- 19
- GTP_bilts
Disclaimer: This post will demonstrate that players from PAL countries participating in the WRS are consistently faster than those from NTSC countries. I do not claim to know why they are faster. One possible explanation is that the PAL version of the game differs from the NTSC version in some way. There are many other plausible explanations, including cultural/demographic differences and pure chance. I'm posting this because the data is interesting, not because it's conclusive.
Anyhow...
Looking at the WRS results from the first 4 weeks, I noticed that they have been largely dominated by players from PAL countries. NTSC players comprise a third or more of the participants, but have never had more than one representative in the top 10.
Being a nerd, I grabbed the data and analyzed it, with the following results:
Week 1:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 65.76s, Standard Deviation: 0.90
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 66.32s, Standard Deviation: 0.98
Week 2:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 81.72s, Standard Deviation: 1.28
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 82.48s, Standard Deviation: 1.49
Week 3:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 70.29s, Standard Deviation: 0.81
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 70.93s, Standard Deviation: 1.04
Week 4:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 95.31s, Standard Deviation: 0.85
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 96.13s, Standard Deviation: 1.32
Translation: the NTSC folks are significantly slower and less consistent than the PAL folks.
I also graphed out the results. The y-axis corresponds to lap time, while the x-axis is a percentile within NTSC, PAL, or all lap times. So, if you want to know what time to beat in order to be in the top 25% of NTSC players, you'd look for a blue dot above the 25% marker on the x-axis.
*Some notes about the data: I assumed that players from Canada, the USA, and Mexico were using NTSC, while all others were using PAL. I excluded all times where the player has not given a country of origin. I also removed one outlier from three of the graphs to make them more readable, but it doing so did not impact the graphs in any significant way.
My take:
What is causing this is not at all conclusive. I'm inclined to assume that we've just gathered a surplus of insanely talented PAL drivers. The top drivers are jaw-droppingly fast regardless of region. The fact that a Canadian won one week also suggests that there is no significant difference between the two versions. Further, I personally doubt that PD would have a reason to introduce subtle performance differences in the two versions
Nevertheless, the data is intriguing. Perhaps the difference is that the PAL players spend all night lapping while the NTSC players spend all night looking at meaningless data.
Anyhow...
Looking at the WRS results from the first 4 weeks, I noticed that they have been largely dominated by players from PAL countries. NTSC players comprise a third or more of the participants, but have never had more than one representative in the top 10.
Being a nerd, I grabbed the data and analyzed it, with the following results:
Week 1:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 65.76s, Standard Deviation: 0.90
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 66.32s, Standard Deviation: 0.98
Week 2:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 81.72s, Standard Deviation: 1.28
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 82.48s, Standard Deviation: 1.49
Week 3:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 70.29s, Standard Deviation: 0.81
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 70.93s, Standard Deviation: 1.04
Week 4:
PAL Mean Lap Time: 95.31s, Standard Deviation: 0.85
NTSC Mean Lap Time: 96.13s, Standard Deviation: 1.32
Translation: the NTSC folks are significantly slower and less consistent than the PAL folks.
I also graphed out the results. The y-axis corresponds to lap time, while the x-axis is a percentile within NTSC, PAL, or all lap times. So, if you want to know what time to beat in order to be in the top 25% of NTSC players, you'd look for a blue dot above the 25% marker on the x-axis.




*Some notes about the data: I assumed that players from Canada, the USA, and Mexico were using NTSC, while all others were using PAL. I excluded all times where the player has not given a country of origin. I also removed one outlier from three of the graphs to make them more readable, but it doing so did not impact the graphs in any significant way.
My take:
What is causing this is not at all conclusive. I'm inclined to assume that we've just gathered a surplus of insanely talented PAL drivers. The top drivers are jaw-droppingly fast regardless of region. The fact that a Canadian won one week also suggests that there is no significant difference between the two versions. Further, I personally doubt that PD would have a reason to introduce subtle performance differences in the two versions
Nevertheless, the data is intriguing. Perhaps the difference is that the PAL players spend all night lapping while the NTSC players spend all night looking at meaningless data.