Need For Speed: Most Wanted 2012

  • Thread starter Ddrizle
  • 4,285 comments
  • 394,077 views
If you've been in a Ferrari, you wouldn't be saying muscle cars have good handling though.

Yeah, don't bother trying to argue with this muscle car fanboy.

See how he already disregarded the handling characteristic and now bringing up horsepower?


*shakes head*
 
So? Ferrari passes in corner & Muscle car thunders pass after. Ferrari's are truly the most overrated cars on the planet. They are under powered bloody turds.

And what's with you using the word fanboy you Hot Wheel fanboy, crappy plus annoying Japanese music fanboy & Shelby fanboy. Everyone is a fanboy so ****ing don't call others out on it.
 
I'm not a Japanese Music, Shelby, or Hot Wheels fanboy.
I'm more of a Matchbox person... Loljk.
But no, muscle cars don't have more HP either.
My dad's Mr2(with 500hp, 11.8s) can do a quarter mile faster than a Camaro(11.9-12s) , and so can a 458 Italia(10.8s).
The Italia has very close HP to the Camaro too. But it is better around corners too.

I'm not a Ferrari fanboy either, I don't even like Ferrari that much, I think they're a little bit snobby tbh. But it's a wellknown european brand.
 
MY GF's RX-7 has near 700HP & makes exotics look like lawn mowers. Anyone can make a normal car into a fire breather. A stock MR2 is a turd with wheels that my Cobalt can beat.

They use Camaro's in racing & those can completely destroy a Ferrari. :P
 
MY GF's RX-7 has near 700HP & makes exotics look like lawn mowers. Anyone can make a normal car into a fire breather. A stock MR2 is a turd with wheels that my Cobalt can beat.

They use Camaro's in racing & those can completely destroy a Ferrari. :P

A cobalt would go nowhere near an Mr2 loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool.
Especially with corners.

If they use Camaros in racing, they they must be done up.
By then they'd have wings, stiff suspension, and have been lightened, with carbon monocoques, plexiglass windows, and track tyres.
At this point, your 'Camaro' is no longer a muscle car.

But you can also do this to Ferraris, and you can make them run rings around a fat camaro.

And people have Nissan GTRs ewith only 500hp that could drag off that Rx7 no problem.
 
Last edited:
WAIT WHAT.... UnderPowered Turd......


Ferrari 458 has 562Horses to the back Wheel.
F12 730 Horses to the wheel.....

If you have a modified car(Racing Coilover, ECU, Turbo`s Superchargers, crankshafts, thrown all the seats out for weight saving) Now how that really a Muscle Car anymore? Obviously no way it will be faster then a Ferrari, Lamborghini no ****....But one thing is Maintence, and your MPG will go way down.Were Lucky we Live in America gas only cost like 4$ a Gallon, Because look at the other countries around us gas is very expensive. Also Cars are much MUCH more expensive countries around US.


And in racing.....


GT1


The Porsche GT3 RSR GT1, and Ferrari 458 GT1. Those are some of the top cars for the GT1 Class. There is the C6-R but you dont see as much as the Porsches and Ferrari....


Honestly, in my opinion in 24Hours of Le Mans, 24 Hour of Nurburgring, You can have the best car but lose. Like honestly its about *Drivers* and *Stragetic*. Its about the team. If you dont have team that has effort then well you wont win anything....

Whole other story
 
Last edited:
A cobalt would go nowhere near an Mr2 loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool.
Especially with corners.
Regular model MR2 puts out in the area of 130HP. Regular Cobalt model has 20+ that. Now the Cobalt is slightly heavier. Now I own a Cobalt & trust me it can ****ing corner. It don't understeer like a normal FF car. It in fact has slight oversteer.

I'll like the owner defend the RX-7 because I'm telling her someone is bad mouthing it. :P
 
Regular model MR2 puts out in the area of 130HP. Regular Cobalt model has 20+ that. Now the Cobalt is slightly heavier. Now I own a Cobalt & trust me it can ****ing corner. It don't understeer like a normal FF car. It in fact has slight oversteer.

I'll like the owner defend the RX-7 because I'm telling her someone is bad mouthing it. :P

Im pretty sure the MR2 has a lower Center of Gravity making it ALOT quicker around the corner then the Cobalt... The Acceleration should be a bit better then the cobalt aswell.....

HorsePower isnt always the key....
 
