- 38,930
- Application hell
- MP-Omnis
Yep, sending a tornado to wreak havoc and kill people. The very definition of good.
That's not what he was referring to. Please don't start in, or I'll be handing out more infractions.
Yep, sending a tornado to wreak havoc and kill people. The very definition of good.
That's not what he was referring to. Please don't start in, or I'll be handing out more infractions.
He said thank god another's family was OK. Do not start in.
I didn't realize that as he didn't quote. Still an odd thing to say but yeah, another thread.
I apologize.
Reminds me of this that's been making the rounds today:
Hello everyone. Yes, still alive but just on one of my enforced GTP breaks so I can concentrate on work. Hope no-one in the Oklahoma City region was badly affected by the tornado. Isn't Brett from around there?
But is there a good reason for the wood > brick thing? Is it simply cost? Just better to have a sturdy hurricane shelter and let the rest of the house take a beating each time?
This partly answers your question I think sir.http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2011/05/25/6717757-why-dont-oklahoma-houses-have-basements?lite
I'm not sure how the US compares to other parts of the world, but a large majority of the houses constructed here are made from wood. I don't think there's much you can do to save the house in this particular situation, but what needs to happen is that all houses in tornado alley NEED to have some sort of tornado shelter built in. Whether it's under ground or a concrete room, new home purchasers need to have that option when they are building their house.
Most of it is cost. These days, most newly-built middle-class houses with one or two floors are framed with wood here in Ohio. Some of them might have a brick facade for texture but that's it. Various types of brick are common for custom-built houses, but those are typically more expensive and built by higher-income people who can afford it. Even many wealthy houses are wood-framed with stucco or thin brick facades, not structural at all. My currently middle-class neighborhood was built in the 70s as part of a higher-end home show event and is a mixture of brick and wood. One house across from me has structural brick on the first floor with wood on the second. Almost all of them are a combination, with a few either being all wood or all brick.Right, something I have to ask, with very little personal experience/knowledge of the subject:
Noticed that a heck of a lot of the houses on the news reports seem to have been made largely of wood. Is there a reason, particularly in tornado alley, that this practice is so common? I would have thought that even under a tornado that houses would have a little more chance of remaining intact if they weren't constructed from wood. What prompted me to think such a thing was seeing an otherwise-destroyed family home on the news with a completely intact decorative brick arch above the front door.
I also realise, from the picture posted above alone, that there's only so much you can do - since there are metal girders and bricks looking rather damaged there. The other thing, purely speculatively, is that I'd marginally prefer to have a relatively light wooden house fall on top of me than a comparatively heavy brick one do so.
But is there a good reason for the wood > brick thing? Is it simply cost? Just better to have a sturdy hurricane shelter and let the rest of the house take a beating each time?
*snip*Whether it's under ground or a concrete room, new home purchasers need to have that option when they are building their house.
Most of it is cost. These days, most newly-built middle-class houses with one or two floors are framed with wood here in Ohio. Some of them might have a brick facade for texture but that's it. Various types of brick are common for custom-built houses, but those are typically more expensive and built by higher-income people who can afford it. Even many wealthy houses are wood-framed with stucco or thin brick facades, not structural at all. My currently middle-class neighborhood was built in the 70s as part of a higher-end home show event and is a mixture of brick and wood. One house across from me has structural brick on the first floor with wood on the second. Almost all of them are a combination, with a few either being all wood or all brick.
Because these days structural brick is so expensive, and because any house is likely to be damaged in tornado alley, it's just more feasible in the long run to use wood. It's cheaper for the builders, buyers, and insurance companies.
I think it was TB who worked for a construction company and might be able to shed more light on it. I can only speculate with what I know about my area.
I've never visited but from what I can tell the UK isn't and probably was never the most heavily forested area. It's rather amazing how quickly the trees disappear once people start building things with them, and that's how my area is full of city where it used to be nothing but dense forest. I imagine an eventual scarcity of trees had something to do with your historical stone and brick construction.Nice one, thanks for the insight 👍 That makes sense actually. Particularly with regards to insurance costs if the house has a high chance of getting flattened in a tornado.
And the use of brick pretty much everywhere in the UK probably partly explains why our houses are so damn expensive.
Thanks, that's pretty interesting 👍 Wonder if that soft land would also make creating suitable footings for a stronger house more problematic?
Why so many victims? Weren't people warned about the tornado incoming?
I'm not sure how the US compares to other parts of the world, but a large majority of the houses constructed here are made from wood. I don't think there's much you can do to save the house in this particular situation, but what needs to happen is that all houses in tornado alley NEED to have some sort of tornado shelter built in. Whether it's under ground or a concrete room, new home purchasers need to have that option when they are building their house.
The clay soil is very problematic. Clay soil shrinks and swells depending on the water content present in the soil. Add water to the soil and the clay will heave (expand). Take water away and the clay will settle (shrink).
This article pretty well covers the topic in a general manner without getting into too much detail.
Sounds like someone ought to come to Windsor and ask a few questions. Pop. 200,000, 99% of the homes built on pure clay soil as far as you can dig, probably 80-85% of them with full basements.
It's not an issue of needing to go anywhere to talk to anyone. The problem is developers/contractors do not want to pay for the additional cost that goes into putting in a basement.
Considering the magnitude of the storm and the path the tornado took, it is wonderful that there were not more victims.
I get it. But was there a way to evacuate them before?
Developers/contractors don't want to add a feature to homes they can profit from? Maybe it's different in Oklahoma, but up here in Windsor, we don't build homes for the most part, unless they are already sold. I know several people in the construction business and I can guarantee you that if the customer says, "I will give you $$$$ to add this to the house" , not a one of them will say no. I don't understand why a contractor would not want to add features to a home he can profit from and someone else is paying for it.
Oklahoma is not a rich state. The state ranks near the bottom of the U.S. in terms of median income. Pieces of land are mostly plentiful, money to spend to build and develop is not.
Many subdivisions are built and the houses sold afterwards. The addition of a basement is going to add quite a bit of extra cost to a house. That additional cost could be very tough to recoup if the house sits unsold because it is so much more expensive than other houses in the surrounding area. The developer/contractor is going to be eating the costs for materials/labor while that house goes unsold and many are not willing to do that for more than a very short period of time.
Now with regards to new construction where the house is sold before construction, a contractor is going to be more than willing to do whatever the owner want. If the owner wants a basement and pays accordingly, then that contractor is going to be more than willing to construct a basement.
This article provides more information on why storm cellars and basements are rare.
I can't explain why clay is suggested as the dominant part of loam soil. It's usually a small proportion.As explained by The Atlantic’s Megan Garber. the porous, red clay-based soil found in much of Oklahoma isn’t exactly conducive to basement-building:
Here's the problem with that when it comes to building basements and underground shelters: Clay is particularly fickle as a foundation for construction. When loamy soils absorb rainwater, they expand. And when the weather's dry, they contract. This inevitable and yet largely unpredictable variability makes basement-building a particular challenge, since it makes it nearly impossible to establish firm foundations for underground construction
If I'm reading that right, she's equating clay soils to loamy soils when they are nearly the opposite. Loamy soil is soft and crumbly, ideal garden soil and absorbs water like a sponge. Clay soil is hard as a rock when dry, sticky when wet and nearly impervious to water.
When it comes down to it, the cost and importance of basements apparently doesn't outweigh the economic benefit or else they'd be all over the place.
I'm not sure what your point of arguing is. When it comes down to it, the cost and importance of basements apparently doesn't outweigh the economic benefit or else they'd be all over the place.