Playstation 3 vs. Xbox 360 Discussion Thread

Why? There are plenty of good games out and coming out for the 360 that look just fine. If shiny graphics is all it takes for one to be impressed with a game you need to give up gaming. I think most of us can agree that many SNES are amazing even though by today's standards they suck. Developers need to concentrate on the quality of the game, not so much the visuals....I hate how people get wrapped up in the looks.
 
I think its a bit silly to say the xbox will remain competitive for a long time to come with just DVD9 to hold it up, at the very least they would need to start using the HDDVD drive that costs $200
Mass Effect, probably one of the most vast games to be released for '07, will fit on a DVD9. And it has great graphics.

Think about that.

I'm not saying that the DVD9 will be big enough for the next 4-5 years. However, it'll most likely be at the very earliest about mid-2008 (probably sometime in 2009 realistically) when a decent amount of games are multi-disc and/or open world games have to stay PC/PS3 exclusive because of storage issues.

Anyway, here's this post I made not too long ago that pretty much sums up my thoughts.

Me
Well, there's three scenarios with this:

1. Call of Duty 5: The Vietnam War requires 13GB of disc space. Since it's a linear game, you could essentially put the content that didn't fit on the first DVD on a second DVD.

2. Midnight Club 4: Pimp My Ride edition has three cities and a massive online multiplayer mode. It takes up 32GB of disc space. What you essentially could do is put one city on a disc, and put the online component in a 4th disc.

3. Elder Scrolls 5: Something takes up 21GB of disc space. Since it's a non-linear, open world game (and therefore won't be able to put in three discs without many problems), it will have to stay PC and PS3 exclusive.

Note, I'm not saying that I think CoD5 will take up 13GB of space and whatnot, I'm just using them as placeholders.

I doubt we'll see any general strain on disc capacity until at least mid-2008, but it's going to happen. What could MS do? They could use HD-DVD games (or even Blu-ray games, as they have already said that they'll support BD if it wins). Another option is to suck it up for a year or so, and release the Xbox 720 in late 2009. If the 360's sales are pitiful, they'll drop it (the 360) like a hot potato and move on to the 720. If they're actually good – and I wouldn't doubt that at all – they'll keep it around. A third option would to be just suck it up until it's time for Next Gen.


My 2¢.
 
Duċk;2620988
Mass Effect, probably one of the most vast games to be released for '07, will fit on a DVD9. And it has great graphics.

Think about that.

I'm not saying that the DVD9 will be big enough for the next 4-5 years. However, it'll most likely be at the very earliest about mid-2008 (probably sometime in 2009 realistically) when a decent amount of games are multi-disc and/or open world games have to stay PC/PS3 exclusive because of storage issues.
Quite agree that its not going to be an issue for games that are due to be released within the next 12 months, however as you say it could start to be an issue by mid 2008, a date not that far away in development terms. Certainly its not beyond imagination that games currently in development could face this issue, another thread in here about MGS4 discussed exactly the same thing.

Don't get me wrong I'm not bad-mouthing the 360 as a machine, but if this does become an issue, then traditionally gamers have always been unhappy with having to buy expensive add-ons just to be able to play games. It could as you say force MS's hand on its follow up to the 360, and having to rush a system will always make for problems (just ask Sony).



Why? There are plenty of good games out and coming out for the 360 that look just fine. If shiny graphics is all it takes for one to be impressed with a game you need to give up gaming. I think most of us can agree that many SNES are amazing even though by today's standards they suck. Developers need to concentrate on the quality of the game, not so much the visuals....I hate how people get wrapped up in the looks.
I don't think people are saying that all they need to be happy with a game are nice graphics (or all PS3 owners would be swooning over Genji - very nice to look at, but pants to play - fixed camera nastiness). Players of all systems want solid gameplay to match the visuals, but that said good visuals can and do aid the gameplay with some genres, aiming and placing a shot in a FPS is far easier if the target can actually be seen, rather than blending into the background; racing games are always far more enjoyable to play if you can actually see the corner rather than it popping into existance. Extreme examples I know, but they do serve to illustrate the point.

For me some of the most influential games made have pushed both gameplay and the hardware forward. Anything from Elite, Gran Turismo, GTA, to MGS and Halo. All of these pushed both gameplay and the systems that they were running on.

