Instead of a new RX model, just save the money and spend it on developing the engine for use in the MX-5 and charge an extra $5k or something for the option. Maybe make it a fixed roof coupe, for $30-35k
Personally I have never understood why Mazda never made this connection the mx5 is without a doubt the car they are best known for in recent years and with good reason , it's a brilliant little car . And the rotary engine IS MAZDA .
Production costs aside, I dare say it's not a cheap engine to produce, it would become an icon overnight .
I'd say it's not quite that simple. Simplicity, reliability, efficiency, and durability are as important to the MX-5 ethos as fun and involvement. Remember the MX-5 was the answer to the fragile and unreliable European roadster. Putting a rotary in the MX-5 would likely compromise its universal appeal, and even damage the car's reputation. That would be catastrophic for Mazda, as the MX-5 is a core product, unlike sports cars from other mainstream manufacturers.
From an enthusiast point of view, I like the idea as I stated before. It's not so easy to call from a marketing & business point of view.
You skipped over the reliability and simplicity points. A used car salesman warned against me buying a RX-8 and my brother heard someone at the same dealership on a different another day telling another perspective buyer there's only one mechanic certified to work on rotaries in the province and he splits his time between Calgary and the States.And there in lies the rub .
In modern times car manufacturers are more inclined to follow the financial line rather than pushing the boundaries of experimentation and individualism .
Just ask anyone who's had the fortune to drive a Miura . We all look past its one overiding fault, it was a complete dog to drive at high speed ( allegedly ) . But do we all start to dribble at the mere mention of its name ?
If it's the only engine, sure. But as an option for those that would prefer it, I disagree.Putting a rotary in the MX-5 would likely compromise its universal appeal, and even damage the car's reputation.
In all fairness, the first gen rx7 was built with the same exact ethos. So much so in fact, that many SA/FB enthusiasts see the Miata as the more natural progression of the rx7 than the FC. The only reason Mazda keeps running into reliability issues is because they keep coming up with stupid ideas to fix emissions problems. IE starving the rear rotor during deceleration or turning off the omp under some conditions.I'd say it's not quite that simple. Simplicity, reliability, efficiency, and durability are as important to the MX-5 ethos as fun and involvement. Remember the MX-5 was the answer to the fragile and unreliable European roadster. Putting a rotary in the MX-5 would likely compromise its universal appeal, and even damage the car's reputation. That would be catastrophic for Mazda, as the MX-5 is a core product, unlike sports cars from other mainstream manufacturers.
From an enthusiast point of view, I like the idea as I stated before. It's not so easy to call from a marketing & business point of view.
You skipped over the reliability and simplicity points. A used car salesman warned against me buying a RX-8 and my brother heard someone at the same dealership on a different another day telling another perspective buyer there's only one mechanic certified to work on rotaries in the province and he splits his time between Calgary and the States.
Jeez, despite reading up on it multiple times I still keep forgetting what you have to do on while starting it to avoid accidentally flooding the engine.
Stumbled upon this randomly. I don't even know where to begin honestly....Ferrari, Pagani, Koenigsegg? What?
Global Automotive Rotary (Wankel) Engine Market 2017-2021 - Key vendors are Ferrari, Mazda Motor & Porsche - Research and Markets
Technavio's analysts forecast the global automotive rotary (Wankel) engines market to grow at a CAGR of 15.50% during the period 2017-2021.
What's going on here?
Range extenders?
http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-car...ick-drive-mazda-demio-ev-with-range-extender/That's an interesting idea. Low torque engines can be efficient in steady state conditions. I'm a 2-cycle guy, and have always thought a light, efficient, clean (they are already being made, don't start with the 2 strokes are dirty stuff) 2-cycle engine used in a hybrid system would be a great fit for small vehicles. Torque off the line combined with high rpm power. Rotaries are similar.
I am now 57-58 years old, 30 years later I will die. This rotary engine is my dream and also our chief designer, he also has the same dream, therefore I have some years left to make this dream come true. Therefore, 10 years or 20 years, no, I died [sic]. Before I retire, that’s my dream.
A very probable assumption, and as I said, I am in the need to see it first group. However, those lines look very reminiscent of the RX concept, and the coincidence of the rotary anniversary lends just a touch of hope.I'd say that's a preview for the new 6 if you ask me. Showing the RX-Vision and then deciding to give us a 4-door Rotary similar to the RX-8 instead would be a bit disappointing.
I still highly doubt they would just jump from a coupe concept to a 4-door and be like "surprise, this is what you're getting instead". All we know is that it's a preview for their design direction. It probably won't even turn into anything more than that.A very probable assumption, and as I said, I am in the need to see it first group. However, those lines look very reminiscent of the RX concept, and the coincidence of the rotary anniversary lends just a touch of hope.
As for being 4 door. I've been in enough really fast cars to know that number is arbitrary.