Porsche 911 GT2 RS- The New Widowmaker

  • Thread starter Clark
  • 96 comments
  • 17,481 views
Well my copy of Evo came through the door today, and I suggest everbody goes out and gets this months (although I'd actuallyu suggest getting it every month).

The Monley has driven the GT2 RS.

Just been to Tesco and they didn't have it, every little helps my arse! :grumpy:
 
Maybe think subscribers get it earlier, that's all I can think.
 
Maybe think subscribers get it earlier, that's all I can think.

That's usually the case with magazine subscriptions. It's one of the things publishers do to make subscribing that bit more enticing. Although it's realistically just a side effect of the printing and distribution process. Subscribed mags will be the initial print run (which is why they can have a different cover section) which then get finished and posted off to subscribers whilst the shop-bought ones are printed, finished and distributed over the next 3 or 4 days.
 
Last edited:
Maybe think subscribers get it earlier, that's all I can think.

Actually I think EVO normally comes out in the shops on a Wednesday so I'll have to be patient

It looks like an awesome issue, no doubt the subscribers cover is even awesomer :)

car_photo_382033_13.jpg


EVO ***** Porsche 911 GT2 RS review - hit the link for loads of photos

Flat out in the fastest 911 ever. Chris Harris drives Porsche's 611bhp, 205mph rear-drive GT2 RS

What is it?

A £164,107 Porsche 911, with 611bhp and 516lb ft. It is the fastest 911 ever to leave the factory. Its sole aim appears to be putting every Porsche tuner out of business – I mean how much more power do you really need?

Technical highlights?

The base engine is identical to the 997 GT2 (which is no longer built), but runs different turbochargers, new intercoolers, new pistons and a new engine management system to run 1.6 bar of boost, over the last cars 1.4bar. Claimed performance is of the ‘what-the-hell’ variety with 0-62mph in 3.5sec, 0-100mph in 6.8sec and a ‘Ring lap of 7min 18sec.

The chassis is basically slightly up-rated GT3 RS, which is a pretty solid base. There are a few adjustments to fit this turbo application and for even better response the rear axle has more solid linkages than the GT3 RS.

Aerodynamically, it’s quite similar to the 997 GT2, but runs a new splitter, new rear diffuser and an extra gurney on the rear wing. Doesn’t sound like much, but it nearly has as much downforce as the GT3 RS. All that carbon, plus plastic rear and side windows shave 70kg over the last GT2.

What’s it like to drive?

Comedy fast. I jumped out of a new 997 Turbo S into this thing and, at first, wondered what the fuss was all about. Being turbocharged, it doesn’t make much noise and it’s so easy to drive at low speed, rides so well, that you treat it like any normal 911.

The fixed buckets are identical to the GT3 RS’s, the dash is plain 911, there’s far less induction noise than you get in the normally aspirated cars. It’s actually all a little disappointing until you open the taps in third and the car drags the horizon onto your forehead.

There’s no PDK option, just a robust, short-throw manual. The clock would have you believe that a Turbo S is quicker to 62 and as fast to 100mph, but, as ever, the clock lies. This car is different-world fast to the Turbo S.

And of course it’s a challenge for the driver. No other turbocharged 911 comes close to offering the chassis balance that this car does. It has monster front–axle grip and it doesn’t set to that initial understeer that used to plague the 996 GT2. You turn, it grips, the motor lunges, the front axle grips more, then the crazy traction takes-over on the exit of turns. The steering is stunning. Drive it fast, use its potential for a few minutes and you have to back-away before the numbers get silly. The traction and stability control calibration is a masterstroke: you can use so much of the performance, so much of the time.

It’s freakishly comfortable too. Occasionally a low speed bump elicits a creak from those rear rose-joints, otherwise it rides no more harshly than a Carrera on sports suspension. In fact it might just be more supple.

I saw 334kmh on the speedo, and it was still pulling like a mentalist.

How does it compare?

It’s faster, more useable and far cheaper than a 599 GTO. But then it doesn’t feel as special, isn’t lathered in as much carbon and is virtually mute compared to the musical Fandango. Neither the Lamborghini LP670 SV or LP570-4 SL are as quick or as capable. But again they both trounce the GT2 RS for sheer drama.

Anything else I need to know?

Those front wings are new for this car. Instead of the GT3 RS’s ugly extensions, they’re one-piece items, albeit an optional one. It’s very expensive and doesn’t sound as good as the GT3 RS, and they should be making 300, not 500. But this is a remarkable car. Veyron aside, it’s the fastest road car I’ve driven – but it’s completely useable and it still involves you in the process. Want.

car_photo_383560_25.jpg


car_photo_383584_25.jpg


car_photo_383557_25.jpg


car_photo_383566_25.jpg


car_photo_383563_25.jpg
 
Last edited:
Arrrggghhh... going to have to make a special trip to get a copy tonight.