Regards

Scaff
 
As Scaff pointed out, I'm talking about the long term, pretty much all current tittles within a year shouldn't have any problems at all. However it will be interesting to see what MS does over the next couple of years to compensate for the smaller capacity of DVD. It's not all about shiny graphics, its about having more levels, more options, more detail,more story, more of everything, that takes disc space. Graphics are only a part of the total equation.
 
Disk space is not about graphics only , if you want to put allot of conetent Disk space is in issue have a look at forza 2 only 300 cars compared to GT4's 800(or was it 700) and 12 track enviroments , and after that you have to pay for downloads (extra , cars and tracks) they could of fitted more cars track but other feauters would suffer ..... so disk space I think is an issue
 
You compared GT4 to Forza 2? Considering GT4 was last gen and Forza 2 is current gen it doesn't make a lot of sense. The additional graphics account for the increased size, not to mention the fact that all the cars are customizable.

But really the 360 will just having 2 DVD's if the games get to big, honestly as long as the prices are the same I won't really care.
 
But really the 360 will just having 2 DVD's if the games get to big, honestly as long as the prices are the same I won't really care.

2 disc is fine for many games and can help ease the load for developers, however there are always nonlinear games (of which there are more and more) that multiple discs would not work as well for, GTA is one such game, imagine having to switch discs every time you want to go from one city or island or whatever... loading times are one thing, but switching discs? However I don't think this will actually be a problem for GTA4 but more likely in future games (including future GTA)
 
Since I own a Wii and only a Wii, does that make me a more objective judge in all of this? :lol:

The Xbox 360 is the better system, IMO, and the public seem to be voting in agreement with their wallets. In fact, in several months' time the question posed by this thread may become moot -- many would-be PS3 owners have been sitting on their hands waiting for their favorite exclusive to come out (including GTP members waiting for GT5), and if Ace Combat and Devil May Cry are any indication, Sony may lose enough exclusives to lose much of its fanbase, as those would-be owners decide to buy the 360 with its easier-to-swallow price.

Even if that doesn't turn out to be true, those would-be owners are still putting Sony between a rock and a hard place. Game developers look at console sales when deciding whether or not to release for a system, but consumers look at game releases when deciding whether or not to buy a console. If consumers don't buy enough consoles (and the PS3 isn't doing particularly well), game developers will avoid the platform (or at least exclusivity deals), which will in turn cause consumers to avoid the console, causing more game developers to avoid the platform.

I'm afraid the PS3's situation may already be snowballing into this, and it won't have the low price that helped the GameCube maintain a faint pulse throughout its similarly-plagued run.



But enough about sales and public opinion. Here's my own:

From what I understand, the PS3's Cell processor, despite its multiple cores, collectively runs at 3.2Ghz (as listed at Wikipedia). If this is true, the hardware capabilities of both systems are roughly the same, and the whole "superior hardware" argument can be thrown out as far as I'm concerned. This is certainly supported by the games that have appeared for each system thus far, which all look about the same. PS3 developers have yet to pull the rabbit out of the hat and produce anything that indicates a huge reserve of power.

If I think the hardware is comparable, why do I think the 360 is better? Good question. Well, first of all, although the 360 had its own hiccups early on, I've never seen a game console bog down and freeze as often as the PS3 does at my local EB. It isn't even turned on half the time, because there's almost no point in bothering -- playing MotorStorm at a slow-motion 10 frames per second or less isn't fun for anyone. I know the problem is being caused by overheating, but the 360 (apart from the first few weeks) and Wii don't seem to be having any problems in their enclosed cases, and the old PS2 they used to have never failed, to my knowledge, despite living in a case that was even worse-ventilated than the PS3's.

Then there's the quality gap between the excellent Xbox Live and the PS3's online system, which from what I've heard is goofy, at best. Speaking of quality, although I love my PS2 and a friend of my loved his PSP, they're not what I'd call "well-built," particularly the controllers and the PSP's buttons/stick/d-pad. Even beyond the cheap controllers, my PS2 reminds me of something like an old Alfa Romeo -- absolutely wonderful, when it's working. Sometimes it'll DRE a basic PS2 CD. Sometimes it'll load GT4's dual-layer DVD instantly. I don't understand it. This uncertainty combined with the brand-new technologies in the PS3 have me worried.

