92
But culture there is dictated by religion. They didn't "choose" that culture, they are brainwashed by their parents by forcing them on religious dogma. In the west on the other hand the culture isn't changed, the people changed because of new philosophycal ideas. You could find a Bible literalist who would murder you for being an atheist if he had the power for sure, but they aren't in power and secular laws have some retentiveness. Mashing religion and laws together makes a bad system.
Click to expand...

I think you underestimate how pervasive Christian morality still is with regards to "western" law.
 
Imari
I think you underestimate how pervasive Christian morality still is with regards to "western" law.
Click to expand...
It's not for want of trying either.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-press-for-death-penalty-for-homosexual-acts

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ti-gay-conservative-evangelicals-9193593.html

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scott_Lively


That's not forgetting that a lot of the anti-homosexuality laws in former European colonies are a hold over from European laws.
 
Last edited:
Dobermann92
But culture there is dictated by religion. They didn't "choose" that culture, they are brainwashed by their parents by forcing them on religious dogma. In the west on the other hand the culture isn't changed, the people changed because of new philosophycal ideas. You could find a Bible literalist who would murder you for being an atheist if he had the power for sure, but they aren't in power and secular laws have some retentiveness. Mashing religion and laws together makes a bad system.
Click to expand...

That what I was pointing out. I dont agree with the suggestion that islam is the cause of violence.
 
Imari
I think you underestimate how pervasive Christian morality still is with regards to "western" law.
Click to expand...

Morality has nothing to do with Christianity or Islam. We are moral beings despite some of us being religious.

PocketZeven
That what I was pointing out. I dont agree with the suggestion that islam is the cause of violence.
Click to expand...

If the culture is predominantly dictated by Islam, then it is, even if this means an indirect cause.
 
A Times investigation has found evidence of rampant radicalisation in UK jails:

Islamist extremists hold Sharia trials and groom young Muslims in British prisons

It also highlights the over-representation of Muslims in UK jails - Muslims make up 15% of the prison population yet are only 4.8% of the general population.

One article suggests that this is the fault of....you guessed it, Britain:
https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...a-rehabilitation-discrimination-a7937746.html

But that would mean these same biases are found in America (9% prison pop, 0.8% general) and France (40-50% prison pop estimate, 12% general) among others....

Personally I think conversion inside prisons accounts for a substantial amount (Buddhism for example is over-represented too) but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be time for difficult questions to be asked
 
Last edited:
Dobermann92
We are moral beings despite some of us being religious.
Click to expand...
Except those whose actions have been deemed immoral by those who would have them bend to beliefs they may not possess, particularly if the actions that have been deemed immoral aren't so in their own minds. "Christian morality" is so pervasive that it shapes laws and and strips groups of basic rights, and it is wielded as a weapon against others rather than a guideline for one's own actions.

It's abundantly clear that you don't like Islam, but to don blinders when it is shown to you that Islam is not unique in the impact that you consider undesirable is pure ignorance.
 
The Taliban in Afghanistan are in a very robust position to consolidate power, and ISIS are rapidly reconstituting in Iraq. These are some of the most fervent and highly persistent military organizations in the world today. The US, lacking any known reason to keep taking losses with zero prospect of victory, is backing away from the fight. Our cause, however just or moral, appears tattered and lost. Blowback to the US and Europe in the form of terrorism and floods of refugees from violence and privation is a salutary lesson of faux pas in the Great Game we play. We have greatly underestimated the character and motivation of the indigenous peoples we sought to liberate - or maybe dominate.
 
TexRex
Except those whose actions have been deemed immoral by those who would have them bend to beliefs they may not possess, particularly if the actions that have been deemed immoral aren't so in their own minds. "Christian morality" is so pervasive that it shapes laws and and strips groups of basic rights, and it is wielded as a weapon against others rather than a guideline for one's own actions.

It's abundantly clear that you don't like Islam, but to don blinders when it is shown to you that Islam is not unique in the impact that you consider undesirable is pure ignorance.
Click to expand...

Christians use law to strip other people of basic rights and persecute them. How this fact makes the believers of Islam any less problematic?
You could always point me to that christianity does the same thing, which is true, but still irrelevant, because this topic is called Islam, what's your view on it, even if we agree that christianity is the worst religion of all time in the present (maybe, the recent death toll suggest otherwise), it wouldn't change a damn thing.
 
Last edited:
Dobermann92
Christians use law to strip other people of basic rights and persecute them. How this fact makes the believers of Islam any less problematic?
You could always point me to that christianity does the same thing, which is true, but still irrelevant, because this topic is called Islam, what's your view on it, even if we agree that christianity is the worst religion of all time in the present (maybe, the recent death toll suggest otherwise), it wouldn't change a damn thing.
Click to expand...
It's more about applying the same standard to all faiths, something that is not often done.