NO SPOLIERS UNTIL I'VE READ IT IN PEACE AND QUIET PLEASE!
 
Arrrggghhh... going to have to make a special trip to get a copy tonight.

NO SPOLIERS UNTIL I'VE READ IT IN PEACE AND QUIET PLEASE!

I think it's in the shops tomorrow not tonight...hope you don't make a wasted trip ;)
 
Couldn't help reading what you posted... no will-power :D

Some very encouraging quotes from The Monkey...

'334kmh and still pulling like a mentalist' ... that's 200mph in real speed

'This car is different-world fast to the Turbo S' ... the S does 0-100mph in 6.8s

'Faster and more usable than a 599 GTO' ... at half the price

I have a stiffy.
 
Sorry, I'll put it in "spoiler" quotes next time :lol:

I'm sure the magazine article will be much more in depth...just need to wait for them to post the videos on the website now :D

...you're a bad man :ill:
 
I havn't read the story yet, i'm saving it for later. Neal the collector's cover is the first picture in your previous post.
 
I got my issue today in the post, the front cover is VERY nice. I've yet to read the article since I'm off to my girlfriend's but I'll try and read it while she's playing games. It looks awesome.
 
Tesco didn't have the new edition of EVO out yet :grumpy:

Here's Autocar's GT2 RS review and just in case Stotty hasn't got his hands on the mag yet it's in spoiler quotes ;) He's read it so it's now spoiler free :dopey:

What is it?
Legalised insanity from those wacky folk in Porsche’s Motorsport department or, to put it another way, the maddest production car ever to wear the shield of Stuttgart on its nose. And, no, we haven’t forgotten the Carrera GT. This new GT2 RS is a smidge lighter, a touch more powerful and a vast amount more torquey even than Porsche’s street-spec Le Mans car of 2003.

To achieve that Porsche married the twin turbo 3.6-litre motor from the outgoing GT2 to a substantially modified version of ultra-hardcore chassis of the current GT3 RS and, just to make sure the union got off with a bang, upped the boost of the motor from 1.4 to 1.6bar, neatly liberating another 88bhp to finally gain entry for the 911 to the rather exclusive club of standard production cars with over 600bhp. 611bhp, to be precise.

But this gives no impression of the true potential on tap and for two reasons. First, it gives no account of torque which, when 516lb ft of the stuff sits under your right foot at 2250rpm is kind of hard to ignore. For comparison’s sake, the Ferrari 458 Italia that everyone’s going to compare the GT2 RS to has just 398lb ft and you have to wait until the engine is spinning at a dizzying 6000rpm before it can be accessed.

The second unavoidable consideration is weight: at 1370kg the GT2 RS is not only 70kg lighter than the old GT2, it is 115kg lighter than the 458. Get this for a fact: not even Ferrari’s 599 GTO can get anywhere the power to weight ratio of this Porsche. But the Porsche costs a little over £164,000, the Ferrari a little less than £300,000.

What’s it like?
Rather boring - if you happen to be an astronaut, top fuel dragster driver or land speed record holder. For the rest of us it shouldn’t come with GT2 RS decals down the side but Government Health warnings. Those of a nervous disposition or in less than complete cardiac health really should avoid this car like a seafood stall in downtown Cairo.

The problem is it actually appears comparatively tame at first. It makes a lot less noise than the standard GT3 you can buy for half the money, and responds to your first tentative prods of the accelerator rather gently. Conceivably this is a car you could use everyday thanks to a firm but supple ride, tolerable noise levels in the cabin (it’s quieter by far than a Boxster Spyder with the roof up) and Porsche’s typically effective driving environment.

But if you show it the stick, you had better had your wits about it. Forget the 3.5sec run to 62mph, because that says everything about the traction limitations of two-wheel drive (a normal Turbo S is quicker over this measure) and nothing about the pulverising acceleration that’s actually available. More meaningful is the 6.8sec it takes to hit 100mph from rest, which puts it within half a second of McLaren F1 pace. If you put your foot down at a 100mph by the time you’ve registered and taken stock of what’s happening, you’ll be at or past 130mph.

It asks questions almost any chassis would struggle to answer, but not this one. Although it’s essentially the same as that which underpins the GT3 RS, there are detail differences: rose joints in the suspension for a bit more wheel control, a different compound and construction (though no change in size) for the sticky Michelin Cup tyres.

