Legalizing incest marriage

[BHRxRacer]

@Famine lawyered his way out of answering a question in another thread. Instead he just said “it depends on how far you want to go”. Well, right now I’m very interested “how far” you folks would go with your definition of marriage.



Note 1: This is not about their right to sex, only “marriage”.
Note 2: “Incest” here is specifically father-son/daughter, mother-son/daughter or siblings. Forget cousins.
Note 3: The definition of marriage, is the one used by Famine (and I assume the rest of the same sex marriage approving people). Here it is:

The word predates religion and merely means "to provide with a husband or wife". It doesn't mention genders or children.

that definition doesn't mention the gender of the person receiving the husband or wife.

It doesn't say "To provide a husband with a wife, or a wife with a husband.". It says "To provide with a husband or wife."

Note 4: the definition itself is not the question. Just assume it is the correct one for the sake of the argument.



So, I’m sure that definition doesn’t mention anything about who the male(s)/female(s) are either, or if they’re related. Are you guys going to be consistent with this logic and allow a father and his girl to get married?

Edit-

Poll option 4: No - just no. Vote in the thread until a mod changes the poll.

 

[Jahgee]

I'm confused by the poll, do I vote on how I apply logic, or my thoughts on Incest marriages

 

[BHRxRacer]

I'm confused by the poll, do I vote on how I apply logic, or my thoughts on Incest marriages

They're both covered. If you define marriage like Famine does, you should vote yes. If you don't think it should be legalized, vote for the 2nd or 3rd option (depending on your reason). I'll add a 4th option for "other" reasons...

edit-

Can't add the option.

 

[ULTRAVIOLENZZ]

I can't imagine that. Too "crazy" for me. Sorry for the lack of knowledge in topic or better things to say. But way too crazy...

 

[Azure Flare]

(I think I use this video too many times.)

When the option for "No, just no" gets added, I'll vote for that.

 

[Just1nn_]

This just seems.. weird.
I'm not against it nor do I support it. It just doesn't seem right.

My opinion anyway, although I don't know of anyway to justify it.

Guys, is it alright if I marry a car or a tree? Sounds just as reasonable.

 

[BHRxRacer]

I can't imagine that. Too "crazy" for me. Sorry for the lack of knowledge in topic or better things to say. But way too crazy...

Okay, why? It's the same logic applied in the same sex marriage argument.

 

[jimipitbull]

Insect marriage would be more interesting than my sister

 

[The Bman]

One word;

No.

 

[ULTRAVIOLENZZ]

Okay, why? It's the same logic applied in the same sex marriage argument.

Because in our world right now, there are a lot of other "options" to marry. I will only marry (I can't even say it because I'm disgusted) my mother or sister if we are the only humans left on Earth and I want to have legal ownership(?) (I don't know the right term I'm not married yet) to her. Also I think that's what happening in the cultist sects (aside from abuse of power) because they close themselves to society they're like the only humans left in their world.

 

[BHRxRacer]

Because in our world right now, there are a lot of other "options" to marry. I will only marry (I can't even say it because I'm disgusted) my mother or sister if we are the only humans left on Earth and I want to have legal ownership(?) (I don't know the right term I'm not married yet) to her. Also I think that's what happening in the cultist sects (aside from abuse of power) because they close themselves to society they're like the only humans left in their world.

Gay people have the option to marry women as well. Why legalize gay marriage then? Who are you to say who gets married to who?

 

[kennylmao]

Nah, hell no. I want the best genetics for my kids (if I were to have kids).

 

[ULTRAVIOLENZZ]

Gay people have the option to marry women as well. Why legalize gay marriage then? Who are you to say who gets married to who?

Marriage (often) = Sex.
Two men having sex = No babies = Babies don't have health problems
Two women having sex = No babies = Babies don't have health problems
Incest = Babies = With health problems

If they want to legalize incest marriage and produce unhealthy offsprings then so be it. But that will lead us all humans to catastrophe. Leave it to the royals.

 

[Famine]

@Famine lawyered his way out of answering a question in another thread.

Translation: I couldn't put a dent in someone's argument, so I'm going to troll the site by calling them out in an entirely new, useless thread by asking a question they already answered in the thread I couldn't argue properly in.

Incestuous I'm not all that bothered about - largely incest is just a decision of how far away is acceptable. Like us, you have a Royal Family and royal families are legendary for the closeness of their relational marriages. In some parts of the world, 1st cousins is acceptable (the children of brothers/sisters), in others it's 2nd cousins (the children of children of brothers/sisters). I'm not fussed really - my brother's an ugly arse anyway.

We've already discussed incest in the recent past here. If you're not fine with it, chuck out all the "adult" videos with blonde twins in it.

If you want to ask me a question, ask me a question (even though I'd already answered it).

Oh and you can't afford any more attention from the staff. Think very carefully before trolling the site again.