As an example you talk about death toll, yet both sides have people who believe (as an example) that Afghanistan was a holy war (both Bush and Blair used God as justification), both sides had people on the ground who were doing it for God and country and both sides had people who fought because it was a job.

In every major faith on the planet you have those who use their faith for good and those who use their faith for bad, to label any faith utterly good or bad is simplistic to the point of removing any sound logic from the position.
 
Scaff
It's more about applying the same standard to all faiths, something that is not often done.

As an example you talk about death toll, yet both sides have people who believe (as an example) that Afghanistan was a holy war (both Bush and Blair used God as justification), both sides had people on the ground who were doing it for God and country and both sides had people who fought because it was a job.

In every major faith on the planet you have those who use their faith for good and those who use their faith for bad, to label any faith utterly good or bad is simplistic to the point of removing any sound logic from the position.
Click to expand...

All religions are bad, man made creations and the world would be better without any of them. They promote superstition which you cannot question, believers use God as an argument, they want to have power on you. I just pointing out which one is currently the most dangerous belief system when it comes to power (in Europe and in the Middle-East especially, I know that in the southern States protestants have way much power). Faith is nothing without it's teachings, faith is illogical, the definition of it is: strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof. "People do good things regardless of faith or religion, they do bad things because of religion" - just to quote Aron Ra, a prominent youtube atheist.
 
Dobermann92
All religions are bad, man made creations and the world would be better without any of them. They promote superstition which you cannot question, believers use God as an argument, they want to have power on you. I just pointing out which one is currently the most dangerous belief system when it comes to power (in Europe and in the Middle-East especially, I know that in the southern States protestants have way much power). Faith is nothing without it's teachings, faith is illogical, the definition of it is: strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof. "People do good things regardless of faith or religion, they do bad things because of religion" - just to quote Aron Ra, a prominent youtube atheist.
Click to expand...
You assert that Islam is to blame for heinous acts, but that's just daft. Every single person of the Islamic faith who does not commit heinous acts is reason to question this assertion, for if they commit no such acts in the name of Islam, the blame must be placed elsewhere.

Every single father who kills their child would not have committed this particular act--with this particular victim--if they weren't the child's father. It's impossible. So the logical conclusion is that fatherhood is the problem, no?

I say to you that individuals are the problem. Catholicism isn't to blame for priests who diddle little boys in the rectory and Christianity isn't to blame for people who murder doctors and nurses who aid in the termination of pregnancy when a woman chooses this.

Even "look over here at all the violence in an area where Islam is the primary religion" is the result of individuals permitting, or even mandating, heinous acts committed in the name of Islam.

Without individuals willing to commit heinous acts, religion does not accomplish this. Religion isn't to blame for individuals who would maim, molest and murder in the name of religion.
 
Dobermann92
All religions are bad, man made creations and the world would be better without any of them. They promote superstition which you cannot question, believers use God as an argument, they want to have power on you. I just pointing out which one is currently the most dangerous belief system when it comes to power (in Europe and in the Middle-East especially, I know that in the southern States protestants have way much power). Faith is nothing without it's teachings, faith is illogical, the definition of it is: strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof. "People do good things regardless of faith or religion, they do bad things because of religion" - just to quote Aron Ra, a prominent youtube atheist.
Click to expand...
Once again double standards come into play here.

First what defines a religious army and what defines killing in the name of that, does being a member of an army who swear allegence to the religious head of a state apply? What if the individual doesn't share that exact belief?

What about those that gave displaced millions of people, killed tens of thousands and tortured and maimed those that don't convert? As that's happened twice in the last few decades and the people doing it in both cases were not Muslim.
 
Last edited:
TexRex
Without individuals willing to commit heinous acts, religion does not accomplish this. Religion isn't to blame for individuals who would maim, molest and murder in the name of religion.
Click to expand...

TexRex
Except those whose actions have been deemed immoral by those who would have them bend to beliefs they may not possess
Click to expand...


So when Pakistani academic is sentenced to death for blasphemy it's ok because individuals in Pakistan want it that way and any suggestion that it's wrong is cultural imperialism? Or what is your position on this?
 

Similar threads

Chrisssss
What's your go-to car?
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
Force-Feedback
Force-Feedback
CTznOfTime
  • Poll
Your Racing Cam/View with PSVR2
Replies
20
Views
4K
todally_lit
todally_lit
I
Project cars three stuck in rear view
Replies
3
Views
1K
IfAndOr
IfAndOr
Nakean
gt7 VR2 time split view
Replies
11
Views
5K
sonnyboychris
sonnyboychris
ploopsy
Centered cockpit view idea
Replies
10
Views
3K
stonelejo
S

Latest Posts

Back