But for all its speed, neck-snapping grip and improbable poise, the GT2 RS is a less intimate experience than its GT3 RS stablemate. The noise isn’t there which is an inevitable consequence of this kind of forced induction and, for the same reason, nor is the throttle response.

It has the balance of the GT3 RS thanks to sharing its wider front track, and bites into the apex with the same alacrity as a result, but once there it provides you with fewer options to tune your line through the corner as well as a fairly serious caveat that this is a car you mess with at your peril. The fact that it has almost 200 less easily modulated lb ft of torque, 4500rpm lower down the range should serve as all the warning you should need.

Should I buy one?
There is nothing like the GT2 RS and that’s an almost entirely good thing. Even so, unless you always dreamt of being a human cannonball, a GT3RS offers a purer driving experience, and the fact that you’ll have to part with around the price of a new standard 911 for the upgrade at first seems hard to justify.

On the other hand find another car that goes like this for this kind of money, and combines that with drive it any day, park it anywhere ease of ownership. In fact, don’t bother because it doesn’t exist. I expect the majority of the 500 lucky people who will get to own a GT2 RS will be Porsche completists, unable to bear the idea that someone other than them is enjoying Stuttgart’s ultimate road car, at least until the 918 comes out. And enjoy it they will for driving a GT2 RS is one of few experiences you know will lodge in your brain forever. It really is that good.

Andrew Frankel

Porsche 911 GT2 RS
Price: £164,107; Top speed: 205mph; 0-62mph: 3.5sec; Economy: 23.7mpg; CO2: 284g/km; Kerbweight: 1370kg; Engine: 3600cc, twin-turbo, flat-six, petrol; Power: 611bhp at 6500rpm; Torque: 516lb ft at 2250-5500rpm; Gearbox: six-speed manual

Porsche-2171010930468021600x1060.jpg


Porsche-2171010930439731600x1060.jpg


Porsche-2171010930427391600x1060.jpg
 
Last edited:
:lol:

I was just reading that myself and I'd copied ready to paste here :D

I managed to get EVO from the local service station on the way home last night... and I've read the GT2RS article 3 times. The article in the mag is a lot more detailed than the one posted on the EVO web site, and it's a great read - for me, Harris has the ability to put in to words the emotions of driving.

Both articles (Harris in EVO and Frankle in Autocar) seem to say pretty much the same thing... the car is insanely fast, is relatively civilised, is great value for money compared to other cars with similar (or less) performance, but lacks a bit of aural excitement.

I really, really, really want one.
 
I'll take the spoilers out then :P

I'll be making a detour on my way home tonight to find the new EVO mag, Tesco just had an empty space where it should have been! The day release squad were there too so it wasn't a pleasant experience :scared:

I'd sell bits for one too preferably looking a bit like this :drool:

gt2rs_3_0_0.jpg
 
-> ...

car_photo_383560_25.jpg


^ This is an awesome shot, nuff said. ;)

-> I'm debating between three colors; White, Silver, or Gray (see above). They all look nice! :confused:
 
I'm a bit curious as to how Evo decided this was more usable than the 599 GTO. The GTO with it's paddle transmission, advanced driving aids, & 599 based platform, IMO, would seem a bit more daily driver friendly, than a 911 that is essentially, born from the original idea of the 993 GT2.
 
I'll take the spoilers out then :P

I'll be making a detour on my way home tonight to find the new EVO mag, Tesco just had an empty space where it should have been! The day release squad were there too so it wasn't a pleasant experience :scared:

I'd sell bits for one too preferably looking a bit like this :drool:

gt2rs_3_0_0.jpg

Add gold BBS wheels, one could go hunting twin-turbo 240Zs...
 
I'm a bit curious as to how Evo decided this was more usable than the 599 GTO. The GTO with it's paddle transmission, advanced driving aids, & 599 based platform, IMO, would seem a bit more daily driver friendly, than a 911 that is essentially, born from the original idea of the 993 GT2.

Whatever the model, 911's are generally pretty usable cars... decent luggage space, ride not too hard, not too loud, plently of space inside, etc etc.

Also, unlike the 993 and 996 GT2's, the 997 GT2 and GT2RS have a the full suite of driver aids. Harris says in the EVO article that they are very effective... 'so effective there's little point in turning them off'.

The cage would make accessing the space in the rear difficult... but then again a 599 doesn't have this space to start with.
 
It's also a fair bit smaller than a 599 all round which makes, in Europe at least, a car more usable.
 