Maybe it's just because of their daunting size, but the Xboxes have seemed much more durable than any Sony product, and the only Xbox/360 controllers my friends have ever had problems with were third-party ones, which always fail the same night that you buy them.

But most important (as it seems to be with everyone's opinion of the PS3) is value. I don't even need to say anything other than "$600 USD." Just...no. I didn't even want to spend the dough a 360 commands. I just use my friends' whenever I'm hanging out with them.

So, to sum up, I think the 360 is superior because the PS3...
- is overpriced,
- doesn't have much more potential (if any more) than the 360,
- appears to be too prone to overheat and screw up,
- is overpriced,
- has a yet-unproven and reportedly goofy online system,
- uses relatively untested technologies, including a revolutionary processor and new-format disc drive, yet was built by Sony, and
- is overpriced.

...and the 360...
- is decently priced,
- doesn't have much less potential (if any less) than the PS3,
- appears to be about as prone to screw up as any Microsoft product (which, if I'm honest, really isn't THAT often)
- has a proven and well-fleshed-out online system,
- uses more-dependable technologies and has proven to be acceptably durable, but most importantly,
- has a great game library that interests me more than the PS3's, and it's only getting better.

Honestly, if the 60GB PS3 retailed at, say, $300, I think the public would be going wild over it like they did on launch day, but because they want it, and not because they want to turn around and make a huge profit on eBay. Its price is its biggest flaw. It just happens to have other, smaller flaws that make the price seem that much worse.


*At the bold part: Are you serious. I honestly can not believe that you even typed that. That is among one of the most ludicrous statements that i have ever read here on GTP. Have you even heard of anyone's PS3 overheating?? I sure haven't. I'm sure you are right though, I mean, its not like the 360 has intercoolers for sale or anything like that. Oh and let me point out this thread: https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=82326
which is full of 360 problems. Granted, the 360 has been out longer, but many people have had problems with the 360 within two months of owning it. Seriously dude, do not post such ludicrous statements that can not be backed up whatsoever.

*At the rest of your post: Yes, you are right. The PS3's biggest downfall is the price. BUT that does not make it the inferior system. It just causes it to appeal to less people. AND the 360's Elite version is going to be $480 dollars, and doesnt even include an hd-dvd drive. And you could bet money that many 360 fanboys are still going to want it.

But, I am not saying all of this to make it seem like i favor the PS3. I think that they are both awesome systems, but, frankly, I am tired of 360 fanboys using price as an excuse to properly compare the two systems. The excuse just wears thin.

Xbox live may be better sorted out than the ps3, but 1. the ps3's online is free and 2. everyone is familiar with the 360's format by now. Many people think that the psn is terrible simply because they are not used to it yet. And it will get better with time.
 
Have you even heard of anyone's PS3 overheating??
I've played a chronically overheating PS3. I even mentioned this in my original post. No, I don't own one, nor do any of my friends own one, but the PS3 kiosk at my mall's EB (which lives in the same sort of stuffy plastic case as the Wii kiosk and 360 kiosk), as I already said, barely ever works. It's so troublesome that the employees there are sick of dealing with it.

I guess Joey D has heard of units being returned for the same problem, too.

And yes, the Xbox 360 hasn't been problem-free, as you and a couple others have pointed out to me. I know this -- my friends' 360s have frozen a couple of times, and Import Tuner Challenge seems to have a tendency to cause the system to overheat and slow down. That's about all I've seen myself, though.

I am tired of 360 fanboys using price as an excuse to properly compare the two systems. The excuse just wears thin.
If I was a 360 fanboy, I'd own one. I don't, and very likely never will.

I just think Sony tried too hard with the PS3. If they had paid attention to their own success and realized that the PS2 outsold the GameCube and XBOX despite being the weakest system hardware-wise, maybe they wouldn't have shot for the stars and released such an blindly ambitious console.

Not that it matters much now, because unless Sony comes up with a REALLY good reason for people to buy it, the PS3 will go down in history as "the Atari Jaguar of the '00s."
 