Cobalt also has more torque plus the Cobalt (even the base models) are pretty low to the ground. Mine scrapes road if I don't watch it.
 
Im pretty sure the MR2 has a lower Center of Gravity making it ALOT quicker around the corner then the Cobalt... The Acceleration should be a bit better then the cobalt aswell.....

HorsePower isnt always the key....

The Mr2 from '97. the GT-s. has around 250 hp....
And they are veeery good at cornering
 
My point is that Mr2s can corner even better. And are lighter.
Cobalt is 1 sec faster in a qutr mile. But it can't corner nearly as well.
The Cobalt SS, btw. The special version.
 
MR2's are light MR cars meaning oversteer out the whazoo! It may corner better when it's not spinning out. :lol:

Anyway, I hit Cobalts the most in MW. Evil traffic car. :lol:
 
Yup I can in about 10 min.
Have you been on to get more speedpoints since?

I mean, it's sorta hard tryna compete properly with a stock Ford GT. :L
 
I'm getting a few wins and some top 3's. but actually it is when your against Bugatti'a and venoms lmao

Yeah.. You can get up there sometimes with the top 3 in a slow car like a GT, but usually only when there aren't already decent drivers in Veyrons and Venoms.

It lagged and double posted, how do I delete this?
 
I'm getting a few wins and some top 3's. but actually it is when your against Bugatti'a and venoms lmao

Yeah.. You can get up there sometimes with the top 3 during races* in a slow car like a GT, but usually only when there aren't already decent drivers in Veyrons and Venoms.

* challenges and jumps are usually more even.
 
And people have Nissan GTRs ewith only 500hp that could drag off that Rx7 no problem.
AWD cars are for pussies who can't handle power. My RX-7 is over 1,000lbs lighter than a GT-R. Now tell me that poor excuse of a car can out drag my RX-7 which can do 0-60 in less than 3 seconds. Oh, don't spout the GT-R out cornering my RX-7 since RWD cars have much better handling than AWD cars will ever have.
 
AWD cars are for pussies who can't handle power. My RX-7 is over 1,000lbs lighter than a GT-R. Now tell me that poor excuse of a car can out drag my RX-7 which can do 0-60 in less than 3 seconds. Oh, don't spout the GT-R out cornering my RX-7 since RWD cars have much better handling than AWD cars will ever have.

Such Bullcrap right there its a bit scary:grumpy:....


Im pretty Sure YOUR RX-7 Wont beat the lap time around nurburgring...
 
The car is HEAVILY modified dude & no it couldn't beat the Nord record. I race the car at the tracks here in PA & regularly lap Lambo's, Porsche's, etc. You could make a Fiat 500 a Lambo killer with enough money & work put into it.
 
^I rode in it & needed a neck brace after. Don't doubt the women. Now enough off-topicness. We're all to passionate about cars. :lol:
 
The car is HEAVILY modified dude & no it couldn't beat the Nord record. I race the car at the tracks here in PA & regularly lap Lambo's, Porsche's, etc. You could make a Fiat 500 a Lambo killer with enough money & work put into it.

Okay so prove it then.

 
You could not use a fiat 500 to lap lambos. You'd have to put a different engine in it, and then it wouldn't be a fiat 500 anymore.
AWD cars area very good way to put power down well.
Your Rx7 would be a lot faster if it was AWD, with traction control.
Yeah I was just going to say, you do a better lap around Norschliefe in your Rx7, good luck. A GTR can do 0-100kph in around 2.7s. I doubt the Rx7 can do that. Maybe 3-3.5s.

You say Rwd cars have better handling. An rx7 is FR, which isn't as good as an MR around corners. But also, a Nissan GTR is faster around a track, won't spin as easy, has more traction, and still has less power.
 
AWD cars just have more grip at the cost of cornering ability. The turd that's the Veyron is an extreme example of this. RWD cars can take corners faster than AWD cars. Pit the Vette against the GT-R. The Vette will out corner that POS until the cows come home. Also remember that AWD cars have extra weight being lugged around... She's right, AWD are for beginners who can't drive. Why you think the GT Academy had the people in GT-R's? :dunce:

Also you saying a GT-R can do 0-62 in under 3 seconds made me laugh hard. :lol: It does at best 3.2 seconds.
 
You guys are bad at arguing.

YesButNo, AWDs have quicker start-up acceleration. That's all you're really trying to say but your wording is misleading the pony goofballs here.
 
Back