That's very true... the 911 is quite a small foot print... they are a doddle to park.

Parked mine near a 599 in a London multistory a couple of months back and it looked tiny by comparision... though a GT2 will always be a bit bigger as it's got the wider rear end.
 
Whatever the model, 911's are generally pretty usable cars... decent luggage space, ride not too hard, not too loud, plently of space inside, etc etc.

Also, unlike the 993 and 996 GT2's, the 997 GT2 and GT2RS have a the full suite of driver aids. Harris says in the EVO article that they are very effective... 'so effective there's little point in turning them off'.

The cage would make accessing the space in the rear difficult... but then again a 599 doesn't have this space to start with.
I figured the GT2 RS would have been a very modern 993 GT2 in that it would be something that would take quite a bit of skill to drive even remotely moderate. Didn't know it actually had a lot of driving aids in it.
 
I figured the GT2 RS would have been a very modern 993 GT2 in that it would be something that would take quite a bit of skill to drive even remotely moderate. Didn't know it actually had a lot of driving aids in it.

I'm not sure if it's really possible for a mainstream manufacturer to produce cars like the 993 GT2 anymore. Also, I'm not sure if the demand is there for that sort of car either.

IN any case. both the stability control and traction control systems are fully switchable on the 2RS... If you want the true 'this car is going to kill me' feeling just disable them when you get caught out driving home on your MPS Cups, and it starts raining ;)

EDIT... More glowing praise from Piston Heads...

Time for some names and numbers. First there was 'Lighty' - that's what the 'GTX' department (the division of Porsche Motorsport responsible for all GT3 and GT2 models) christened the car as their fanatical obsession with saving grams took hold. Next came 'The Beast' - self-explanatory that one. Then there was 'Project 7m27', which was fine, briefly, and even made it onto some design sketches until that particular 'Ring target was obliterated. You get the feeling that there might be some other, perhaps more colourful nicknames, but Andreas Preuninger - head of GTX - simply smiles.

Then there are the numbers: 0-62mph in 3.5sec - unquestionably rapid in the extreme, but far more telling for any powerful, rear-drive car is the 0-100mph time: 6.8sec, and with 0-124mph in 9.8sec. Or there's the 0-186mph time of 28.9sec, that's before topping out at 205mph.

It weighs 1370kg to DIN standard (70kg lighter than the already pared-down GT2), and just 1280kg 'dry' - only 80kg more than the naturally aspirated GT3 Cup competition car. That DIN figure includes 30kg of coolant alone. It has 453hp per ton, and 377lb ft per ton, the peak of the latter is available from just 2250rpm all the way to 5500rpm. It's interesting to do the same maths with some rivals...

Onto the Nurburgring Nordschleife then, which it laps in 7m18sec, some 14sec faster than a GT2, during which it's hitting 180mph approaching Schwedenkreuz, around 170mph in the Foxhole compression and 192mph at the Döttinger Höhe.

So, extraordinary numbers, and they certainly make entertaining reading, but they don't fully relate the human story of this project, or tell the complete picture of how the car actually drives. The latter, in some respects, is something of a surprise.

The GT2 RS started out as an unofficial 'hobby' project within Motorsport to create a GT2 'Lightweight'. The idea germinated at the final test session of the gen1 997 GT2 at Estoril back in December 2006. Both Preuninger and Karsten Schebsdat (development of performance manager at GTX) felt the gen1 GT2 had more still to offer and set about proving it. They created a test mule and, with brutal weight saving measures, shaved 100kg off the kerb weight, while the engine guys found another 30hp, taking the total to 560hp. A new car was born, which very quickly received the RS label from anyone who sampled it.

When Rohrl recorded a 7m32 at the 'Ring in the GT2 during the spring of 2007, there was another car tucked away in the garage which the engineers suggested he might like to try for himself. Typically, Rohrl jumped at the chance and clocked 7m29 on his first lap in 'Lighty': all the ammo Preuninger needed to approach the board with his proposal.

It's a shame, because there isn't the space here to go into every weight-saving detail of the GT2 RS but to be walked around the car by the engineers is a fascinating insight into their attention to detail. Forget the previous GT2, and imagine instead the latest gen2 GT3 RS as the starting point, complete with all its trick carbon fibre bits, the polycarbonate rear 'screen, the 'lightweight' interior with its fixed-back carbon bucket seats and the centre-lock alloy wheels.

But this car then saves further weight in the body through polycarbonate rear side glass, a beautifully made carbon fibre bonnet (a 2.5kg saving over the aluminium one), and front wings made from carbon fibre, with the wheel arch extensions now part of the mould (unlike with the GT3 RS). In fact there are carbon fibre parts all over the car now, especially inside the cooling apertures.