You compared GT4 to Forza 2? Considering GT4 was last gen and Forza 2 is current gen it doesn't make a lot of sense. The additional graphics account for the increased size, not to mention the fact that all the cars are customizable.


yes I did , for an older gen game to have more content than a next gen game , only indicates that GT5 is going to have the same content as GT4 (and modt propably more) and it will have the same if not better graphics than Forza 2 (I havn't talked about gameplay because PD could screw that up but from GTHD I don't think they will) , this will happen because BR can hold more data......


this is a guy on another forum that works for EA GAMES , if you want a link to the post I will give it to you (we were having the same discussion PS3 vs 360)

FYI, 360's retail discs must contain at least 33% junk data to protect from piracy so u actually get fukall data in comparison with a PS3 disc. i agree with Fas on importance of gameplay, but having different textures, animation, character bone count (allows finer movements), VFX, multi-layered SFX (up to 7.1) etc. all can take up so much disc space so yes, PS3 is technically king at the mo. if PS3 had a better online architecture and better games then it'll have no problem shifting more quickly, even at the current price. also, i'm going to repeat that most developers only make one input source data, not platform specific, and rendering it using different dev kit. each has it own +s and -s but PS3 is defo more capable
 
I've played a chronically overheating PS3. I even mentioned this in my original post. No, I don't own one, nor do any of my friends own one, but the PS3 kiosk at my mall's EB (which lives in the same sort of stuffy plastic case as the Wii kiosk and 360 kiosk), as I already said, barely ever works. It's so troublesome that the employees there are sick of dealing with it.

I guess Joey D has heard of units being returned for the same problem, too.

And yes, the Xbox 360 hasn't been problem-free, as you and a couple others have pointed out to me. I know this -- my friends' 360s have frozen a couple of times, and Import Tuner Challenge seems to have a tendency to cause the system to overheat and slow down. That's about all I've seen myself, though.
I can certainly say that I've seen a lot worse than just overheating and slow-down from 360's, as I said in my previous post, I know a 360 owner who is now on his third console. All down to the same issue, the machine is kept in a well ventilated location, yet on two occasions when switched on the unit has failed (ring of death - all lights on red). Contact MS and while they are happy to replace the unit, they are generally quite reluctant to discuss the nature of the problem.

This is not an isolated issue by any means, GT Planet has a thread dedicated to this issue and its certainly not a small thread by any means. Nor is GT Planet alone in threads of this nature, a number of other forums I visit (many non gaming sites) have threads of an identical nature.

The PS3 (as many have already acknowledged) can overheat (so can my DVD recorder and Sky+ box), but does at least carry warning lights for an overheat. Details of all of which are quite clearly covered in the manual.



If I was a 360 fanboy, I'd own one. I don't, and very likely never will.
I would certainly not accuse you of being a 360 fanboy, I sure however that you would acknowledge you are hardly the biggest fan of Sony.



I just think Sony tried too hard with the PS3. If they had paid attention to their own success and realized that the PS2 outsold the GameCube and XBOX despite being the weakest system hardware-wise, maybe they wouldn't have shot for the stars and released such an blindly ambitious console.

Not that it matters much now, because unless Sony comes up with a REALLY good reason for people to buy it, the PS3 will go down in history as "the Atari Jaguar of the '00s."
As a PS3 owner (and quite happy to admit that) I don't personally think that Sony has tried too hard with the PS3 at all; I also find it very unlikely that the PS3 will become the Jaguar of our times.

I was still not 100% sure about getting a PS3 even up to a few days before picking mine up, "would it live up to expectation" was a thought going through my head. Still I was in the fortunate position to have the money available, so I went for it. I have to say that I have not been disappointed at all, on-line was easy to connect and set-up, the launch game line-up is stronger than we saw with the PS2 (now that I was a little underwhelmed with at launch) and on-line costs nothing extra.

I freely admit to having not yet been 'wowed' by the six-axis tilt, that's not to say it doesn't work well, because it certainly does. More that as an old duffer I prefer the sticks, my kids on the other hand far prefer the tilt. How well it will be developed in the future remains to be seen, but it important to not forget that Sony have played with the idea of using your body as a controller before, after all the Eye-toy was a quite inovative little device for a console.

As far as rumble not being present, I have to admit that this was my biggest concern, but I've surprised myself by not really missing it at all.

To be honest I don't accept a good number of the arguments you have put forward to rank the 360 above the PS3. At present they are quite equally matched.

Looking at your points one by one.

