- 26,911
- Houston, Texas, USA
- JMarine25
Here is a scenario. Someone on a radio show makes a point on a controversial issue. Two people call in to the station. Both people disagreed on the points made in the argument. One person was disagreeing and righting the debator's wrongs by saying something like "you know, I've heard everything you said, but I don't think I agree with you." The other caller said this about the debator, "damn, man/woman. You're an idiot. What? You got Alzheimer's disease or something? You don't sound so smart now with that diploma that you got by sleeping with your college's/university's president for, do you? So, here's what I think about this issue..."
As you can tell, one's trying to be polite and respectful while the other is a sarcastic jackass. The art of disagreeing doesn't have to be distasteful and sarcastic. GTPlanet, offer your suggestions for polite disagreement so that if indeed someone disagrees with something, that ruthless attacking doesn't have to ensue.
As you can tell, one's trying to be polite and respectful while the other is a sarcastic jackass. The art of disagreeing doesn't have to be distasteful and sarcastic. GTPlanet, offer your suggestions for polite disagreement so that if indeed someone disagrees with something, that ruthless attacking doesn't have to ensue.