Think again. They both have 2.0 liter, 16 valve motors but the Elantra has more HP and torque, not to mention better standard safety features like side curtain airbags which the Protege doesn't even have. The Elantra's Warranty is more than twice as good as the Protege's, ten years opposed to a piddly 48 months. The Elantra is $1000.00 less and looks a lot better, too. In almost every other specification they are identical.Originally posted by MazKid
Do people not realize that for the same money, they can buy much better cars like Proteges?
How many people would have the car they have if they weren't limited by money?Originally posted by vat_man
I'm no fan of Hyundais, but in terms of features and pricing they're hard to beat. I can see why 'non-car' people buy them, particularly since Hyundai are building them a lot better than they used to.
That is some twisted logic. Companies don't say "Trust me. It'll work." They have to prove it. So the opposite is true. They are very confident of the quality and know they won't be paying for a lot of repairs.Originally posted by MazKid
Did anyone stop to think that if a car has a 10 year warrenty, the company isn't confident in the quality of the car and has to have the warrenty because something will go wrong with it?
Are you accusing MazKid of being loyal to Mazda? How dare you!Originally posted by Frustrated Palm
Some people are loyal to some manufacturers
Before I had any responsiblities I switched cars about every year. Whatever suited my fancy at the moment.Originally posted by Frustrated Palm
Probably alot. Matters on who the person is. Some people are loyal to some manufacturers or are just in love with the car they have (maybe a car they had in highschool in the 60's and restored a car just like it).
Originally posted by Sage
Are you accusing MazKid of being loyal to Mazda? How dare you!![]()
Originally posted by milefile
How many people would have the car they have if they weren't limited by money?
Originally posted by MazKid
Did anyone stop to think that if a car has a 10 year warrenty, the company isn't confident in the quality of the car and has to have the warrenty because something will go wrong with it?
How many people would have the car they have if they weren't limited by money?
Originally posted by wana b drifter
one of the four could of at least got a Kia to mix it up a little.
Originally posted by vat_man
Or alternatively set themselves alight - it's a genuine alternative.
Kia issued a recall here today - apparently their seatbelts might become unbuckled in a collision. As if the poor build and underdamping wasn't enough, you might smack your head on their hard, shiny interior plastics. Tough eulogy.
Actually, no, I didn't. Why would they do that? That would be opening the door for them to lose more money on more warranty repairs. If I was building something that I knew would fail, I'd be all about limiting how long it was my responsibility to fix it. In other words, I'd be offering 1 year bumper-to-bumper and 3 year powertrain warranties, like most car companies were before Hyundai put their money where their mouth is and started shaming the others into offering longer terms.Originally posted by MazKid
Did anyone stop to think that if a car has a 10 year warrenty, the company isn't confident in the quality of the car and has to have the warrenty because something will go wrong with it?