Wolfe
So, to sum up, I think the 360 is superior because the PS3...
- is overpriced, (Spec for spec the 360 is more expensive in the UK)
- doesn't have much more potential (if any more) than the 360, At launch games are as good as the 360 versions, as far as true potential goes, unless you are actually coding for both its a bit difficult to be quite so adamant on this one. But as far as disc storage capacity goes (which will become an issue) the PS3 has the 360 beat.
- appears to be too prone to overheat and screw up, based on info found on the web that certainly does not appear to be generally true. Its no more prone to this than a large number of modern electric devices and unlike the 360 at least has a warning mode rather than just frying itself.
- is overpriced, (Spec for spec the 360 is more expensive in the UK)
- has a yet-unproven and reportedly goofy online system, And you have used these have you? From my own experience the on-line is lag free and easy to use when gaming (yes Motorstorm did have server issues in PAL regions for the first two days after launch - which have been resolved now), as far as the shop goes its not that goofy at all and accessing stores from around the globe is easy to do. Home is also far more adventurous than anything MS has looked at with the Xbox or 360, now keep in mind that access to all of this is totally free.
- uses relatively untested technologies, including a revolutionary processor and new-format disc drive, yet was built by Sony, and Ohh a new console using new technology. Sorry if that sounds a big sarcastic, but to be honest I would be a bit disappointed if a new console didn't use new technology. The 'built by Sony' part is also a bit of a give away, as you seem to have developed a complex about them as a company. The Sony products I have in my house have been extremely reliable and well built, and that includes my original PS and PS2 (both launch machines and both still working).
- is overpriced. (Spec for spec the 360 is more expensive in the UK)

...and the 360...
- is decently priced,Not in the UK
- doesn't have much less potential (if any less) than the PS3,Unless a developer needs to fit a large amount of data on the disk.
- appears to be about as prone to screw up as any Microsoft product (which, if I'm honest, really isn't THAT often) Utter and complete rubbish, the 360 has a well documented issue with total unit failure, an issue that requires the console to be returned to MS for a replacement (often being replaced with a refurbished machine). An issue that 360 owners have expressed there opinions on both here at GT Planet and on numerous other forums.
- has a proven and well-fleshed-out online system, Don't deny that, but you do have to pay for it and its not exactly pushing the boundaries. In addition MS have had more time to get in right.
- uses more-dependable technologies and has proven to be acceptably durable, but most importantly,Uh see the red ring of death again
- has a great game library that interests me more than the PS3's, and it's only getting better.An argument that could be used for any console at launch or early in its life. The Wii had no titles that interested me at all at its launch, does that mean no good titles will follow? Of course not and it doesn't make the system a bad one. Let me ask you this, if Enthusia 2 was announced today as a PS3 exclusive would your opinion on this point change.


To be honest your post does come across as a bit anti-Sony, particularly the often touted PS3 is too expensive, well firstly expensive is a relative point, but when compared to the 360 its also (for the UK at least) simply not true. As I covered in my last post, spec a 360 to get close to the PS3 and its not only more expensive, but 40 gig short in the hard drive department (and you have to buy an MS drive to expand that, rather than the standard hard-drive fitment of the PS3. Pako here at GT Planet fitted a 160 gig hard drive and installed Linux to his PS3, all using the tools provided with the PS3 (Sony appear to have no issue with the use of alternative OS and certainly no issue with hard drive upgrades), I would love to see this done with such ease on a 360.

Regards

Scaff
 
Thank you, Scaff. But, Wolfe, I by no means attempted to call you a "fanboy", I was just saying that many fanboys seem to use the overpricing as an excuse. Not necessarily you.

But the fact remains that the 360 has had much worse problems all together, thus far. My computer engineering teacher just had to send his in because he got the "Ring of Death"....he had owned his system for less than two months.
 
I've played a chronically overheating PS3. I even mentioned this in my original post. No, I don't own one, nor do any of my friends own one, but the PS3 kiosk at my mall's EB (which lives in the same sort of stuffy plastic case as the Wii kiosk and 360 kiosk), as I already said, barely ever works. It's so troublesome that the employees there are sick of dealing with it
A problem with that analogy:Have you played a PS3 that wasn't in a plastic box, and then felt the air coming out of it? Said air is ridiculously HOT. If you have that air being forced out of the system, only to come back in because the PS3 is buried in a coffin, it is no fault of the console. It isn't liquid cooled, and that would be the only real way that the problem would be avoidable.Meanwhile, I have seen 360 systems sitting in Wal Mart in relatively open air (comparitively speaking) that are just sitting there, dead, due to overheating. I understand where you are coming from, but using the "it didn't happen to me, nor did I see it happening, so it doesn't occur" excuse is an unacceptable excuse. My PS1 is from launch day. It still works. However, I can't say they all do, and I'm sure my Playstation being one of the last launch day models still left is closer to the truth.
 
