Polyphony Was Pretty Lazy in Implementing Proper Gr.4 and Gr.3 cars

[1241Penguin]

1. You have explained nothing. I have given a detailed explanation of what was wrong. You have done nothing just stated I was wrong.

Let's start with what it means to make a statement of fact versus making an opinion.

3. I glossed over nothing. You are trying to be a little smart alec by arguing semantics instead of focusing the issue at hand. You don't even have the game.

See, you did it again.

And this is my response: this is supposed to be an FIA endorsed motorsport game focusing on online racing. After 4 years, and a pitiful car and track count, PD could not be bothered to put in the accurate GT3 and GT4 models at the very least, those two classes which this game is heavily based around.

Yep, the car selection in GT Sport is pretty pathetic. I agree completely. Anything else?

So why the **** are you on here trying to give attitude.

Irony.


Feel free to check my post history pertaining to the GT threads. I've been pretty critical of PD for the decisions that they've made especially with regards to the PS3 era games and up. I've called out other members who obscured or altered "facts" that would otherwise have put GT/PD in a bad light. I've even been out by other members who accuse me (and others) for being too negative.

But hurling insults is not something I would do. You've pointed out places where PD made some strange choices, and I agree with that. The part where you vehemently call them so very l a z y is, unfortunately, what gives critical voices a bad name, and gives legitimacy to those who accuse myself and others of being too negative then blocking out all negativity flat out, constructive or otherwise. It also makes your posts seem more like an emotional-driven attacks rather than fair assessments. Surely you can understand that, no?

 

[jesQuick]

I ****ing hate this modern gaming culture that people accept as normal and even clamour for. Step outside your door once in a while and people might realise how ****ed up it is. What was once the way to cram every bit of content in possible, Gt6. It's now to release half a game and then sell you all the extra **** after. Are people ****ing mental! Slightly off topic this. So more on topic, you know they'll bring these motors out as dlc that the



Types will love. Back off topic, These developers must laugh all the way to their Lambo and continue laughing as they drive to the bank.
It's a ****ing win win, only we're in the wrong business people

And it's still not laziness. For you and others it's laziness but for others it's just questionable.

You don't know if it's laziness or not. Nor do I. But it SEEMS lazy, for many reasons stated elsewhere in this thread.

Anyway, it's a moot discussion until we hear from someone actually working for PD.

I'm out. (Of this thread)

 

[Gnarlyjin]

I really dont mind if they use the same base model for N/gr4/gr3/grB. They are better off concentrating on physics, graphics and balancing the game. I think theres a sufficient variety of cars for racing as it is. Gt Sport is all about racing not about collecting cars. Its better to have few cars per class that each feel different vs the usual hundred cars that look different but all feel the same.

This also makes it easier to add whole brands to the game. If they would like to add say Volvo - S60 polestar N300/N500, S60 gr4 and S60 gr3, please do.

I really dont care if the gr4/gr3 follow real world models. It would actually be nice to see something like Opel/ Vauxhall Insignia gr4/gr3. I used to care about driving real world cars, but now I prefere even competition over them.

What we really need is more tracks..

Same here. Enough Car, Need more tracks