- 1,154
- Canada
Yes, they were sold as Infiniti. Of course most people have zero ideas of them being rebadged Skylines.The Skyline has been sold in the US and has been independently SUV-sloppified for twenty years now.
Yes, they were sold as Infiniti. Of course most people have zero ideas of them being rebadged Skylines.The Skyline has been sold in the US and has been independently SUV-sloppified for twenty years now.
Another one of those "Gran Turismo taught me" cases for... probably almost everyone outside of Japan, at least.Yes, they were sold as Infiniti. Of course most people have zero ideas of them being rebadged Skylines.
Hot take: I don't see this as passing antitrust approval, at least outside of Japan.
Well....this aged like milk.Nissan R&D employee here. The media is (as they do) blowing this a bit out of proportion. The company is definitely not going anywhere. Sales year over year are up and there's some good stuff coming down the pipeline. This isn't the first time this has happened and we will rise again.
Though not entirely unexpected. In the last 10 years or so Acuras haven't really looked that much better than the average Honda on the outside, and Infiniti's weirdly bulbous design language has been nothing but off-putting in most respects. Plus fullsize pickups are doing the "living room on wheels" gimmick much better these days for about the same cost, and are probably cheaper in terms of both insurance and maintenance.Surprisingly, both Acura and Infiniti don't seem to be thriving at this point (in my eyes).
Now that you mentioned that, I felt (even before Honda rumors/announcement) that Nissan could just pull out of the US market given how damaged (beyond repair?) their brand reputation is there. Perhaps the Honda merger might accelerate that.The US won't care and any other market Nissan could just leave.
The European part already (almost?) happened and as much I would like to see it for chaos, the Japanese government will probably fight tooth and nail to prevent them from falling into Chinese hands.I feel like part of it is also to make sure that the Nissan and Mitsubishi IPs stay with a Japanese firm, instead of ending up in the pockets of a European or Chinese company that would no doubt misuse them.
Hot take: I don't see this as passing antitrust approval, at least outside of Japan.
Regarding that, Renault is presumably okay with the merger talks:The European part already (almost?) happened and as much I would like to see it for chaos, the Japanese government will probably fight tooth and nail to prevent them from falling into Chinese hands.
(Post delayed to avoid double posting, while also ensuring ping.)
Didn't that part also essentially destroy the Chrysler portion of both DaimlerChrysler and Stellantis?Let's hope they gut Nissan corporate and management staff. Honda doesn't want this to become a Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger where they kept the Boeing brand and resources but switched to MD corporate and management staff. And that right there destroyed a once great company.
According to Japanese outlet Nikkei, Taiwanese contract manufacturer Foxconn saw Nissan's troubles and pondered acquiring a big chunk of shares in the automaker. Foxconn fancies that buy because it's already entered the EV market and aspires to become a bigger player.
Nikkei has since reported that Honda is so unhappy about Foxconn's ambitions that it decided to push for a merger.
Foxconn has already created EV reference designs it hopes automakers will adopt. To date it's had limited success with that endeavor.
The difference is that Mercedes was performing what was functionally a corporate raid of a healthy and extremely profitable company with a model lineup that was class leading (among the domestics) and modern that they pretended was a merger and Chrysler's board cashed out to stay quiet about it and threw Chrysler's best (of the domestics) engineering staff to the wolves.Didn't that part also essentially destroy the Chrysler portion of both DaimlerChrysler and Stellantis?
That one responds to the lightest criticism of anything to which they are beholden with the energy of a thousand suns. Absolutely deranged.Well....this aged like milk.
To put a positive spin on this, we can say that Chrysler keeps rising from the ashes. Then again, they keep setting themselves on fire shortly thereafter.The difference is that Mercedes was performing what was functionally a corporate raid of a healthy and extremely profitable company with a model lineup that was class leading (among the domestics) and modern that they pretended was a merger and Chrysler's board cashed out to stay quiet about it and threw Chrysler's best (of the domestics) engineering staff to the wolves.
Honda gutting Nissan would be a net positive.
It's a hybrid with a CVT. It's not going to sell very well, I can already see it coming.Prelude is a start. With success of the 86/BRZ and how many people have gobbled up Mustang and MX-5, the price point needs to be right for a Honda sports coupe.
