Jaguar Reveals Rebrand for its EV Future (😬)

  • Thread starter Famine
  • 303 comments
  • 14,787 views
Oh, stop. You've thrown your 2 cents into this conversation on multiple posts. You even tried to make a joke relating to it.

That’s before I knew it was going to be a carry on for four bloody days.

I’ve unfollowed the thread now anyway, so carry on all you like. I’ll get my auto news elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
You're calling me a conservative? Ha! I don't follow any religion, I do not object to gay marriage and I'm not against immigration.
a duck: "Look, just because I waddle and quack..."
that's drag queen story time which is to do with CHILDREN who should not be exposed to it.
Because they’re too young to understand it.
That's the [social] conservative position.

At what age are they no longer too young to understand it? Why that age? Why does their supposed inability to understand mean they shouldn't be exposed to it? What's the harm whether they understand it or not? What is it to you where parents take their children? You get that it's voluntary, right? Why do you have to be such a puss?

By putting people in strange outfits, giving them unusual haircuts and not making it clear which gender they are.
Surprised Oh My GIF

What advertising material did they place her in? On Wikipedia it says that they sponsored one of her videos on Instagram, so it would be more accurate to say that they placed Bud Light in Dylan’s feed, trying to reach her audience.
One video is enough to alienate an entire group of customers.
It may or may not be, but what happened doesn't demonstrate as much. I only know who Dylan Mulvaney is because of the collective connie bitchfit stoked by a connie media ecosystem that tells pathetic midwits what are incapable of independent thought when and at what they should be outraged. The sponsored video alone didn't do squat.
Conservatives are not slowflakes, they just don't resonate with the marketing.
lol
They throw a bitchfit because it's a betrayal!
lmao

Paola Bracho Gasp GIF by MOODMAN
 
At what point will these clearly emotionally overactive folks stop and ask themselves "Are these even my feelings or are these what I was told to feel? Why do I really feel like this?" Of course I expect the responses from said folks to as usual be overreactive because Self Reflection is completely discouraged, but its seriously just mind-boggling.

And again, this ad is at best a daft misfire. Lets leave out the idiotic political BS and study the Ad itself.
 
Last edited:
At what point will these clearly emotionally overactive folks stop and ask themselves "Are these even my feelings or are these what I was told to feel? Why do I really feel like this?" Of course I expect the responses from said folks to as usual be overreactive because Self Reflection is completely discouraged, but its seriously just mind-boggling.

And again, this ad is at best a daft misfire. Lets leave out the idiotic political BS and study the Ad itself.
Oh, no, they lack the cognitive capacity for introspection.
 
That's the [social] conservative position.

At what age are they no longer too young to understand it? Why that age? Why does their supposed inability to understand mean they shouldn't be exposed to it? What's the harm whether they understand it or not? What is it to you where parents take their children? You get that it's voluntary, right? Why do you have to be such a puss?
OK you want to play the game, I'll play.

If you ask me, children should only begin to learn about transgender people when they're 13. At that age, kids are starting to go through puberty and they are most likely going to start having sexual desires. Whether you like to believe it or not, most of these kids will end up becoming one of two genders: male or female. Only a handful will ever feel the need to "transition" so trying to normalise this sort of thing before the age of 10 is dangerous. Having "drag queen story time" and beating these kids over the head with some stupid ideology is not going to stop any sort of animosity. Why put the focus on such a rare thing when you could just simply say that a small portion of people will end up becoming trans in sex ed? A lot of these lefties don't believe in gender and want to homogenise everything to the point where no one is different or individual.
It may or may not be, but what happened doesn't demonstrate as much. I only know who Dylan Mulvaney is because of the collective connie bitchfit stoked by a connie media ecosystem that tells pathetic midwits what are incapable of independent thought when and at what they should be outraged. The sponsored video alone didn't do squat.
So you're saying that lefties don't also do this? What makes you think that you're soo superior?
 
Last edited:
Man who presents as cat still believing Jaguar advert is trying to turn people into transvestites. More at nine.
If you ask me, children should only begin to learn about transgender people when they're 13. At that age, kids are starting to go through puberty and they are most likely going to start having sexual desires.
What does sexuality have to do with gender?

