Toronado
That's a pretty good one. A car announcement that consists of nothing more than a badly Photoshopped picture of a different, well-known car and some pie in the sky specifications?
...
Oh wait. They're serious?
They showed the car and everything
They showed the car and everything
mazdaman
I'd like Mazda more if they made less rust buckets and more rotary!
Nobody has made rust buckets in the last 20 years...
Auto BlogWe now have enthusiastic confirmation that this next-gen rotary engine is really and truly going forward. It is still referred to as 16X and has several priorities. First is to lower fuel consumption compared to the RX-8's engine, while still making gains in terms of performance. The second is to reduce the burning of oil that was happening at the highest revs. And the third and final priority, and perhaps most key for enthusiasts, is to give the powertrain a big torque upgrade.
What we were told by a Mazda USA insider is that the first application of the new 16X engine will be happening in two years' time in an as yet undisclosed new model. Oh, the mind races to our eternal Mazda wish list... How to solve the failings of the Renesis engine that preceded all of this? "The key to both higher torque and better fuel consumption," said the insider, "is creating a longer stroke engine." But we're talking a rotary engine with the fat-triangle rotor and toroidal cam, so how does one determine the way to call this long-stroke or not? "By the path of travel within the combustion space dictated by the engineers," says Mr. Insider.
What this means for the relative engine capacity and blueprint of the 16X engine is yet to be shown. Longer stroke engines can create greater torque and do so at lower revs. This, it is thought, is what will drastically improve fuel efficiency, emissions, and oil abuse in the 16X.
Terrible idea. My FC has a better power-to-torque ratio than, has a lower torque peak, and higher redline. The T2 has an even broader torque band a lot more of it to boot.250hp @ 6,500rpm & 200lbs*ft torque @ 5,000rpm with a 7,500rpm redline in a 2600lb
I presume Mazda is still shying away from turbocharging?
Probably. I think they see it as cheating - clearly they don't really need it to be efficient. The use of of a turbo leaves the opportunity to spend less development on the engine itself. I think Mazda is trying to maximize everything step by step.Yeah, the RENESIS is like the rotary equivalent of a mega-VTEC screamer. By trying to provide turbo-grade power with natural aspiration, they created the "rotaries are gutless" myth that is now retroactively applied to the whole 13B line. Like you said, Keef, even though the old naturally aspirated engines produce similar torque to the RENESIS, they're not so peaky.
I presume Mazda is still shying away from turbocharging?
You can get it in LA, California. Yes it was.Where do you buy hydrogen fuel these days? Wasn't hydrogen supposed to be the fuel source for charging a battery and driving the vehicle with electric motors?