My PS3 has had no overheating problems whatsoever.

It doesn't even get warm.
 
There was an overheating issue with the PS3, it's all around gaming websites and ask anyone who works at a gaming store. Yes the 360 was the same way upon launch but it's fixed now, I've had my 360 about a year and nothing has ever gone wrong with it. The PS3 must be fixed now as well since I haven't heard any recent stories of it.

Scaff
Pako here at GT Planet fitted a 160 gig hard drive and installed Linux to his PS3, all using the tools provided with the PS3 (Sony appear to have no issue with the use of alternative OS and certainly no issue with hard drive upgrades), I would love to see this done with such ease on a 360.

You can put Linux on a normal Xbox very easily, I can't imagine the 360 is hard either. Look around at some Xbox website, I'm sure someone has done mods like that, in fact I'm almost certain they have.
 
Over here the 3 red lights seem to be a fairly common problem on X360s. I read new cases practically every day on Brazilian forums. It seems the 3RL can be caused by different issues, but the most common one is the memory chips that start to malfunction. Actually, that happens because the X360 was poorly developed. It heats too much, and with time the heating causes the memory chips' solderings to give away and that's why the console stops. Sometimes you can just smack the console and it starts to work again because the memory chips are back in place, but that won't last for long.

Some people here are opening their X360 and gluing some rubber (erasers is the correct word I think) on the chips to force them against the X360 case. That way they won't malfunction anymore. And it actually works! :lol:
 
There was an overheating issue with the PS3, it's all around gaming websites and ask anyone who works at a gaming store. Yes the 360 was the same way upon launch but it's fixed now, I've had my 360 about a year and nothing has ever gone wrong with it. The PS3 must be fixed now as well since I haven't heard any recent stories of it.
Which is my exact point. Wolfe singled this out as a problem common among PS3's and implied it was a minor issue with the 360. Something that quite simply is not true, modern AV equipment and consoles (particularly those fitted with a hard drive) are very sensitive to ventilation and cooling. Simply put its a factor that must be taken into account when picking a location for the unit. To MS's credit they have taken it on the chin and replaced units under warranty for owners (and done so quickly), and to Sony's credit they have put in place temp sensors in the PS3 to pick up temperature increases and put the machine in warning mode to help avoid overheating.

I've also just done a quick 'google' on both and the results are as follows (yes I know its not exactly scientific, but what the hell):

Google Term - Xbox 360 ring of death
Results - 1,290,000, with most of the main results being owners directly complaining about machine failures.

Google Term - PS3 Overheating
Results - 368,000, most of which are news articles about the demo PS3's at the Tokyo Games show overheating, which was pre-launch.

As I say, not scientific, but if PS3's were dropping like flies I would expect far more hits on google from it and also hits more recent than Oct 2006 (the highest placed link on that search). This 'top hit' links to an article (dated as I say Oct '06) which reads as follows:

Sony's demo PlayStation 3 consoles on display at last month's Tokyo Games Show were plagued by numerous reset-requiring crashes, it has been alleged. The claim has prompted fears the machine may not be ready for prime-time when it ships into the US and Japan later this year.

The allegation was made Macquarie Equities analyst David Gibson in a note to investors, according to a Washington Post report. Gibson himself admitted the cause of the problem was unknown - he suspects heat issues caused by the sealed cases in which each PS3 was placed to prevent anyone taking a peek inside the console, and the high temperatures experienced at the venue itself.

That's entirely possible, particularly since the PS3 is expected to contain some serious cooling technology. Even Microsoft's Xbox 360 needs a liquid cooling system to prevent the console from overheating, as revealed by a recent attempt to convert the console into a laptop.

Confirmation, of sorts, comes via PS3M magazine in the UK, recently given a demo of the machine. Staffers claim the console is not only very quiet but also very heavy, factors which point to some aggressive, fan-less cooling - not to mention a hefty in-box power transformer.