Teaching kids about sex, sexuality, and gender only when they're "starting to go through puberty" (without looking it up, tell me what the first stage of puberty is and when it starts; I'll help - it begins with an "A", and it isn't 13) is far, far, far too late. It also denies reality - some kids may have gay parents, so refusing to answer why they have two daddies/mummies until they get hair down there is moronic - and is a straight-up nonces' charter. Kids need to know what and where so they know that it's wrong when their priest/scoutmaster tries to touch them on it (or to touch his). Wanting them to be ignorant of it is wanting them to be taken advantage of by predators.


Anyway, this latest entry in The Adventures of @ScottPuss20 has Turd-Tier Take Which is Later Walked Back Upon Presentation of Actual Information belongs here:

 
What does sexuality have to do with gender?
You wanna know why "genders" were created? To acknowledge the biological differences between men and women. It has everything to do with sexuality.
Teaching kids about sex, sexuality, and gender only when they're "starting to go through puberty" (without looking it up, tell me what the first stage of puberty is and when it starts; I'll help - it begins with an "A", and it isn't 13) is far, far, far too late. It also denies reality - some kids may have gay parents, so refusing to answer why they have two daddies/mummies until they get hair down there is moronic - and is a straight-up nonces' charter. Kids need to know what and where so they know that it's wrong when their priest/scoutmaster tries to touch them on it (or to touch his). Wanting them to be ignorant of it is wanting them to be taken advantage of by predators.
So you're saying that all gay parents are trans? What?
 
You wanna know why "genders" were created?
Given your handle on reality, not from you, no.
So you're saying that all gay parents are trans? What?
As a general rule, "So you're saying that..." usual precedes a radical misunderstanding of what's been quoted and a rewording. As it is here too.

Did you miss the last part of my post, or just want to ignore it?
 
Last edited:
@ScottPuss20 You should probably turn off the setting in your brain that hyperfocuses on anything about people with the trans prefix.

Unless of course you're transphobic, which I sincerely hope isn't the case.
 
Last edited:
Given your handle on reality, not from you, no.
I think I'm a bit better versed in the "reality" than you.
As a general rule, "So you're saying that..." usual precedes a radical misunderstanding of what's been quoted and a rewording. As it is here too.

Did you miss the last part of my post, or just want to ignore it?
I did not ignore the last part of your post. I just don't understand it.
 
I think I'm a bit better versed in the "reality" than you.
Given the number of times I've had to present actual fact to you and you've subsequently walked back an absolutely rancid take on reality, that seems unlikely.
I did not ignore the last part of your post. I just don't understand it.
And then carried on as if it didn't exist - ergo ignoring it.

Talk about issues arising from your catastrophic misunderstanding of the transgender topic in the thread literally made for it and not the one about Jaguar's rebranding attempts. This is not a request.
 
OK you want to play the game, I'll play.

If you ask me, children should only begin to learn about transgender people when they're 13. At that age, kids are starting to go through puberty and they are most likely going to start having sexual desires. Whether you like to believe it or not, most of these kids will end up becoming one of two genders: male or female. Only a handful will ever feel the need to "transition" so trying to normalise this sort of thing before the age of 10 is dangerous. Having "drag queen story time" and beating these kids over the head with some stupid ideology is not going to stop any sort of animosity. Why put the focus on such a rare thing when you could just simply say that a small portion of people will end up becoming trans in sex ed? A lot of these lefties don't believe in gender and want to homogenise everything to the point where no one is different or individual.
Counterpoint: Drag Queen Story Hour is for entertainment, has nothing to do with gender ideology, and doesn't represent legitimate harm either way.

Conservative is when you cry like a little bitch about things that don't matter.

So you're saying that lefties don't also do this? What makes you think that you're soo superior?
Wait I thought your defect was a physical one. That you would deliberately misrepresent what I said about a lack of exposure to content but for amplification by outrage farmers and twist it into some sort of gotcha about the left, especially to one one who isn't actually left...like at all...suggests you may possess mental defect as well.
 
Man who presents as cat still believing Jaguar advert is trying to turn people into transvestites. More at nine.
To be fair, Jaguar looks like they killed their cat and seems to have used the Jaguar branding like its a new form of "cougar" related to the person.

The killing of Jaguar icon is my Furry biased reason for not liking the rebranding and want the old Jaguar back. (Car biased being I prefer their old sportscar approach instead of what maybe EV Rolls Royce)
 
Worst take of the decade. Good lord :lol:
Worst take huh? Wow.