I've always been curious why Honda never entered the full-size truck market and I don't think it would help them without hurting Nissan. The Patrol is a trusted name in the rest of the world, however due to Nissan's complete lack of market analysis the Armada has never been close to competing with other full-size SUVs in the American market, and particularly Toyota in the off-road/adventure/lifestyle full-size market.Do it. I want a Honda based off the Armada/Patrol.
It’ll definitely help Honda over here. Since the Fit/Jazz is gone, the non-Civic Type R is upmarket and I can’t see the Accord doing anything in its segment, Honda needs something. Anything to get people in the showroom.
Prelude is a start. With success of the 86/BRZ and how many people have gobbled up Mustang and MX-5, the price point needs to be right for a Honda sports coupe.
I agree with CodeRed51 here that the Prelude is probably going to be a flop. The Civic Coupe was dropped for a reason, because even in Si trim it didn't sell enough to justify itself. The Prelude is not only a non-Si but doesn't even have the essentials that sold the Si in the first place, namely being a relatively simple enthusiast product with a manual transmission. Honda is currently finding themselves with a massive enthusiast gap below the Type R and the Prelude won't fill that. Enthusiasts are not going to buy a Civic Coupe Hybrid that literally doesn't even have a transmission at all. It's not a CVT like you said, it's an ICE+generator separated by a clutch from a traction motor, and those two units only engage the clutch at above highway speeds where tradition electric motors run out of steam. There is no transmission at all. It's actually pretty close to being a range-extended EV. It'll be a total flop just like the CR-Z was. A total misread of market demands, which seems like a colossal mistake given how well the Type R is selling. Literally all they needed to do was drop the Si drivetrain into the Prelude and it would sell buckets. Or just skip all that new development for a dumb new product and just keep making the Civic Coupe in Si trim.It's a hybrid with a CVT. It's not going to sell very well, I can already see it coming.
Honestly the Sentra is a good car. Sure it doesn't have a hybrid trim, but it can still get 40+ mpg. I hit 49 mpg on my '24 SV and so far 43 mpg on my '25 SR. Still looks good, interior isn't bad, seats are comfy.Currently, the best product Nissan makes is the Frontier
The Prelude is going to flop first of all because it's a coupe and second because it's a hybrid coupe. Nobody wants that. The only coupes that sell are enthusiast coupes, but Honda already dropped the previous-generation Civic Coupe and Si Coupe because they weren't selling enough. If the enthusiast product wasn't selling then what makes them think they'll sell a less practical and more expensive hybrid to normies?If you’re both saying it will flop, how would the Prelude sell like buckets if the Si was dropped? Guess the Type R motor in the Prelude would do the trick.
What I meant by "good" is something people actually care about. I drive all these economy cars from all these OEMs all the time as rental cars and while Nissan desserves their due in making effective cars, that's literally all they are. Nissan's autopilot is rather good but besides that the cars are completely anonymous and uninspiring. None of them do the job of driving interest except for the GT-R and Pro-4X. A new Xterra would certainly be a driver, or an IDX or Silvia, although honestly an easy-to-develop SE-R trim would probably work. The enthusiast products might not sell much but they make news and get regular people interested in the brand.Honestly the Sentra is a good car. Sure it doesn't have a hybrid trim, but it can still get 40+ mpg. I hit 49 mpg on my '24 SV and so far 43 mpg on my '25 SR. Still looks good, interior isn't bad, seats are comfy.
Frontier needs a bad ass offroad trim like Colorado ZR2, Canyon AT4X, etc. Pro-4X trim just isn't cutting it. But as long as they can hold on to the V6, it'll have a leg up on the other midsize trucks.
My last trip to Tennessee I rented a Mazda3 and hated it. Not sure if it was that car or if they're all like this, but it had an intermittent hesitation when applying light throttle that felt like a missfire and it was super annoying.The Prelude is going to flop first of all because it's a coupe and second because it's a hybrid coupe. Nobody wants that. The only coupes that sell are enthusiast coupes, but Honda already dropped the previous-generation Civic Coupe and Si Coupe because they weren't selling enough. If the enthusiast product wasn't selling then what makes them think they'll sell a less practical and more expensive hybrid to normies?