Unlike the Tokyo demo units, the PS3M machine wasn't sealed in, allowing plenty of space for the heat to escape. Of course, none of these consoles may be consumer-ready equipment, even though Sony is now believed to be punching out PS3s as fast as it can.

The Tokyo Game Show problems certainly worried Gibson, and they appear to have scared investors too, knocking ¥130 ($1.22) off Sony's share price yesterday, the day after Gibson's report was sent out. ®
Source - http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/10/04/ps3_heat_claim/

The following is an extract from the top hit on the Xbox 360 search (and is dated 1st April)

Whatever the reason for seeing them, these lights are never a welcome sight. We’ve read the plights of our forum members who’ve had to go through the process of getting a new Xbox 360 when they’ve gone caput, and heard the problems experienced with trying to get a new system. So when several of us at TeamXbox had our systems go the way of the dodo, we decided to record the process from beginning to end, to see what all is involved, and maybe offer up some friendly advice for those who’ve yet to experience this issue. We also gave Microsoft a chance to chime in on the subject, and they’ve obliged, which does show us that the console maker is all about righting the red-ringed fleet.
Source - http://editorials.teamxbox.com/xbox/1651/The-Red-Ring-of-Death/p1/

Now lets be honest here, its quite a different set of results, and in no way am I trying to dismiss either machine here, I actually admire the way that MS has dealt with the whole issue, but it does re-enforce my point that in no way can it be argued that the PS3 is less reliable than the 360. Rather, on the face of it, the 360 appears to be the less reliable of the two, with fall-out rates for early machines being put at around 10% (MS claim around 3-5% an IGN poll put it at 15%, but most industry watchers put it around 10% - Source - http://weeklygeekshow.com/2007/03/the_360s_ring_of_death_an_anom_1.php).



You can put Linux on a normal Xbox very easily, I can't imagine the 360 is hard either. Look around at some Xbox website, I'm sure someone has done mods like that, in fact I'm almost certain they have.
That's the entire point, of course its possible to do on the Xbox and 360, but you need to hack the damn things to do it. Let me ask this, do the Xbox or 360 have a standard option that allows you to set up drive partitions for an alternative OS? Does the Xbox or 360 have a standard option to install an alternative OS? I believe that no is the answer to both of these, yet Sony seem quite happy for people to do as much, providing the tools to do so as this screen shot from Pako's thread shows.




In addition we also still have the small issue of upgrading the hard-drive itself, this can be achieved on the PS3 using a standard 2.5 laptop drive, while the 360 required a dedicated MS drive.

Regards

Scaff
 
I own a 360 and I have a hard time believing ANYTHING will overheat easier than this thing or hell sound louder than this thing. Typical M$ for ya though. :dopey:
 
I own a 360 and I can honestly say, Windows 98 was less buggy for me. It's the most unreliable console I've ever owned, the console is crap. There's some good games out and coming out for it though, so I'm certainly keeping it, but the console is bugged to hell. Mine isn't one of the first batch either.
 
Yes, two of my friends have 360s. Both got them at the same time and one couldn't be more happy with his and has had no problems. while the other had one die completely and has an intercooler for the replacement to keep heat levels down. To the credit of MS though, he said it was very easy and hassle free to get his second system, which was brand new without spending anything out of pocket, even had all of his data transferred onto the new system. So it's pretty safe to say that not all 360s are have this problem but there really isn't a way to predict who has problems and who doesn't. I think it would also be safe to say that pretty much any newer 360 is probably going to be far less prone to these problems since MS has certainly learned and made small changes.
 
Scaff
That's the entire point, of course its possible to do on the Xbox and 360, but you need to hack the damn things to do it. Let me ask this, do the Xbox or 360 have a standard option that allows you to set up drive partitions for an alternative OS?

It took me maybe an hour total to put Linux on my Xbox and it cost me a whole $2.99 in order to find the game you need to do it. The only reason I did it was because I could, I see no real reason with putting Linux on an Xbox. I felt like it would be something fun to do one boring night.

I don't see how so many of you have had problems with your 360, the launch ones were buggy but the launch PS3's were buggy as well. Every console has glitches when it's released. I have had zero issues with my 360 and I remember a couple of all nighters where the 360 was on for 10 hours straight. Mine sits on the carpet and my room is far from clean, the thing never gets that hot and it's worlds quieter than my computer so I don't complain.