You obviously don't know a lot about me. I was born with a disability called muscular dystrophy. This condition is chronic and it does not have a cure. I've been teased, ridiculed, and treated with contempt for a lot of my life. As my friends around me grew up, I was left to suffer and struggled just to get the respect I deserved. I was taken advantage of by teachers, and students saw me as a burden who would only serve to get in the way of what they cared about. People told me I was worthless. They never had to worry about a damn thing in their lives, getting what they wanted when they wanted it. I could not. I've had to face some dark truths about my condition that you wouldn't have to hear at any point in your life. Imagine not being able to get out of bed on your own. Imagine not being able to wipe your own butt. That's what my life is and I wish it wasn't. I've had to work hard for what I've got, just like my mum and dad. They have not lived privileged lives. My mother was born to Polish parents who suffered during the second world war. My dad was ostrocised and blamed for things that weren't entirely his fault by his father. He too was told that he was worthless. Good for nothing. He's had to scrimp and save to give my brother and I the best life possible. Mum has to work a crappy job to keep our heads above water. I'm only here still because I want to make a living for myself. Despite the harsh realities I face. I usually stick this stuff into the back of my head but I can only stay quiet for soo long.
 
Worst take huh? Wow.

You obviously don't know a lot about me. I was born with a disability called muscular dystrophy. This condition is chronic and it does not have a cure. I've been teased, ridiculed, and treated with contempt for a lot of my life. As my friends around me grew up, I was left to suffer and struggled just to get the respect I deserved. I was taken advantage of by teachers, and students saw me as a burden who would only serve to get in the way of what they cared about. People told me I was worthless. They never had to worry about a damn thing in their lives, getting what they wanted when they wanted it. I could not. I've had to face some dark truths about my condition that you wouldn't have to hear at any point in your life. Imagine not being able to get out of bed on your own. Imagine not being able to wipe your own butt. That's what my life is and I wish it wasn't. I've had to work hard for what I've got, just like my mum and dad. They have not lived privileged lives. My mother was born to Polish parents who suffered during the second world war. My dad was ostrocised and blamed for things that weren't entirely his fault by his father. He too was told that he was worthless. Good for nothing. He's had to scrimp and save to give my brother and I the best life possible. Mum has to work a crappy job to keep our heads above water. I'm only here still because I want to make a living for myself. Despite the harsh realities I face. I usually stick this stuff into the back of my head but I can only stay quiet for soo long.
tumblr_mt0e5ftbHs1sfnn0mo1_r1_400.gif
 
I, umm...am sorry to hear that, and it's very unfortunate that you had to go through that.

But for the millionth time, wrong thread for that stuff.

You're right though; I don't know a lot about you. But now I know you like to keep fighting and all of a sudden drop a backstory to try and salvage the situation...but to me it looks like a "playing the victim for sympathy" attempt.

Again, I'm sorry for how things turned out for you. I really am. But now you're just asking for more trouble than you already have.




A peculiar ad from an automotive manufacturer certainly didn't go the direction I was expecting.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, Jaguar looks like they killed their cat and seems to have used the Jaguar branding like its a new form of "cougar" related to the person.

The killing of Jaguar icon is my Furry biased reason for not liking the rebranding and want the old Jaguar back. (Car biased being I prefer their old sportscar approach instead of what maybe EV Rolls Royce)
Missed opportunity to have the "AI Assistant" from the VGT into a fleshed out thing (much like Mini's AI Dog assistant) imo.
 
Counterpoint: Drag Queen Story Hour is for entertainment, has nothing to do with gender ideology, and doesn't represent legitimate harm either way.

Conservative is when you cry like a little bitch about things that don't matter.

Wait I thought your defect was a physical one. That you would deliberately misrepresent what I said about a lack of exposure to content but for amplification by outrage farmers and twist it into some sort of gotcha about the left, especially to one one who isn't actually left...like at all...suggests you may possess mental defect as well.
Oh, no, they lack the cognitive capacity for introspection.
I didn’t think we were allowed to question someone’s mental or cognitive abilities.
 
What was this thread about again, oh that’s right, Jaguar’s rebranding! Stay on topic folks.

I didn’t think we were allowed to question someone’s mental or cognitive abilities.
Good grief...

(On topic):
The more I look at it the more I like it. Brutal yet beautiful (imo). And I'm really liking that Miami Pink colour. Wrong big cat but it's giving me Pink Panther vibes.
 
Back