There's also less soundproofing that saves 4kg, and each of the 500g-lighter carpet sets had to be shaped by hand; a lithium ion battery saves 14kg; there's the usual monstrous carbon ceramic brakes, and the deletion of the roof rack channels saves 500g.

Continuing through the car, 10kg was shed from the suspension components, with a number of bits now being manufactured from aluminium. The GT2 RS has 'linear' rate springs on the rear axle in conjunction with small helper springs that combined weigh less than the usual 'progressive rate' items.

One of the key objectives during the development process was moving up to a 245-section front tyre (from 235 on the GT3 RS), which caused all sorts to packaging problems for a while including wheel-well rubbing at the Foxhole on the 'Ring. But the gain has been a 10 per cent increase in the side force generated, and while it was impossible to go any larger than the already massive 325-section rears, the rear suspension now uses various rose joints to more precisely locate elements of the rear suspension.

Aerodynamics next, and the adoption of a GT3 RS-style front splitter and a larger rear wing equates to 60 per cent more downforce than the GT2. An emergency lane-change at 186mph generates 1.2g and leaves thick rubber marks on the road. Allegedly.

Meanwhile, Preuninger and his team had been cajoling the engine department to find even more power and the output kept on rising. The new engine features larger, more efficient intercoolers, a new lightweight plastic intake system and stronger conrods so it can cope with 1.6 Bar of boost pressure, passing the full range of temperature and durability tests like any new Porsche as it does so.

What I'm about to say might sound incredibly tedious, but what initially strikes you about the GT2 RS is just how easy and pleasant it is to drive. After all the talk of numbers, it's a shock to discover that it rides so well - better than a Carrera blighted by the Sport suspension 'upgrade' - and that the controls, thanks to their lightness of touch and precision, are so easy to work with in normal driving. The car feels so alert and biddable, you find yourself wishing all 911 Turbos would drive like this.

But of course, sooner or later, it's time to give it the lot and when you do you end up frantically trying to scrape your eyebrows off the inside of the rear 'screen. It's the sort of car where a cheeky blast up to 180mph on a country road is often entirely feasible; where a 140mph stroll is perfectly ordinary (at which cruising speed Preuninger reckons you'll see 28mpg!). It is insanely fast.

Fourth gear is particularly amusing: because the peak torque is so low you can be trundling along in traffic and just stretch your big toe to get past vehicles in a superbike fashion. And then you can just leave it in that gear until you're at silly three-figure numbers. It's like a bizarre automatic 'box. One speed.

But the more you drive the car, the more the speed 'thing' becomes a secondary feature. It's so far from being point and squirt: it's engaging and cohesive to drive in a manner turbocharged 911s normally can't quite reach. The steering is just sublime, and the amount of front-end grip it generates is colossal. The more you drive it hard, the better the understanding you have with it, the more you smile. You end up almost taking the performance for granted because you just know there's always going to be enough acceleration for the next straight bit of road, although that's not to say you get used to it. Even if you owned it, there'd always be a narrow, or bumpy or wet piece of road, or perhaps a shocking overtake that'd instantly remind you of its nuclear lunacy.

At £167,915 the GT2 RS looks like something of a performance bargain relative to its peers, but of those with that kind of money to spend some will quite legitimately baulk at the lack of a charismatic 8, 10 or 12 pot wail, a low, supercar silhouette that stops pedestrians in their tracks and a beautiful interior. And although it's entirely academic, I suspect there'll be plenty of people who might recoil in horror at spending the price of a new Carrera over that of the awesome GT3 RS: they'd miss that car's manic raw aggression too, its immediate throttle response, lofty rev limit and heavenly soundtrack.

But those seeking the ultimate 911 shouldn't and won't care, because they've found it. For those lucky, lucky 500, this awe-inspiring device is a reality. A machine of enormous speed and capabilities, it's an unforgettable drive: a split personality of light and dark, of cheek-splitting enjoyment and unabated terror. A beast.

On that last point Walter Rohrl has the last word in response to a question, from me (delivered with stupid grin and suitable reverence): "Is it a bit interesting in the wet then, Walter?"

The answer, from Walter (with a similarly exaggerated face of fear to the one he used moments earlier when we were chatting about the 1981 Silverstone 1000kms: driving a monster of a 935 with an experimental 800bhp motor, in the rain, he won, while going mostly sideways): "Ja...you can be sure..."
 
Last edited:
Dribble... want... must resist urge to sell wife/house/everything I own.
 
Back