The main reason the enthusiast product, the previous-gen Si Coupe, wasn't selling is because of Honda's refusal to improve the platform. The current-gen Si Sedan still has a 200hp engine although for the past couple generations its been in turbo guise. Mazda has improved the Miata, Toyota has improved the 86, Honda has refused, and after literal decades of selling a Civic Si with the exact same output which eventually fell behind similar entry-level enthusiast cars, including from Hyundai. Hyundai and Toyota have stolen all of Honda's steam when it comes to enthusiast products because Honda has refused to take any risk.
What I meant by "good" is something people actually care about. I drive all these economy cars from all these OEMs all the time as rental cars and while Nissan desserves their due in making effective cars, that's literally all they are. Nissan's autopilot is rather good but besides that the cars are completely anonymous and uninspiring. None of them do the job of driving interest except for the GT-R and Pro-4X. A new Xterra would certainly be a driver, or an IDX or Silvia, although honestly an easy-to-develop SE-R trim would probably work. The enthusiast products might not sell much but they make news and get regular people interested in the brand.
Mazda in comparison makes genuinely impressive cars that stand out from the sea of Nissans and Kias et al in the rental car lot. Hell, Mazda's products and brand are so exciting that they don't even need enthusiast trims to grow sales. Their decision to finally allow fleet sales was a great one because now it's clear to rental customers how much nicer Mazda's cars are than the competition. Nissan needs something because they currently have very little. Same with Mitsubishi. A once-iconic brand that has been reduced to uninspired rubble.
I can agree with that. Before I got my ‘04 EP3, I was holding out because I knew Honda would do the normal update to the ‘02 in two years. Thought they would upgrade to the Type-R spec when I saw the update had five-lugs instead of the previous year four-lug. I was disappointed that wasn’t the case, but went and bought the then new ‘04 model anyway. Should have had the same output as the RSX Type-S, but it’s funny people used to ask me if my car was a new hybrid(especially when I removed the badges).The Prelude is going to flop first of all because it's a coupe and second because it's a hybrid coupe. Nobody wants that. The only coupes that sell are enthusiast coupes, but Honda already dropped the previous-generation Civic Coupe and Si Coupe because they weren't selling enough. If the enthusiast product wasn't selling then what makes them think they'll sell a less practical and more expensive hybrid to normies?
The main reason the enthusiast product, the previous-gen Si Coupe, wasn't selling is because of Honda's refusal to improve the platform. The current-gen Si Sedan still has a 200hp engine although for the past couple generations its been in turbo guise. Mazda has improved the Miata, Toyota has improved the 86, Honda has refused, and after literal decades of selling a Civic Si with the exact same output which eventually fell behind similar entry-level enthusiast cars, including from Hyundai. Hyundai and Toyota have stolen all of Honda's steam when it comes to enthusiast products because Honda has refused to take any risk.
What I meant by "good" is something people actually care about. I drive all these economy cars from all these OEMs all the time as rental cars and while Nissan desserves their due in making effective cars, that's literally all they are. Nissan's autopilot is rather good but besides that the cars are completely anonymous and uninspiring. None of them do the job of driving interest except for the GT-R and Pro-4X. A new Xterra would certainly be a driver, or an IDX or Silvia, although honestly an easy-to-develop SE-R trim would probably work. The enthusiast products might not sell much but they make news and get regular people interested in the brand.
Mazda in comparison makes genuinely impressive cars that stand out from the sea of Nissans and Kias et al in the rental car lot. Hell, Mazda's products and brand are so exciting that they don't even need enthusiast trims to grow sales. Their decision to finally allow fleet sales was a great one because now it's clear to rental customers how much nicer Mazda's cars are than the competition. Nissan needs something because they currently have very little. Same with Mitsubishi. A once-iconic brand that has been reduced to uninspired rubble.
The reason the Ecoboost sells is because it's relatively cheap and looks cool like a genuine sports car. But in America the GT sells almost as much as the Ecoboost despite the former being propped up by fleet sales, and it does that because it's an absolute bargain of a serious sports car.The coupe thing is a weird one as well. I asked a Mustang owner here why Mustang is the top selling sports car here. He said the price. The small back seat is a non-issue. People like the look and it comes in a fast four-cylinder and convertible options. Even with the boom in SUVs, the Mustang is still hot. It’s been on sale here for ten years.
It’s why I’m thinking the Prelude could do well for Honda here. Of course, if it does flop in the USA, that’s certain doom for the rest of the world.