The 360 is a good system and so is the PS3, I don't understand what's so hard to see about that.
 
I have one question.

*For all of those who own a PS3: Have you had any problems whatsoever with your system? I mean whatsoever. I suspect that if the PS3 really had bugs or problems that surely someone here at GTP can attest to it. I mean, there are a lot of members here, many of which have launch ps3's and I havent heard a single one of them complain about bugs or anything malfunctioning.
 
I have had zero issues with my 360 and I remember a couple of all nighters where the 360 was on for 10 hours straight. Mine sits on the carpet and my room is far from clean, the thing never gets that hot and it's worlds quieter than my computer so I don't complain.
Toronado
I understand where you are coming from, but using the "it didn't happen to me, nor did I see it happening, so it doesn't occur" excuse is an unacceptable excuse. My PS1 is from launch day. It still works. However, I can't say they all do, and I'm sure my Playstation being one of the last launch day models still left is closer to the truth.


 
The same can be said about the PS3 then, just because people didn't have issues here doesn't mean they didn't happen? Am I'm right on this one?

I was just saying I haven't had a problem and most of the people I've talked to haven't either. The only person I think I know that had a problem bought his on launch day and those seemed to be buggy. Every launch system has had bugs, it's nothing new. I had quite a few issues with my PS2 that I bought on launch day.
 
I have one question.

*For all of those who own a PS3: Have you had any problems whatsoever with your system? I mean whatsoever. I suspect that if the PS3 really had bugs or problems that surely someone here at GTP can attest to it. I mean, there are a lot of members here, many of which have launch ps3's and I havent heard a single one of them complain about bugs or anything malfunctioning.

mine isn't exactly a launch PS3 but its been on more than half the time on it and I haven't had a single freeze or overheat... between folding and playing games I seldom turn it off.

about the kiosk PS3s, aren't those pre production hardware thats not actually built into the ps3 box itself, but rather the kiosk? I'm surprised they lasted as long as they did considering all the heat that must build up in there.

it's pretty well documented that people had a lot of trouble right away after launch with 360s dying or overheating, far more so than has happened around the ps3 launch. I don't think anyone here is trashing the 360, just pointing out the flaws that it has just like any other console. It seems like a lot of people that don't own a PS3 or wouldn't even consider buying one go about trashing it with unfair statements and a lot of people that own one know that most of that trashing is really unfounded
 
I would more than happily buy a PS3 if it wasn't $600 and had some games that I wanted to play. I will get one eventually, but I just don't have $600 to spend on a console right now, the $400 for a 360 wasn't easy.

And most of the 360 trashing is by uninformed people as well, it seems most people thinks it sucks because it doesn't have BluRay.
 
I would more than happily buy a PS3 if it wasn't $600 and had some games that I wanted to play. I will get one eventually, but I just don't have $600 to spend on a console right now, the $400 for a 360 wasn't easy.

And most of the 360 trashing is by uninformed people as well, it seems most people thinks it sucks because it doesn't have BluRay.

well anyone that is actually trashing the 360 for that reason should know that bluray was still in its infancy then so its not really fair to say it should have had it from the get go, one could argue they should have gone with HD-DVD though
 
That would have raised the price to at least $600 and that would have hurt the sales of the 360. $200 additional dollars is quite a bit of money and could easily be spent on a couple of games, an extra controller, whatever (that is if you even had it). If the 360 would have been $600 I would not have bought it and I would have just stuck with the Wii (which is one of the coolest systems I've even played).
 
The same can be said about the PS3 then, just because people didn't have issues here doesn't mean they didn't happen? Am I'm right on this one?
In practice, the sentiment is usually right, and you are quite correct in asking that question. Outside of a rather small portion of PS3s from the original Japan/U.S. launch date, however, the PS3 is turning out to be generally more reliable than the 360 was (and in some very rare cases, still is). Which, don't get me wrong, is something I wasn't actually expecting. Its actualy quite a good thing, because I'm sure it would take quite a few class-action lawsuits to get Sony to do something about it, as was the case with the PS2.
We have to wait and see if the Euro PS3 with its different hardware specifications lives up to the same scrutiny, though.
 

Latest Posts

Back